Uploaded December 2024 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
Bert Kreischer’s obsession with money and fame could be a case study for behavioral psychologists. How did a guy like Bert end up famous? He’s right up there with James Corden, Kim Kardashian, and the Hawk Tuah girl on the list of “People Who Probably Shouldn’t Have Been Famous.”
Even though Bert is still selling plenty of tickets, his demand has started to taper off, and he’s slipped down the rankings. We wouldn’t even know this if Bert hadn’t told us himself. In classic Kreischer fashion, his favorite topic is… Bert.
Follow me on Patreon for exclusive uncensored content:
patreon.com/PodcastCringe
#standupcomedy #minidocumentary #podcast
All clips used in this video are protected by the Fair Use Doctrine within Title 17 of the United States Code.
This doctrine safeguards the use of copyrighted material for transformative purposes, such as commentary, criticism, review and news reporting.
Under Title 17 U.S.C. § 512(f), any person who makes a false, bad faith, or misleading copyright claim or uses a copyright takedown to infringe on free speech, criticism, or commentary can be held liable for damages to the content creator.
Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).
Bert Kreischer’s obsession with money and fame could be a case study for behavioral psychologists. How did a guy like Bert end up famous? He’s right up there with James Corden, Kim Kardashian, and the Hawk Tuah girl on the list of “People Who Probably Shouldn’t Have Been Famous.”
Even though Bert is still selling plenty of tickets, his demand has started to taper off, and he’s slipped down the rankings. We wouldn’t even know this if Bert hadn’t told us himself. In classic Kreischer fashion, his favorite topic is… Bert.
Follow me on Patreon for exclusive uncensored content:
patreon.com/PodcastCringe
#standupcomedy #minidocumentary #podcast
All clips used in this video are protected by the Fair Use Doctrine within Title 17 of the United States Code.
This doctrine safeguards the use of copyrighted material for transformative purposes, such as commentary, criticism, review and news reporting.
Under Title 17 U.S.C. § 512(f), any person who makes a false, bad faith, or misleading copyright claim or uses a copyright takedown to infringe on free speech, criticism, or commentary can be held liable for damages to the content creator.
Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).
