The Pseudo-Science of Richard Dawkins @firstcauseargument
The Pseudo-Science of Richard Dawkins  @firstcauseargument
Uploaded June 2012 | Updated September 2026, 14 hours ago
Richard Dawkins (author of The God Delusion) has flipped. For a man who claims to champion science, he fails to apply it in any realistic way. Dawkins claimed that it's scientific for something to pop into existence uncaused out of nothing (and states Mr. "2+2=5" Lawrence Krauss as a reference - BTW Krauss' books have received scathing reviews). Anybody who knows science knows that you won't be able to do science if you deny the causal principle. Dawkins has embraced pop-science to hold to his views and deny theism and God. While Dawkins may be a "scientist", he is not a good spokesman for it.

Footage of Richard Dawkins as a cartoon was taken by youtube user Birdieupon: youtube.com/watch?v=sgSVD0WlR5s
The Pseudo-Science of Richard DawkinsAtheism and the Problem of Induction - James N. Anderson, PhDEvidence for Gods ExistenceA Rabbi Looks at the Kalam ArgumentGods Not Dead - Rice BroocksQuestion on Time and Kalam Cosmological Argument (William Lane Craig, PhD)Does God Exist?: Debate Between Theists and Atheists (Book Recommendation on Kalam)Is the Singularity An Actually Infinite? - William Lane Craig, PhDThe Oscillating Universe Theory Fails - William Lane Craig, PhDThe Kalam Cosmological Argument for God (Book Recommendation)Quantum Gravity Theory has Problems - William Lane Craig, PhDThe Universe is Just Necessary? - William Lane Craig, PhD
firstcauseargument |

The Pseudo-Science of Richard Dawkins

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER