Test-achats: a justified case of sexual discrimination?  @DavidLandonCole
Test-achats: a justified case of sexual discrimination?  @DavidLandonCole
David Landon Cole | Test-achats: a justified case of sexual discrimination? @DavidLandonCole | Uploaded March 2011 | Updated October 2024, 2 days ago.
dlandoncole.com
facebook.com/dlandoncole
twitter.com/dlandoncole


The ECJ's judgement: bit.ly/hyE7ei
The Charter of Fundamental Rights: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/charter/pdf/text_en.pdf
The EU Gender Directive 2004/113: http://www.aedh.eu/plugins/fckeditor/userfiles/file/Discriminations%20et%20droits%20des%20minorit%C3%A9s/Council%20directive%202004-113.pdf
Test-Achats press release on winning their case (in French): test-achats.be/assurances/assurances-et-discrimination-le-principe-d-egalite-des-sexes-est-absolu-s707083.htm
Interesting briefing on the issue by Clifford Chance LLP: cliffordchance.com/publicationviews/publications/2011/03/client_briefing_ontest-achatscasejudgment.html
Test-achats: a justified case of sexual discrimination?-gateEuropes not-so-super TuesdayMewtwo!I just passed my driving testLatumWays YouTube Survey TagMy take on the EU referendum #brexit #eurefResponding to CGreene34 on Julian Assange Faces The Death PenaltyWhat are my politics? Answers part twoDLC on the BBC: All change in Huntingdonshire?Hello from 2014Thunderf00t, Inc.

Test-achats: a justified case of sexual discrimination? @DavidLandonCole

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER