The Church Fathers DID NOT Teach the Filioque @OrthodoxChristianTheology
The Church Fathers DID NOT Teach the Filioque  @OrthodoxChristianTheology
Uploaded June 2023 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Don't mind the spicy thumbnail. This is a fun response to Dwong's video, which argues a Patristic consensus teaches the Filioque. When the passages are read in context with the correct translations, the opposite is found to be clearly the case.

0:00 Introduction
1:53 Augustine's Pneumatology
17:37 Augustine's Psychological Trinities
26:20 Hilary of Poitiers' Pneumatology
33:51 Athanasius' Pneumatology
48:36 Trainwreck Time
48:59 Cyril of Alexandria's Pneumatology
54:57 Maximus' Pneumatology
59:48 What if Maximus was talking about eternal causation?
1:04:18 Dwong's Treatment of the Letter of Marinus
1:06:02 Patristics Rapid Fire Round
1:07:46 Pneumotological Conclusions
1:12:28 LIGHT YOUR MONEY ON FIRE!
1:13:53 Questions

Dwong ringing his bell: youtube.com/watch?v=x6CcNU3YcX0&

St Hilary of Poitiers' Pneumatology: youtube.com/live/qf3pMBxrQo0?feature=share&t=3629

For more discussion, check out the Charitable Apostolic Christians Discord Group: discord.gg/qB26XRkYB9

To support the parishes in Cambodia: orthodoxchristiantheology.com/donate
The Church Fathers DID NOT Teach the FilioqueApologetics Gone Wild! Honorius and MonotheletismHistory of the Papacy: The Sixth CenturyConference: On the Eighth Oecumenical Council-The Catholic Condemnation of the FilioquePerspectives on Orthodox MusicStump the Priest with Fr John WhitefordTrue Orthodox vs World Orthodox: Whos Right?Holy-Wallet Matrix: A Parodys Guide to MenHistory of the Papacy: The Second CenturyBlessing Gay Marriage: Infallibility Invalid?The Crusade for Constantinople with Allan RuhlResponse to Dwong and the Filioque: Part 2
Orthodox Christian Theology (Craig Truglia) |

The Church Fathers DID NOT Teach the Filioque

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER