Wheat Waffles | The Jawline - Analysing the Perfect Male Face (Part 1/4) @WheatWaffles | Uploaded March 2021 | Updated October 2024, 50 minutes ago.
😐 Get a Personal Face Rating & Looksmaxxing From Me: ratebywaffles.com
Part 1 – The Jawline (1 – 10)
🎥 Part 2 – The Midface and Nose (11 – 19) - youtu.be/qwbGW9jeDeo
🎥 Part 3 – The Eyes (20 – 35) - youtu.be/Fz7tI7qT5t8
🎥 Part 4 – Hair, health and skull shape (36 – 55) - youtu.be/2otjA_98StY
Total – 55 Features
**DISCLAIMERS**
1) Ranking Features Importance – For the 55 features outlined in this series I will be adding my own grades of importance, this is to highlight that each facial flaw isn’t equal. These gradings should be taken with a grain of salt as they are merely my subjective additions. The gradings are as follows:
- 5/5 Crucial Feature – Missing one of these will automatically make you sub-5 (10 of these)
- 4/5 Very Important – Missing this will subtract 1-2 points of attractiveness
- 3/5 Quite Important – Deduct Anything up to a point
- 2/5 Bonus – Can manage finely without
- 1/5 Little Bonus – Sugar on top
Obviously this isn’t a perfect system, there will be exceptions. e.g. Balding – which I’ve graded as 5/5 importance – won’t always automatically make you sub-5 as seen by actors Dwayne Johnson or Jason Statham, however it’s undeniable that such flaws will significantly impact your dating success.
Secondly, a flaw which I’ve graded 4 importance doesn’t mean you keep subtracting points until you reach negative numbers. My point is a major flaw will be much more impactful to an 8/10 man than a 3/10 man. For example, wrinkles and skinfolds caused by old age will easily knock off 1-2 points for an 8/10, but won’t really do much damage to a 3/10.
2) Subjectiveness/Types – The vast majority of features shown in this series are going to be objective and considered universally attractive. However, this ignores preferences, types and niche markets. For example, some have a preference for pretty-boys/e-boys (Harry Styles/Francisco Lachowski), others have a preference for testosterone-junkies (Dwayne Johnson/Nick Pulos). These men have features that deviate from the 'ideal'. This series ignores these outliers and niche markets.
3) Attractiveness Reasoning – Obviously most features are going to have an evolutionary reason for why they are attractive (signs of youth, health, high-testosterone etc. which will increase the odds of child's survival). I’ve done my best to explain them in this series, however this isn’t always the case. As far as our current understanding goes, some features may just be attractive for the sake of being attractive (e.g. neutral/positive canthal tilt), with no evolutionary reasoning for why those features are considered attractive. OR, there is a survival benefit to such features, but we simply haven’t discovered it yet. In future, once more research is available, it may be able to explain survival benefits of features like neutral canthal tilt.
4) Ethnicities - The vast majority of my audience reside in western countries therefore I have focussed the analysis on this. Obviously these features may NOT be ideal for other ethnicities (e.g. a broader nose may be considered more attractive for sub-Saharan men, likewise a narrower/smaller nose may be considered more attractive for east asians).
▬ Contents of this video ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
00:00 - Intro
00:39 - 1) Hyoid Skin
01:46 - **Disclaimer 1** Importance System
05:01 - 2) Chin:Philtrum
05:36 - 3) Thirds of Jaw
06:47 - 4) Chin Projection
07:05 - 5) Forward growth
07:57 - 6) Parallelity
08:37 - 7) Straightness
09:42 - 8) Goniun Depth
10:13 - 9) Gonial angle
10:38 - 10) Ramus Length
11:17 - PART 2 - Midface and Nose
😐 Get a Personal Face Rating & Looksmaxxing From Me: ratebywaffles.com
Part 1 – The Jawline (1 – 10)
🎥 Part 2 – The Midface and Nose (11 – 19) - youtu.be/qwbGW9jeDeo
🎥 Part 3 – The Eyes (20 – 35) - youtu.be/Fz7tI7qT5t8
🎥 Part 4 – Hair, health and skull shape (36 – 55) - youtu.be/2otjA_98StY
Total – 55 Features
**DISCLAIMERS**
1) Ranking Features Importance – For the 55 features outlined in this series I will be adding my own grades of importance, this is to highlight that each facial flaw isn’t equal. These gradings should be taken with a grain of salt as they are merely my subjective additions. The gradings are as follows:
- 5/5 Crucial Feature – Missing one of these will automatically make you sub-5 (10 of these)
- 4/5 Very Important – Missing this will subtract 1-2 points of attractiveness
- 3/5 Quite Important – Deduct Anything up to a point
- 2/5 Bonus – Can manage finely without
- 1/5 Little Bonus – Sugar on top
Obviously this isn’t a perfect system, there will be exceptions. e.g. Balding – which I’ve graded as 5/5 importance – won’t always automatically make you sub-5 as seen by actors Dwayne Johnson or Jason Statham, however it’s undeniable that such flaws will significantly impact your dating success.
Secondly, a flaw which I’ve graded 4 importance doesn’t mean you keep subtracting points until you reach negative numbers. My point is a major flaw will be much more impactful to an 8/10 man than a 3/10 man. For example, wrinkles and skinfolds caused by old age will easily knock off 1-2 points for an 8/10, but won’t really do much damage to a 3/10.
2) Subjectiveness/Types – The vast majority of features shown in this series are going to be objective and considered universally attractive. However, this ignores preferences, types and niche markets. For example, some have a preference for pretty-boys/e-boys (Harry Styles/Francisco Lachowski), others have a preference for testosterone-junkies (Dwayne Johnson/Nick Pulos). These men have features that deviate from the 'ideal'. This series ignores these outliers and niche markets.
3) Attractiveness Reasoning – Obviously most features are going to have an evolutionary reason for why they are attractive (signs of youth, health, high-testosterone etc. which will increase the odds of child's survival). I’ve done my best to explain them in this series, however this isn’t always the case. As far as our current understanding goes, some features may just be attractive for the sake of being attractive (e.g. neutral/positive canthal tilt), with no evolutionary reasoning for why those features are considered attractive. OR, there is a survival benefit to such features, but we simply haven’t discovered it yet. In future, once more research is available, it may be able to explain survival benefits of features like neutral canthal tilt.
4) Ethnicities - The vast majority of my audience reside in western countries therefore I have focussed the analysis on this. Obviously these features may NOT be ideal for other ethnicities (e.g. a broader nose may be considered more attractive for sub-Saharan men, likewise a narrower/smaller nose may be considered more attractive for east asians).
▬ Contents of this video ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
00:00 - Intro
00:39 - 1) Hyoid Skin
01:46 - **Disclaimer 1** Importance System
05:01 - 2) Chin:Philtrum
05:36 - 3) Thirds of Jaw
06:47 - 4) Chin Projection
07:05 - 5) Forward growth
07:57 - 6) Parallelity
08:37 - 7) Straightness
09:42 - 8) Goniun Depth
10:13 - 9) Gonial angle
10:38 - 10) Ramus Length
11:17 - PART 2 - Midface and Nose
