Uploaded March 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
This doesn’t behave like TPU.....At all.
We took multiple Siraya Tech TPU variants—including standard TPU 95A, 64D, and the new **TPU-GF**—and pushed them through full mechanical testing.
Stretching them.
Loading them.
Breaking them.
And what happens under stress is not what you’d expect.
So now the real question is:
👉 **Is TPU-GF actually a step forward… or just marketing?**
---
🧪 WHAT I ACTUALLY TESTED (NO BS)
Same protocol. Every time. No exceptions.
* X-Axis tensile (yield + break)
* Layer adhesion strength
* Elongation under load
* Izod-style impact testing
* Real-world failure behavior
If it’s in my data… it earned its way there.
No fluff.
No “feels strong.”
No paid talking points.
---
📊 FULL DATA (INTERACTIVE TABLES)
👉 Materials Testing Chart:
testing.eo3dlabs.com
---
🧵 MATERIALS USED
👉 TPU 95A:
[amzn.to/3O87xik](https://amzn.to/3O87xik)
👉 TPU 64D:
[amzn.to/4slag6l](https://amzn.to/4slag6l)
👉 TPU-GF:
[amzn.to/4s0bun2](https://amzn.to/4s0bun2)
---
☕ SUPPORT THE CHANNEL
If you want to keep this type of testing going:
👉 [ko-fi.com/edgeof3d](https://ko-fi.com/edgeof3d)
---
⚙️ PRINT SETTINGS (STANDARDIZED)
All materials tested using consistent profiles:
Voron Standard:
* 0.2mm Layer Height
* 0.4mm forced line width
* 4 walls
* 5 top/bottom layers
* 40% infill (Grid, Gyroid, Honeycomb, Triangle, or Cubic)
---
🧠 REAL TAKEAWAY
Not all TPU behaves the same.
Some stretch.
Some snap.
Some… do something in between.
And TPU-GF?
It might be carving out its own category entirely.
---
#3dprinting #TPU #SirayaTech #MaterialsTesting #Engineering #Voron #AdditiveManufacturing
This doesn’t behave like TPU.....At all.
We took multiple Siraya Tech TPU variants—including standard TPU 95A, 64D, and the new **TPU-GF**—and pushed them through full mechanical testing.
Stretching them.
Loading them.
Breaking them.
And what happens under stress is not what you’d expect.
So now the real question is:
👉 **Is TPU-GF actually a step forward… or just marketing?**
---
🧪 WHAT I ACTUALLY TESTED (NO BS)
Same protocol. Every time. No exceptions.
* X-Axis tensile (yield + break)
* Layer adhesion strength
* Elongation under load
* Izod-style impact testing
* Real-world failure behavior
If it’s in my data… it earned its way there.
No fluff.
No “feels strong.”
No paid talking points.
---
📊 FULL DATA (INTERACTIVE TABLES)
👉 Materials Testing Chart:
testing.eo3dlabs.com
---
🧵 MATERIALS USED
👉 TPU 95A:
[amzn.to/3O87xik](https://amzn.to/3O87xik)
👉 TPU 64D:
[amzn.to/4slag6l](https://amzn.to/4slag6l)
👉 TPU-GF:
[amzn.to/4s0bun2](https://amzn.to/4s0bun2)
---
☕ SUPPORT THE CHANNEL
If you want to keep this type of testing going:
👉 [ko-fi.com/edgeof3d](https://ko-fi.com/edgeof3d)
---
⚙️ PRINT SETTINGS (STANDARDIZED)
All materials tested using consistent profiles:
Voron Standard:
* 0.2mm Layer Height
* 0.4mm forced line width
* 4 walls
* 5 top/bottom layers
* 40% infill (Grid, Gyroid, Honeycomb, Triangle, or Cubic)
---
🧠 REAL TAKEAWAY
Not all TPU behaves the same.
Some stretch.
Some snap.
Some… do something in between.
And TPU-GF?
It might be carving out its own category entirely.
---
#3dprinting #TPU #SirayaTech #MaterialsTesting #Engineering #Voron #AdditiveManufacturing
