Uploaded February 2025 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
Dr. Michael Walker discusses the idea that the absence of evidence is not the same as the evidence of absence, and how this is not a scientifically rational inference that can be compared to a bottom-up approach from basic physics when thinking about how the human brain evolved.
Dr. Michael Walker discusses the idea that the absence of evidence is not the same as the evidence of absence, and how this is not a scientifically rational inference that can be compared to a bottom-up approach from basic physics when thinking about how the human brain evolved.
