Phil Halper (aka Skydivephil) | The Fine Tuning Argument debunked by a Jar of Beans @PhilHalper1 | Uploaded 1 year ago | Updated 1 hour ago
The fine tuning argument for God claims that a fine tuned universe for life is far more likely given God than without God. It's based on the notion that it is extremely unlikely that we could get life permitting values for the constants of nature without a designer. In this short film, Chris Hitchcock, Professor of Philosophy at Caltech and an expert in probability theory and the philosophy of science offers a critique. This clip was taken form a longer film on the subject, you can see here:
youtube.com/watch?v=jJ-fj3lqJ6M&t=1221s
for a reply from the proponents of the argument see here:
youtube.com/watch?v=QJYWkqOzUQ0&t=4036s
and for our counter reply see here:
youtube.com/watch?v=zNH-ZgSpBuQ&t=2319s
The fine tuning argument for God claims that a fine tuned universe for life is far more likely given God than without God. It's based on the notion that it is extremely unlikely that we could get life permitting values for the constants of nature without a designer. In this short film, Chris Hitchcock, Professor of Philosophy at Caltech and an expert in probability theory and the philosophy of science offers a critique. This clip was taken form a longer film on the subject, you can see here:
youtube.com/watch?v=jJ-fj3lqJ6M&t=1221s
for a reply from the proponents of the argument see here:
youtube.com/watch?v=QJYWkqOzUQ0&t=4036s
and for our counter reply see here:
youtube.com/watch?v=zNH-ZgSpBuQ&t=2319s