Uploaded August 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Candace Owens and Andrew Wilson clash over how much weight should be given to the evidence presented at Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing. Owens argues that much of the hearing relied on hearsay and says that weakens claims that the case is already settled, while Wilson pushes back on how preliminary hearings work and what prosecutors are actually required to prove at that stage. The debate becomes a larger fight over hearsay, inference, and what should count as convincing evidence before trial.
Candace Owens and Andrew Wilson clash over how much weight should be given to the evidence presented at Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing. Owens argues that much of the hearing relied on hearsay and says that weakens claims that the case is already settled, while Wilson pushes back on how preliminary hearings work and what prosecutors are actually required to prove at that stage. The debate becomes a larger fight over hearsay, inference, and what should count as convincing evidence before trial.
