The Case for the Use of Red Lines in the Governance of Life Sciences Research @CISACatStanford
The Case for the Use of Red Lines in the Governance of Life Sciences Research  @CISACatStanford
Uploaded April 2023 | Updated September 2026, 1 day ago
with David Relman. The nature of evolving risks in life sciences research, a brief history of risk governance, and the case for the use of so-called “red lines” in the governance of life sciences research will be presented. The goals of this presentation are to elicit discussion about the benefits and pitfalls of red lines, or guardrails, in general, including a historical perspective, and options for public policy recommendations to address concerns about the present and future risks arising from life sciences research.
The Case for the Use of Red Lines in the Governance of Life Sciences ResearchAlgorithms & AtrocitiesHonors Thesis Presentations | June 5, 2025How Could States Use Nuclear Weapons? Four Models After the BombShadowing Cybersecurity: Expertise, Transnationalism, and the Politics of UncertaintyLawyering the Presidency: Legal Counsel and Constraints on the Use of ForceThe Missiles on Our Land: What 60 More Years of Land-Based Nuclear Missiles Mean for AmericaCISAC 40th AnniversaryRussia, Ukraine and NATO: The View from BerlinTechnology and the Rise of Great Powers: How Diffusion Shapes Economic CompetitionThe Trend Toward Militarization: How IOs Influence International Police ReformEconomic Security & Friendshoring in the Trump Age | Geopolitics of Tech Conference
CISAC Stanford (CISACStanford) |

The Case for the Use of "Red Lines" in the Governance of Life Sciences Research

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER