Uploaded June 2025 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Stuttgart Radio Symphony Orchestra conducted by Carl St Clair.
I - Allegro vivace: 0:00
II - Lento: 6:21
III - Scherzo. Allegro non troppo: 18:06
IV - Allegro preciso: 25:36
Villa-Lobos's Symphony No.7 was composed in 1945, written for a composition competition promoted by the Detroit Symphony Orchestra. In spite of being considered by the composer as one of his best works, it was not awarded any prize. It was premiered in London on March 27 of 1949, performed by the London Symphony Orchestra, conducted by the composer. The programme notes at the premiere contained a short and somewhat mystifying description, calling this symphony Odyssey of Peace, with the four movements entitled Prologue – Contrasts – Tragedy – Epilogue. These titles do not seem to bear a clear correspondence to the music and do not figure in the manuscript.
Nine years later, Villa-Lobos gave a similar title to a symphonic poem, Odyssey of a Race, dedicated to the State of Israel. The symphony is scored for a huge orchestra, with all sections doubled or tripled, a vast percussion section and an unusual array of piano, two harps and a Hammond Novachord, possibly the first electronic synthesizer. It is strongly balanced in favour of the massive wind section, and the strings are often on the brink of being submerged by its weight. But this does not invalidate the author’s own assessment of the symphony’s importance: it really is one of his most ambitious and significant statements, where the textural variety and free harmonic flow never obscure the sense of dramatic construction.
With the Revolution of 1930, Villa-Lobos became a notable cultural figure during the authoritarian government of Getúlio Vargas, conducting concerts through the country, writing patriotic music as well as leading an ambitious program of music education. It was at this point the composer firmly cimented his place as the most important Brazilian composer, as well as one of the most of all South-America. Villa-lobos's return to the genre of the symphony from 1944 onwards was done with a mature style and firmly established Brazilian language, comprised of modernism, Brazilian folk and popular music, as well as European elements and forms heavily modified to suit his style.
The first movement is written in sonata form. begins with a downward scale rush as in the symphonic poem "Uirapurú", answered by dissonant polytonal chords. This leads to the eposition of a vigorous and colourful main theme on full orchestra, unfolding in a daring contrapuntal way. Then a passionate and expressive second theme is introduced by strings, offering some melodic contrast in this largely atonal music. The main theme material is then developed, reaching a climax when both themes are in counterpoint (the main in woodwinds and the second on strings). A varied recapitulation of the main theme ensues, ending the allegro vivace with a decided coda.
The second movement is structured as a rondo (A-B-A'-C-A''-Coda). It opens with a sinuous and languous main theme presented by the bassoon, which is an anagram based on the word AMERICA (with D representing the letter R, B for the I, and F for the M). This motive also serves as a kind of ostinato for much of the lento. The second theme, introduced by woodwinds, is bucolic and folkish in shape. The main theme is then recapitulated in a varied way, leading to a climax as it becomes more rhythmic and agitated. The third theme is almost Mahlerian in its tragic tone, creating great contrast. The main theme is recapitulated by strings, growing into a broad and powerful climax. The music then gradually disintegrates in a dissolving coda.
The third movement is a scherzo. It begins with a rhythmic main theme based on the motive E-G-A-B, which is then unfolded through the entire allegro. Unlike a standard scherzo, we don't find a contrasting trio section but more secondary melodic ideas and themes. These appear to offer contrast but are quickly swept by the rhythmic drive of the music. A varied recapitulation of the theme leads to a richly scored climax. A striking chord then ends the scherzo.
The fourth movement is structured in a modified sonata form. It opens with a vigorously rhythmic main theme, presented between strings and woodwinds. A more melodic second theme is then introduced by the wood, then passing onto strings as it unfolds in a passionate and expressive way. The ensuing development is solely focused on the main theme, becoming more and more rhythmically complex. Then the main theme is recapitulated in a varied way, leading to a substantial fugato based again on the main theme. A lively and joyful coda ends the symphony in a brilliant way.
Picture: "Samba" (1925) by the Brazilian painter Emiliano Di Cavalcanti.
Musical analysis partially written by myself. Sources: tinyurl.com/2bvvvdm4, tinyurl.com/2d747ksx and tinyurl.com/2b5qopnt
Unfortunately, score is not freely available.
Stuttgart Radio Symphony Orchestra conducted by Carl St Clair.
I - Allegro vivace: 0:00
II - Lento: 6:21
III - Scherzo. Allegro non troppo: 18:06
IV - Allegro preciso: 25:36
Villa-Lobos's Symphony No.7 was composed in 1945, written for a composition competition promoted by the Detroit Symphony Orchestra. In spite of being considered by the composer as one of his best works, it was not awarded any prize. It was premiered in London on March 27 of 1949, performed by the London Symphony Orchestra, conducted by the composer. The programme notes at the premiere contained a short and somewhat mystifying description, calling this symphony Odyssey of Peace, with the four movements entitled Prologue – Contrasts – Tragedy – Epilogue. These titles do not seem to bear a clear correspondence to the music and do not figure in the manuscript.
Nine years later, Villa-Lobos gave a similar title to a symphonic poem, Odyssey of a Race, dedicated to the State of Israel. The symphony is scored for a huge orchestra, with all sections doubled or tripled, a vast percussion section and an unusual array of piano, two harps and a Hammond Novachord, possibly the first electronic synthesizer. It is strongly balanced in favour of the massive wind section, and the strings are often on the brink of being submerged by its weight. But this does not invalidate the author’s own assessment of the symphony’s importance: it really is one of his most ambitious and significant statements, where the textural variety and free harmonic flow never obscure the sense of dramatic construction.
With the Revolution of 1930, Villa-Lobos became a notable cultural figure during the authoritarian government of Getúlio Vargas, conducting concerts through the country, writing patriotic music as well as leading an ambitious program of music education. It was at this point the composer firmly cimented his place as the most important Brazilian composer, as well as one of the most of all South-America. Villa-lobos's return to the genre of the symphony from 1944 onwards was done with a mature style and firmly established Brazilian language, comprised of modernism, Brazilian folk and popular music, as well as European elements and forms heavily modified to suit his style.
The first movement is written in sonata form. begins with a downward scale rush as in the symphonic poem "Uirapurú", answered by dissonant polytonal chords. This leads to the eposition of a vigorous and colourful main theme on full orchestra, unfolding in a daring contrapuntal way. Then a passionate and expressive second theme is introduced by strings, offering some melodic contrast in this largely atonal music. The main theme material is then developed, reaching a climax when both themes are in counterpoint (the main in woodwinds and the second on strings). A varied recapitulation of the main theme ensues, ending the allegro vivace with a decided coda.
The second movement is structured as a rondo (A-B-A'-C-A''-Coda). It opens with a sinuous and languous main theme presented by the bassoon, which is an anagram based on the word AMERICA (with D representing the letter R, B for the I, and F for the M). This motive also serves as a kind of ostinato for much of the lento. The second theme, introduced by woodwinds, is bucolic and folkish in shape. The main theme is then recapitulated in a varied way, leading to a climax as it becomes more rhythmic and agitated. The third theme is almost Mahlerian in its tragic tone, creating great contrast. The main theme is recapitulated by strings, growing into a broad and powerful climax. The music then gradually disintegrates in a dissolving coda.
The third movement is a scherzo. It begins with a rhythmic main theme based on the motive E-G-A-B, which is then unfolded through the entire allegro. Unlike a standard scherzo, we don't find a contrasting trio section but more secondary melodic ideas and themes. These appear to offer contrast but are quickly swept by the rhythmic drive of the music. A varied recapitulation of the theme leads to a richly scored climax. A striking chord then ends the scherzo.
The fourth movement is structured in a modified sonata form. It opens with a vigorously rhythmic main theme, presented between strings and woodwinds. A more melodic second theme is then introduced by the wood, then passing onto strings as it unfolds in a passionate and expressive way. The ensuing development is solely focused on the main theme, becoming more and more rhythmically complex. Then the main theme is recapitulated in a varied way, leading to a substantial fugato based again on the main theme. A lively and joyful coda ends the symphony in a brilliant way.
Picture: "Samba" (1925) by the Brazilian painter Emiliano Di Cavalcanti.
Musical analysis partially written by myself. Sources: tinyurl.com/2bvvvdm4, tinyurl.com/2d747ksx and tinyurl.com/2b5qopnt
Unfortunately, score is not freely available.

![Symphony No.9 Sinfonia Sacra - Edmund Rubbra
BBC National Orchestra & Chorus of Wales conducted by Richard Hickox. Lynne Dawson as the soprano, Della Jones as the contralto and Stephen Roberts as the baritone.
I - Prelude (0:00) - Crux fidelis (3:18) - Almighty Lord we pray thee (7:11) - Now in the place where he was crucified (9:35) - Peter wen forth (18:01) - Regina coeli (26:59) - And behold, two of them went (30:12) - Conversation piece (30:37) - And Jesus led them (34:27) - Viri Galilaei (39:09)
Rubbras Symphony No.9 (subtitled The Resurrection) was conceived on March 1961, from an oratorio suggestion from his publisher Bernard de Nevers. The composer was also inspired by the painting The Risen Christ (c. 1490) by the Italian painter Bartolomeo Suardi Bramantino. The project advanced with increasing difficulty until Rubbra completed Symphony No.8 on 1968, by then the oratorio turned symphony that was finished on Good Friday of 1972. It was premiered on February 30 of 1973, performed by the Royal Liverpool Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by Sir Charles Groves. The soloists were Miriam Bowen, Norma Procter and Benjamin Luxon. Rubbra regarded the Sinfonia Sacra as his most personal achievement.
Written in a single continuous movement, the symphony tells the story of the Resurrection: the death on the cross, the entombment, the rolling away of the rock, and the appearance of the risen Christ to the disciples at Emmaus. The formal design of the piece reflects the Bach Passions, although of course the narrative follows on from these. Rubbra also decided to use a contralto, rather than a tenor, for the role of Evangelist as this would both give a fresh timbre to the very traditional role, and emphasize the importance of women in this part of the gospel narrative.
The symphony is divided into four sections, each ending with a Latin hymn (set by Rubbra). Formal unity is achieved through the recurrent use of motives and intervals rather than by a more symphonic development of the thematic material. Additionally, at the end of three sections a Lutheran chorale is included, seamlessly following the preceding hymn. The choice of Catholic hymns and Protestant chorals is important as a conscious symbol of the unification of the two sides of the Western Christian tradition.
The prelude depicts the text There was darkness over all the earth until the ninth hour given at the head of the score and sets the scene for Christs cry of despair at the Crucifixion Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani? In the composer’s words: From these opening chords spring not only the basic tonal centres of the work but the intervals that shape so much of the vocal writing. The orchestral interlude after Christ’s last words on the Cross leads into the Latin hymn Crux fidelis and a wonderful chorale tune by Johannes Crüger ends the first section.
The second part narrates the discovery of the empty tomb by the two Marys and includes a magical echo chorus of divisi tenors. It concludes with the ecstatically set Latin hymn Resurrexi, et adhunc tecum sum. The narration now continues into the next section which introduces a small but crucial part for soprano (Mary Magdalene) where the story of the mistaken identity and then recognition of Christ in the garden is told in austerely beautiful music. This part ends with the Latin hymn Regina caeli and a chorale by Melchior Teschner.
After the momentous events of the Crucifixion and Resurection, the mood of the text changes and, following a brief spoken introduction, the only musical break in the work, a purely orchestral interlude entitled Conversation Piece follows. This shows Rubbra at his most Holstian and, as people would converse while walking, the same musical ideas often walk together but at different speeds. The final part follows the narration to the ascension of Christ and ends with the Latin hymn Viri Galilei beautifully set with an accompaniment of bell-like violin figurations. A chorale by Hans Leo Haßler ends this deeply meditative work in an affirmative A Major.
[Activate subtitles in order to follow the lyrics]
Pictures: [Left] The Entombment of Christ (1603-4) by Italian painter Caravaggio. [Centre] The Risen Christ (c. 1490) by Italian painter Bartolomeo Suardi Bramantino. [Right] The Ascension (1801) by the British-American painter Benjamin West.
Source: https://tinyurl.com/2d4u4hmt
Unfortunately, the score isnt freely available. Symphony No.9 Sinfonia Sacra - Edmund Rubbra](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/b2CDjqBhGYk/mqdefault.jpg)
![The Cenci Opera Music - Havergal Brian
The Millennium Sinfonia conducted by James Kelleher. For a list of singers: https://tinyurl.com/2ybd2wwo
I - Act I. Overture Preludio Tragico (0:00) - Scene I. An apartment in the Cenci palace (13:56) - Scene II. A garden of the Cenci palace (22:44) - Scene III. A magnificent hall in the Cenci palace (30:29) - Scene IV. An apartment in the castle of Petrella (40:55) - Scene V. Before the castle of Petrella (50:12) - Scene VI. An apartment in Orsinos palace (1:10:11) - Scene VII. The Hall of Justice (1:16:27) - Scene VIII. A hall of the prison (1:26:22)
Brians The Cenci was composed between 1951-2, but the composer never saw the work performed in his lifetime. The overture, fanfares and a flourish can be performed as independent pieces. The opera was premiered in a concert performance on December 12 of 1997, in an occassion marking the 25th anniversary of the death of Brian. This recording was made from that performance.
Structured in a single act with eight scenes, the work is based on the 1819 verse drama The Cenci, by English author Percy Bysshe Shelley. The story centres on Count Francesco Cenci, who is notorious for his depravity. He gives a party at which, to the horror of his guests, he gleefully announces the deaths of two of his sons. Another victim of his cruelty is his daughter Beatrice, whom he has raped. Beatrice enlists the help of Orsino, a priest and Roman nobleman whom she had once hoped to marry. With the approval of the Cenci family, Orsino plots the murder of the count. When the other conspirators are found out, Orsino evades capture; the rest are tried and executed.
Brian’s approach to The Cenci was to cut and omit much material, focusing on the bare essentials of the action. The numerous elisions, ranging from the wholesale omission of Acts 2 and 3 to judicious trimmings of words in many places elsewhere, have the effect of paring the drama to its essentials and drawing it tightly together. Clearly he saw his Cenci as a work into which audiences could be drawn, in very real opera houses – and with the principal characters of Cenci and Beatrice vividly etched in musical terms, with their own clearly identifiable thematic identities.
Although a continuous structure, Brian’s dramatic sequence of scenes divides in two, pivoting around the offstage murder of the Count during scene 5; indeed, all the violent or gruesome activity – including the Count’s abuse of Beatrice, the murders (scene 1 opens in the aftermath of an unspecified killing that the Count has perpetrated) and the papal court’s torturing of the criminals – takes place out of view. This mirrors the reluctance by Shelley to specify the Count’s incest, though the fact of some ill-treatment by her father is mentioned in the letter Beatrice requests Orsino put before the Pope; Orsino, of course, has other plans.
For a more detailed analysis of plot and music: https://tinyurl.com/2axqvxmq
To see the libretto and lyrics: https://tinyurl.com/2axqvxmq
Pictures: [left] Last moments of Beatrice Cenci (c. 1880) by Italian painter Guerrino Guardabassi. [centre] Coat of arms of the Cenci family. [right] Woman wearing a turban (c. 1650, sitter claimed to be Beatrice herself), attributed to Italian painter Ginevra Cantofoli.
Sources: https://tinyurl.com/2axqvxmq and https://tinyurl.com/26fzmysp
Unfortunately the score isnt freely available. The Cenci Opera Music - Havergal Brian](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/b9dEB2HO5mA/mqdefault.jpg)

![Symphony No.4 in C major (1947 Revised Version) - Sergei Prokofiev
Scottish National Orchestra conducted by Neeme Järvi.
I - Andante - Allegro eroico - Poco meno mosso - Tempo I - Meno mosso - Poco meno mosso - Allegretto (𝅘𝅥 = 69) - Allegro eroico - Poco meno mosso - Più mosso (Allegro eroico) - Moderato - Allegro eroico - Andante - Allegro eroico - Poco meno mosso - Allegro eroico - Allegretto - Poco più mosso - Allegro eroico: 0:00
II - Andante tranquillo (𝅘𝅥 = 52) - Più mosso - Più largamente - Larghetto: 12:54
III - Moderato, quasi allegretto (𝅘𝅥 = 108) - Pochissimo sostenuto - Meno mosso (𝅘𝅥 = 96) - Tempo I - Andante (𝅘𝅥 = 69) - Poco più mosso (Moderato) - Andante assai - Moderato - Meno mosso: 22:08
IV - Allegro risoluto - Meno allegro - Andantino - Allegro come prima - Coda. Listesso tempo. Ben accentuato e con brio - Moderato, brioso: 28:00
Prokofievs Symphony No.4 was composed between 1929-30, being largely based on material from the ballet The Prodigal Son (1928-9). The piece was coldly received at its premiere in Boston on November 14 of 1930, and the same reactions followed in Europe and the Soviet Union. Despite the poor reception, Prokofiev thought the material had great potential. In 1947, Prokofiev completed a thorough revision of the piece. It was premiered in a radio broadcast in London on March 11 of 1950, performed by the BBC Symphony Orchestra conducted by Sir Adrian Boult. In the Soviet Union it was premiered in Moscow on January 5 of 1957, performed by the USSR State Symphony Orchestra conducted by Gennady Rozhdestvensky.
Compared with the rather modest ambition of the original version, the revised one is longer and its orchestration is expanded with an E-flat Clarinet, one extra trumpet, piano, triangle, tambourine, and wood blocks and harp. Its style also departs from the original dance-like neoclassical language towards socialist realism, that is, more grand, bombastic, and heroic, resembling his recent epic wartime Symphony No.5, which had enjoyed great favour in Soviet official circles. The material is mostly augmented, transitions are added throughout the piece and the development of the themes is more substantial.
Unfortunately for Prokofiev, the success he enjoyed during the war years was short-lived. As the patriotic fervour waned, tight governmental control of the arts returned with an iron fist. Four months later in 1948, a devastating and fierce anti-formalist campaign was launched against some of the then most prominent soviet composers like Shostakovich, Prokofiev, Kachaturian or Myaskovsky. Prokofievs career never truly recovered from such campaign; many of his works were banned and the new compositions, written to appease soviet authorities failed to relaunch his career. By August 1948, Prokofiev was in severe financial straits, his personal debt amounting to 180,000 rubles.
The first movement is written in sonata form, being the most modified and expanded in the revision. It begins with an andante introduction dominated by a warmly melodic theme on woodwinds. The main allegro then starts with a wilful and vigorous main theme on full orchestra. After a transition, a deeply lyrical second is introduced by flute over strings. The development starts with urgent and agitated fragments of the main theme, reaching a solemn climax with the return of the introduction material. The second one soon follows before the main one dominates it and leads us to an intense climax coronated with brass fanfares. The themes are then recapitulated, before a vigorous and determined coda closes the allegro.
The second movement is written as a slow rondo (A-B-C-B-A-D-A-Coda), the material being augmented and its exposition more spread. It opens with a peaceful and contemplative main theme shared between woods and strings. Follows a more chromatic and menacing second theme in form of a march, soon contrasted by a lyrical and nocturnal third theme introduced by the clarinet. The second theme is then recapitulated in a varied way, followed by the main one in a radiant and hopeful way. The introduction material from the first movement then suddenly returns in an expressive climax. Then the main theme is recapitulated in the ensuing passionate climax, right before the andante ends with a serene coda.
[Musical analysis continued in the comments section].
Picture: Fantasy (1925) by the Russian painter Kuzma Petrov-Vodkin.
Musical analysis partially written by myself. Sources: https://tinyurl.com/229uuxgc and https://tinyurl.com/23fronrc
To check the score: https://tinyurl.com/2blj755v Symphony No.4 in C major (1947 Revised Version) - Sergei Prokofiev](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/bhBkDkkUh90/mqdefault.jpg)

![Symphony No.9 - Vagn Holmboe
Aarhus Symphony Orchestra conducted by Owain Arwel Hughes.
I - Allegro fluente (𝅘𝅥 = c. 112) - Meno mosso (𝅘𝅥 = c. 92) - A tempo I (𝅘𝅥 = c. 112) - Pesante - Meno mosso (𝅘𝅥 = c. 92) 0:00
II - Intermezzo I. Quieto (𝅘𝅥𝅮 = c. 96) 8:47
III - Allegro con fuoco (𝅗𝅥 = c. 96) - Con fuoco (𝅗𝅥 = c. 120) - A tempo (𝅗𝅥 = c. 96) - Meno mosso (𝅘𝅥 = c. 108): 12:46
IV - Intermezzo II. Quieto (𝅘𝅥 = c. 96): 19:38
V - Andante austero (𝅘𝅥 = c. 80) - Più mosso (𝅘𝅥 = c. 100) - Poco largamente: 23:41
Holmboes Symphony No.9 was composed between 1967-8, being commissioned from the Danish Broadcasting Corporation. It was premiered on December 19 of 1968, performed by the Danish National Radio Symphony Orchestra conducted by Herbert Blomstedt. The score was subsequently revised in 1969, being dedicated to famous French musician and teacher Nadia Boulanger. In the 1950s she visited Copenhagen on several occasions to give lectures and conduct, and Holmboe met her there. Structured in five movements, the work shows the composers continued use of the Metamorphosis technique in a more concentred form.
Holmboes Metamorphosis is an original structural principle in which the material is continually being transformed from one state to another, gradually reaching a total change, without losing its identity or its fundamental characteristics. The correspondence with natures continuous transformation of matter is striking, and the material which Holmboe introduces into the process of change is most usually a musical embryo, a thematic, motivic or rhythmical idea. Throughout a lifelong development he unwaveringly kept to a modal-diatonic basis (twelve tone music and serialism appealed little to him) but the principle has striking similarities with the constructive principles employed by Schoenberg and his pupils.
The Ninth symphony marks the beginning of the last, mature phase in Holmboes symphonic output, a phase characterised, in the words of his younger Danish fellow-composer Karl Aage Rasmussen, by a new transparency in the musical architecture and an almost Impressionistic refinement of tone colour. Structured in five movements with two alternating intermezzi, this pattern is similar as the three intemedios of the single-movement Seventh Symphony. It is music that is at once concentrated and expansive, austere and expressive, intensely concentrated and wildly ecstatic.
The first movement is rather free in form. It begins with the exposition of several motives such as pedal notes on oboe and ascending string figures. These gradually coalesce into a rarefied and rather abstract theme, which becomes the subject (or rather its fragmenting motives) of a series of continuous metamorphosic transformations, gradually changing and evolving in nuance, tempo, dynamics and orchestral colours. The music verges between moments of severe austerity (such as the central section) and almost expressionistic passages of great agitation. The allegro ends with an enigmatic coda that seems to recall the opening motives.
The second movement is the first intermezzo for a small set of string and wood soloists. It opens with sinuous and sinister ostinato figures on strings, soon in counterpoint with woodwinds. The music has a certain otherworldliness, remaining always on piano or pianissimo. The movement ends in the same rarefied way it has unfolded.
The third movement is rather diffuse in terms of form. It begins with bass clarinet introducing a motive over tremolo strings, which is the basis of the ensuing allegro con fuoco. As in the first movement, this material is subjected to development based on the Metamorphosis technique. Climaxes of great dissonance and ferocity alternate and contrast with melodic passages of austere expression. An imperious climax is reached near the end, followed by a slow and meditative coda that seems to end in a mysterious way before a sudden crescendo.
The fourth movement is the second intermezzo in form of an arch, otherwise very similar as the first but scored for solo strings. A long-drawn melodic theme is presented and unfolded in pianissimo, becoming more lyrical and expressive as the soloist turn more virtuosic. There is a certain Nordic quality in the music, perceptible beyond the austerity and restraint. An evocative fade-out coda ends the intermezzo.
[Musical analysis continued in the comments section]
Picture: Reclining Woman or The Great Bather (1922) by Léopold Survage.
Musical analysis written by myself. Source: https://tinyurl.com/287ddzxo
To check the score: https://tinyurl.com/28jczska Symphony No.9 - Vagn Holmboe](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/cAq0DCBFWEE/mqdefault.jpg)



![O magnum mysterium Polychoral Motet - Giovanni Gabrieli
Concerto Palatino & Studio de musique ancienne de Montréal conducted by Christopher Jackson.
I - 0:00
Gabrielis O magnum mysterium was published in Volume I of Concerti di Andrea et di Giovanni Gabrieli in Venice on 1587, a volume mostly dedicated to the works of his uncle Andrea Gabrieli, but also includes Giovannis first motets. These early works show much influence of his uncles style in the use of dialogue and echo effects. In its original form, it is scored for eight voices separated in two groups of four. The first with a cantus, altus, tenor and bassus. The second for an altus, two tenors and a bassus. The text is drawn from the Matins of Christmas in the Roman Breviary.
Just as many European composers beat a trail to Venice to study with the renowned musicians there, the Venetian Giovanni Gabrieli’s earliest studies were with his uncle Andrea, at St Mark’s, before he travelled north to Munich to learn from the esteemed and influential Orlando de Lassus. Returning to Venice, he was appointed to St Mark’s as organist and subsequently, following his uncle’s death, as principal composer. Gabrielis career rose further when he took the additional post of organist at the Scuola Grande di San Rocco, another post he retained for his entire life. San Rocco was the most prestigious and wealthy of all the Venetian confraternities, and second only to San Marco itself in the splendour of its musical establishment.
The popular historical imagination has long nourished a fascination with the cori spezzati (split choir) traditions of Venices San Marco Cathedral. Well-known complexities of this churchs architecture provide numerous locations for the placement of musical ensembles: multiple choir lofts around the altar, elevated galleries, and even oversized, raised pulpits. Though more sober historical analysis has tempered earlier concepts of a nearly Berliozian disposition of performing forces in San Marco, several generations of Venetian musicians cultivated music that exploits the contrasts between antiphonal groups. The trend culminates in the splendid polychoral motets of Andrea and Giovanni Gabrieli.
O magnum mysterium consistently and classically counterpoises two contrasting vocal choirs while maintaining its elegant proportions. Gabrieli divides his text, which celebrates the lowliness of Christs birth on Christmas, into three unequal parts; each receives a musical section of roughly equal length. The opening phrase, O great mystery, is sung three times: once by the first choir, once by the slightly lower second choir, and a third time in climactic full polyphony. The second phrase of text, which explains that the great mystery and wondrous sacrament allowed mere animals to see the birth of the Saviour, takes the same tripartite structure, with a temporal broadening into triple rhythmic groups.
The composer packs the most text into the third section, which extols the manger and the blessed Virgin; twice Gabrieli cycles the contrasted vocal choirs, once aspirantly starting with the lower ensemble and rising to the heights. The choral antiphony becomes thus not only a vehicle for grand effect, but also serves to articulate the very structure of the text and to embody its sense. The radiant conclusion of his motet comes in a fourth section, an extended jubilant alleluia. A series of syncopated, triple-meter antiphonal statements gradually gives way to a broad, eight-voiced tutti. Whether the two choirs braved the logistical challenges of physical separation or merely sang in proximate alternation, the effect added great lustre to the Venetian liturgy.
[Activate subtitles to see the lyrics in Latin/English].
Picture: Adoration of the Shepherds (c. 1580) by the Italian painter Jacopo Bassano.
Source: https://tinyurl.com/2chnmus3
To check the score: https://tinyurl.com/28sw4xo7 O magnum mysterium Polychoral Motet - Giovanni Gabrieli](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/cjgzX6FLWds/mqdefault.jpg)