Uploaded September 2019 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Music by: Darren Curtis "Soul's Departure."
To donate to the charity shown at the end of the video, please go to their fundraising website:
healthinharmony.org/donate
To see an article about their work:
psmag.com/social-justice/save-the-trees-well-save-your-life-46121
CORRECTIONS:
At 3:20 the calcium silicon oxide is labelled "CaSiCO3". Of course it should be CaSiO3,
At 14:34 - Yes, there was an audible "no" on the soundtrack. This was from part of another track that was supposed to have been wiped. Apologies!
15:20 -- Synapsids are not reptiles. Reptiles are diapsids.
18:20 - The first mammals were egg-laying. I should have said they evolved to give birth to live young. And 'suckling' implies a nipple, whereas they probably produced milk from pores.
23:12 - The terms Paleogene and Neogene are now universal. The International Commission on Stratigraphy abolished the term "Tertiary" in 2005.
23:16 -- I should have said: "It’s likely the only surviving dinosaurs were smaller, feathered species that HAD evolved into birds."
PLEASE NOTE: This video is explaining science, so please do not write in and claim there's an "error" because it conflicts with your personal religious or ideological beliefs.
And please don't post lots of "You forgot to mention...." messages. I didn't 'forget' to mention anything, I decided very deliberately what to include depending on its importance, interest and relevancy.
So yes, I didn't mention overfolds because although that places certain strata underneath other ones physically, they are still "on top" stratigraphically. And -- I know -- I didn't mention reworked fossils, but I did say that finding fossils in chronological and stratigraphic order is a "general principle" and a "rule of thumb."
And I didn't mention a host of other geological facts because this is not a three-year geology course, it's a half-hour video.
What I DO welcome are errors of scientific fact. If you see one, please let me know and I will add it to this video description.
25:07 – Someone is bound to point out that it’s possible for a person to throw an old phone from the 1900s onto a garbage dump of the 1980s. That would mess up the dating system, right?
No, because this is an analogy about fossils. It’s easy to do this in rubbish tips, but not easy in sedimentary rocks. Creationists have tried it, and their attempts have all been laughable failures.
Fossils can only be properly dated in situ – in other words, if they are found embedded in the rock itself. Just placing a Cambrian fossil on top of a Cretaceous limestone is not going to fool anyone. So nice try, but no.
Does that take care of all the repetitive, erroneous and pedantic posts I'm going to get? Probably not.
SOURCES:
I usually put sources in the video description, but since this is just a basic and uncontroversial geology course it is unnecessary. Any basic geology textbook in your local library will have these facts, but if people want to dispute any of the science I will be happy to put a specific reference in the video description.
And if they conflict with your personal beliefs or what you have seen in blogs, then see my videos:
The Theory of Evolution Made Easy
Natural Selection Made Easy
The evidence for climate change without computer models or the IPCC
Consensus and arguments from authority
Music by: Darren Curtis "Soul's Departure."
To donate to the charity shown at the end of the video, please go to their fundraising website:
healthinharmony.org/donate
To see an article about their work:
psmag.com/social-justice/save-the-trees-well-save-your-life-46121
CORRECTIONS:
At 3:20 the calcium silicon oxide is labelled "CaSiCO3". Of course it should be CaSiO3,
At 14:34 - Yes, there was an audible "no" on the soundtrack. This was from part of another track that was supposed to have been wiped. Apologies!
15:20 -- Synapsids are not reptiles. Reptiles are diapsids.
18:20 - The first mammals were egg-laying. I should have said they evolved to give birth to live young. And 'suckling' implies a nipple, whereas they probably produced milk from pores.
23:12 - The terms Paleogene and Neogene are now universal. The International Commission on Stratigraphy abolished the term "Tertiary" in 2005.
23:16 -- I should have said: "It’s likely the only surviving dinosaurs were smaller, feathered species that HAD evolved into birds."
PLEASE NOTE: This video is explaining science, so please do not write in and claim there's an "error" because it conflicts with your personal religious or ideological beliefs.
And please don't post lots of "You forgot to mention...." messages. I didn't 'forget' to mention anything, I decided very deliberately what to include depending on its importance, interest and relevancy.
So yes, I didn't mention overfolds because although that places certain strata underneath other ones physically, they are still "on top" stratigraphically. And -- I know -- I didn't mention reworked fossils, but I did say that finding fossils in chronological and stratigraphic order is a "general principle" and a "rule of thumb."
And I didn't mention a host of other geological facts because this is not a three-year geology course, it's a half-hour video.
What I DO welcome are errors of scientific fact. If you see one, please let me know and I will add it to this video description.
25:07 – Someone is bound to point out that it’s possible for a person to throw an old phone from the 1900s onto a garbage dump of the 1980s. That would mess up the dating system, right?
No, because this is an analogy about fossils. It’s easy to do this in rubbish tips, but not easy in sedimentary rocks. Creationists have tried it, and their attempts have all been laughable failures.
Fossils can only be properly dated in situ – in other words, if they are found embedded in the rock itself. Just placing a Cambrian fossil on top of a Cretaceous limestone is not going to fool anyone. So nice try, but no.
Does that take care of all the repetitive, erroneous and pedantic posts I'm going to get? Probably not.
SOURCES:
I usually put sources in the video description, but since this is just a basic and uncontroversial geology course it is unnecessary. Any basic geology textbook in your local library will have these facts, but if people want to dispute any of the science I will be happy to put a specific reference in the video description.
And if they conflict with your personal beliefs or what you have seen in blogs, then see my videos:
The Theory of Evolution Made Easy
Natural Selection Made Easy
The evidence for climate change without computer models or the IPCC
Consensus and arguments from authority






![26 Science vs. the Feelies
SOURCES:
0:00 Clips from my previous climate change videos
0:38 The Great Global Warming Swindlewritten and directed by Martin Durkin
0:50 Proof that Global warming is a hoax on YouTube
0:54 0:54 Global Warming on YouTube, done by casiopeia project
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVASFcMwTXk (this video accepts that CO2s greenhouse effect is larger than its 0.039% presence in the atmosphere, but goes on to diminish its role on the basis that it constitutes only 4% of greenhouse gases).
1:03 Jay Lehr interviewed on The Ice Age cometh Lou Dobbs, CNN
1:07 Tim Ball, The Great Global Warming Swindle
1:10 John Coleman Global warming, the other side
1:14 Christopher Monckton, speech for Free Market Institute at St Paul Oct 2009
2:03 On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground S Arrhenius, Philosophical Magazine 1896 (First calculation of energy absorbed and re-radiated by CO2)
2:04 The artificial production of carbon dioxide and its influence on temperature G. S. Callendar,
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 1938 (Shows wavelengths at which CO2
absorbs radiation)
2:17 The Great Global Warming Swindlewritten and directed by Martin Durkin
4:03 Christopher Monckton testimony at Congressional hearings on climate change
4:51 Proof that Global warming is a hoax on YouTube
6:10 Arrhenius and Callendar papers from 2:03
6:30 John Shimkus at Congressional hearings on climate change
7:22 Sen. James Inhofe
8:06 Dennis Kucinich
8:30 Chad Myers on Lou Dobbs, CNN
8:34 Jay Lehr interviewed on The Ice Age cometh Lou Dobbs, CNN
9:24 Charlton Heston on Global Climate Change on YouTube
9:56 Phanerozoic CO2 levels after Berner and Royer
10:15 Map is from Cretaceous climate-ocean dynamics: future directions for IODP Colorado, July 2002
Source for sea level 50m-70m higher than today: The Phanerozoic Record of Global Sea-Level Change, Miller et al 2005.
11:16 Debating whether global warming is a threat or just media hype by Mark Putnam
www.helium.com
11:41 Creationist Seminar Beginnings #1 Eric Hovind
11:50 Where did God come from? Ken Ham
11:58 The OReilly Factor Bill OReilly interviews Richard Dawkins
12:55 Michael Coren and Tim Ball - Straight Talk On Climate Change
15:14 Penn and Tellers Bullshit!
Two other comments I anticipate Ill get:
1) You didnt understand what [insert name here] meant.
Yes, thats entirely possible. In the absence of facts and figures, a feelie argument is usually vague and ambiguous, often hinting at some elusive point thats never explained. When I read a scientific paper, on the other hand, I understand exactly what its saying. The hypothesis is laid out, the methodology explained, the observations and calculations clearly shown, and the conclusion spelled out. Thats the difference.
2) The idea that CO2 is a trace gas is not a feeling. It can be shown that it has no effect on climate.
My response: Yes, but the feeling is that because CO2 is a trace gas then it follows that it has no effect on climate. If this is correct, please cite a study that has some facts and figures to support it, otherwise it remains just a feeling. If you have a source with some other evidence that CO2 has no effect on climate, then I have probably covered it in a previous video. 26 Science vs. the Feelies](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/OjD0e1d6GgQ/mqdefault.jpg)



