Terrence Howards 1x1=2 Proof is Incorrect @MadComputerScientist1
Terrence Howards 1x1=2 Proof is Incorrect  @MadComputerScientist1
Uploaded May 2024 | Updated September 2026, 2 hours ago
Looks like we have a new Euler everyone, except Euler never felt the need to solve 1*1. Mathematicians will all have to make way for the grand thinking of Terrence Howard.

While I applaud the actor for thinking about math and trying to work things out on his own, he has done so by misunderstanding the basic rules of algebra and trying to write new ones that don't exist.

But I'm a computer scientist. not a mathematician. Find out the things I missed or let me know the areas where I misspoke!
Terrence Howards 1x1=2 Proof is IncorrectUnbelievable ancient technology according to Uncharted XFaulty Logic Fridays: Another doomsday prophet says the world will endWhy AI chat bots hallucinate and how we can reduce itWhy Do AI Chatbots get the wrong answer and A Question for Michio KakuConspiracy Theorist thinks Artificial Intelligence is the AntichristOne weird trick for using Python to determine if a number is a power of another numberInternet prodigy predicts the first 100 days of Donald Trumps stable geniusacademics insert invisible prompts to force postive reviews and publicationNo, programmers did not program voting machines to favor Donald TrumpImplementing the Trial Division AlgorithmWhy an Atari 2600 game beating ChatGPT at Chess is expected
Mad Computer Scientist |

Terrence Howard's 1x1=2 Proof is Incorrect

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER