Uploaded July 2026 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
Today, Mahmoud Khalil filed a suit alleging Trump officials entered a “public-private” conspiracy to deport activists.
Mahmoud Khalil, the Palestinian activist who spent months in ICE detention, is suing a constellation of right-wing figures and organizations that relentlessly targeted him over his involvement in anti-Israel protests at Columbia University. He’s also suing the Trump administration, which he says collaborated with these groups, under the Ku Klux Klan Act, a Reconstruction-era law that sought to restrict government coordination with Southern vigilantes.
Khalil’s suit, filed Tuesday in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleges that federal government officials entered into a conspiracy with ideologically driven groups, including the Heritage Foundation, Canary Mission, and Betar, to “single out Mr. Khalil and other non-citizen Palestinians and their supporters for arrest, detention, and deportation, as punishment for their support of Palestinian rights.”
You can read more about the filing in Sophie Hurwitz's story. Find it at MotherJones.com.
Today, Mahmoud Khalil filed a suit alleging Trump officials entered a “public-private” conspiracy to deport activists.
Mahmoud Khalil, the Palestinian activist who spent months in ICE detention, is suing a constellation of right-wing figures and organizations that relentlessly targeted him over his involvement in anti-Israel protests at Columbia University. He’s also suing the Trump administration, which he says collaborated with these groups, under the Ku Klux Klan Act, a Reconstruction-era law that sought to restrict government coordination with Southern vigilantes.
Khalil’s suit, filed Tuesday in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleges that federal government officials entered into a conspiracy with ideologically driven groups, including the Heritage Foundation, Canary Mission, and Betar, to “single out Mr. Khalil and other non-citizen Palestinians and their supporters for arrest, detention, and deportation, as punishment for their support of Palestinian rights.”
You can read more about the filing in Sophie Hurwitz's story. Find it at MotherJones.com.







![Trump Just Nuked a Key EPA Rule. Climate Desk Reporters Explain the Fallout.
On February 12, Donald Trump dropped the climatic equivalent of an atomic bomb. He announced the repeal of the US Environmental Protection Agency’s 2009 endangerment finding, the basis of the EPA’s ability to regulate climate-warming emissions. “This will be the largest deregulatory action in American history,” proclaimed White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt.
“This is corruption, plain and simple,” countered Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.).
The administration’s move is an attempt, essentially, to subvert reality. The Obama-era finding established that atmospheric greenhouse gases are bad for human health and welfare, allowing them to be regulated under the Clean Air Act. In 2025, a panel of scientists affirmed the finding, writing: “The evidence for current and future harm to human health and welfare created by human-caused [greenhouse gases] is beyond scientific dispute.”
Condemnation of Trump’s announcement was swift and plentiful, and called out the administration’s baldly transactional relationships with oil and gas producers. “Put simply, this is a gift-wrapped package for the fossil fuel industry,” Manish Bapna, CEO of the nonprofit Natural Resources Defense Council, told Inside Climate News. “It is unscientific, it is bad economics, and it is illegal. So we’re gonna fight it.”For this video, we asked two Climate Desk reporters who are covering the issue—Dharna Noor of Guardian US and Jake Bittle of Grist—to weigh in on the administration’s move, whether the courts will uphold it, and how it could affect the global effort to rein in Climate Change. Trump Just Nuked a Key EPA Rule. Climate Desk Reporters Explain the Fallout.](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/o7_orHb18Lw/mqdefault.jpg)


