Uploaded January 2020 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
I have rarely in my life, if ever at all, witnessed such drivel and twaddle! And the worst thing is that she knows exactly what she is doing.
CREDITS:
Ufurrger @ Design Crowd
auburn.edu
Babak Farrokhi @ Flickr
Getty Images
blackbook @ Design Crowd
creation.com
Pixabay
MUSIC CREDITS:
"Liar" by Demon
"Pathetic Liar" by GRIP INC
This work was produced under fair use for the purposes of criticism, commentary, news reporting and research & is done in good faith & there is NO claim made to the original presumably copyrighted work & only small portions of, or, a remixing of said works was used , this was NOT a verbatim copy of the work & has NO effect on the originals potential market use , further all samples & excerpts were publicly posted BY the copyright holder although its content is "associated" with a specific person's work it is NOT endorsed by said person & was NOT created to harm the individual in question , it was made to critique their work or acts. Attempts by copyright holders to silence criticism by misuse of the DMCA should result in the removal of their access to that tool.
I have rarely in my life, if ever at all, witnessed such drivel and twaddle! And the worst thing is that she knows exactly what she is doing.
CREDITS:
Ufurrger @ Design Crowd
auburn.edu
Babak Farrokhi @ Flickr
Getty Images
blackbook @ Design Crowd
creation.com
Pixabay
MUSIC CREDITS:
"Liar" by Demon
"Pathetic Liar" by GRIP INC
This work was produced under fair use for the purposes of criticism, commentary, news reporting and research & is done in good faith & there is NO claim made to the original presumably copyrighted work & only small portions of, or, a remixing of said works was used , this was NOT a verbatim copy of the work & has NO effect on the originals potential market use , further all samples & excerpts were publicly posted BY the copyright holder although its content is "associated" with a specific person's work it is NOT endorsed by said person & was NOT created to harm the individual in question , it was made to critique their work or acts. Attempts by copyright holders to silence criticism by misuse of the DMCA should result in the removal of their access to that tool.
