The need for secondary containment for foam @SAFTENG1
The need for secondary containment for foam  @SAFTENG1
Uploaded September 2024 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
The new SAFTENG website is about to launch, but until then, I will share my video content here.

This is a perfect video to demonstrate the necessity of secondary containment. No way I would have my team in that position in this response.

But a dike would contain the flammable liquids and ALLOW us to deploy foam from a far rather than feet away from horizontal flammable liquid storage tanks!

Yes, sometimes we are responding to an event where there can not be secondary containment, and we take CALCULATED risks with elevated levels of PPE. But this is a tank farm so there is NO EXCUSE for not having properly designed secondary containment.

Would you place your team(s) in this situation or back away and protect vessels from BLEVE/HITs with unmanned monitors?
The need for secondary containment for foamLadder Failure 101Unguarded mixer and loose fitting clothingTesla Door vs BusWater and Electricity do NOT mix wellCar airborne from loose wheelDo as I do - Not as I sayCNG bus maintenance explosion 2025Public show with Liquid Nitrogen LN2 goes badErrors Mistakes Violation children at the gateWhen vertivcal pressure vessel BLEVEsGrinding without face shield or safety glasses or PFAS!  But he has on his safety vest.
Bryan Haywood |

The need for secondary containment for foam

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER