TomWoodsTV | The Supreme Court vs. Free Speech I TWS #2511 @TomWoodsTV | Uploaded June 2024 | Updated October 2024, 14 hours ago.
In Murthy v. Missouri the Court refused to consider the merits of a free-speech case because the plaintiffs allegedly lacked "standing," but as the dissent argues, all the elements for standing were present, and the Court most certainly should have ruled on the merits. Tracy Beanz, who's followed the case closely, joins us.
(Ep. 2511 of the Tom Woods Show)
Sponsors:
Monetary Metals: tomwoods.com/silver
Persist SEO: https://ineedseo.help
Guest's Website:
UncoverDC.com
Guest's Twitter
@tracybeanz
Show notes page:
tomwoods.com/2511
Other Important Links:
SupportingListeners.com
LibertyClassroom.com
RonPaulHomeschool.com
NationalDivorce.com
Audio & Video Production & Thumbnails by:
Podsworth Media
podsworth.com
Intro & Outro audio & video by Chris Williams, Chris Beeman, & Robert Pearson of Podsworth Media, 2024.
In Murthy v. Missouri the Court refused to consider the merits of a free-speech case because the plaintiffs allegedly lacked "standing," but as the dissent argues, all the elements for standing were present, and the Court most certainly should have ruled on the merits. Tracy Beanz, who's followed the case closely, joins us.
(Ep. 2511 of the Tom Woods Show)
Sponsors:
Monetary Metals: tomwoods.com/silver
Persist SEO: https://ineedseo.help
Guest's Website:
UncoverDC.com
Guest's Twitter
@tracybeanz
Show notes page:
tomwoods.com/2511
Other Important Links:
SupportingListeners.com
LibertyClassroom.com
RonPaulHomeschool.com
NationalDivorce.com
Audio & Video Production & Thumbnails by:
Podsworth Media
podsworth.com
Intro & Outro audio & video by Chris Williams, Chris Beeman, & Robert Pearson of Podsworth Media, 2024.