Uploaded August 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Patrick Bet-David reacts to CBC’s internal guidance on how journalists should describe the September 11 attacks and argues that the language goes beyond a media-style debate. He questions whether a government-funded broadcaster should avoid directly calling 9/11 a terrorist attack, especially as the 25th anniversary approaches. His broader point is that the controversy raises questions about media judgment, historical clarity, and what respect should look like between close allies.
Patrick Bet-David reacts to CBC’s internal guidance on how journalists should describe the September 11 attacks and argues that the language goes beyond a media-style debate. He questions whether a government-funded broadcaster should avoid directly calling 9/11 a terrorist attack, especially as the 25th anniversary approaches. His broader point is that the controversy raises questions about media judgment, historical clarity, and what respect should look like between close allies.
