@AbundanceInstitute
  @AbundanceInstitute
Abundance Institute | The anti-encryption bills that almost banned privacy @AbundanceInstitute | Uploaded September 2024 | Updated October 2024, 4 minutes ago.
Did you know encryption was once classified as a weapon? Watch as we explore the fight to protect encryption in the face of government control.

Subscribe to Abundance Institute on YouTube ► youtube.com/channel/UCP0Pf2ycSsqtEhgJZeT4N2w
Sign up for our newsletter, coming soon ► https://linktr.ee/abundance.institute

It’s hard to believe now, but encryption was once considered so dangerous it was classified as a munition, subject to the same export controls as weapons. Lawmakers like Joe Biden and President Clinton pushed hard to regulate and even ban the technology, fearing that criminals could use it to communicate in secret. This sparked a decades-long debate: who gets to control powerful new technology?

Tech pioneers like Phil Zimmerman believed digital privacy was a fundamental right. In 1991, he created the open-source cryptology software Pretty Good Privacy (PGP) to help internet users keep their online communications to themselves.

Fast forward to today, and the encryption debate is still raging. As new technologies like AI enter the fold, we face a similar dilemma—how do we balance security with privacy? This episode dives deep into the lessons of the 1990s and their relevance for today’s technology policy debates.
The anti-encryption bills that almost banned privacyWe can 3D-print our way out of the housing crisis. Here’s how.Can AI Cut Red Tape? Estonia’s Paperwork-Free ApproachHarnessing AI for Public Good: Learn from Estonia’s AI-Enabled GovernmentWhat the war on pagers taught us about embracing changeIts time to shift the culture around emerging technology | Abundance InstituteNothing changes if nothing changes.AI is intelligent, but that doesn’t mean it’s smart | Dr. Melanie MitchellGive Nuclear a ChanceA long energy storage solution can help us jumpstart a green revolution. Heres how.This new, sustainable energy could save the planet, if regulators allow it | Abundance InstituteWe have a choice: To be satisfied with the status quo, or to build a better future.

The anti-encryption bills that almost banned privacy @AbundanceInstitute

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER