Undesigned Coincidences: Bloody Sunday and internal evidence of independent testimony @LydiaMcGrewChannel
Undesigned Coincidences: Bloody Sunday and internal evidence of independent testimony  @LydiaMcGrewChannel
Uploaded October 2023 | Updated September 2026, 6 days ago
Here I discuss a modern example of the way that internal evidence of independence can allow us to use two reports as evidence even when we know that the people giving the reports might well have known one another and might have spoken to each other.

The substack piece that I use in this video is found here (free content):

furtherup.net/p/blood-witnesses?utm_source=%2Fsearch%2Fbloody%2520sunday&utm_medium=reader2

If you like what you read there, consider subscribing to Bethel's substack, Further Up.
Undesigned Coincidences: Bloody Sunday and internal evidence of independent testimonyHarmonization in Action: Lukes central section: Does Jesus do a loop-de-loop?Development Theories of the Gospels Are All Bunk 3: The Misuse of Mark and the ResurrectionRigidity, Gateway Drugs, and JairusCasualness, independence, and undesigned coincidences: A Gospel exampleGregors weak explanation 2Development Theories of the Gospels are All Bunk 5: This episode should have been first!Does Acts Support the Trilemma 5: Stephen and other final data pointsGospel Development Theories are All Bunk: Engagement With Pharisees 5Bad Methodology: Discrepancy Hunting in Non-biblical HistoryDiscrepancy Hunting in Non-Biblical History: Why Couldnt Plutarch Just Make a Mistake?What model of the Gospels is confirmed by undesigned coincidences?
Lydia McGrew |

Undesigned Coincidences: Bloody Sunday and internal evidence of independent testimony

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER