Uploaded November 2025 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
BBC National Orchestra of Wales conducted by Richard Hickox.
I - Lento (sempre flessibile) - Allegretto: 0:00
II - Canto. Largo e sereno - (attacca): 9:19
III - Vivace impetuoso: 17:43
IV - Poco andante - Allegro moderato: 23:32
Rubbra's Symphony No.6 was composed between 1953-4, being commissioned by the Royal Philharmonic Society. It was premiered at the Royal Festival Hall in London on November 17 of 1954, performed by the BBC Symphony Orchestra conducted by Sir Malcolm Sargent. The Symphony contains ideas similar to those encountered in the Second, the music even begins in the same tonal area: D minor, but the sound-world is very different. At the head of the score the following motive is inscribed: E-F-A-B, the basis from which the entire symphony is built upon. The first three movements draws on two or three of the four notes, while the fourth presents it in full right in the beginning.
Rubbra's symphonies differ from the prevailing model of the symphony in that they are built on a principle of continuous, organic development from a single basic idea. By contrast, the traditional symphony is built on dramatic lines, with contrasting movements, each of which usually has contrasting themes as its main character. The symphony arose during a time which rebelled against counterpoint, while Rubbra's intention was to use the example of the great contrapuntal music of the English madrigalists for his model, capturing something of the modal feeling of English folk and church music by the false relationships between parts. Thus, Rubbra's symphonies form themselves according to the logic of their main idea, rather than fitting into the standard symphonic shape.
The first movement only vaguely resembles sonata form. It begins with a lento introduction with the opening chord featuring the first three notes from the motive (E-F-A) on harp, horns, bassoon and timpani. From this lyrical and nostalgic main theme is exposed by strings, seamlessly leading to the ensuing 6/8 allegretto. A joyous and vigorous rhythmic theme is presented by full orchestra, soon followed by a more melodic variation. As said before, the music is not built on a pair of contrasting themes developed dramatically, but on the organic and continuous growth of the initial ideas. An animated and luminous climax is reached, followed by a recapitulation of the themes that ends with a slow and contemplative coda.
The second movement is written in form of an arch, prefaced by lines of the great Italian poet Leopardi: Sempre caro mi fu quest’ermo colle / E questa siepe, che da tante parte / Dell’ultimo orizzonte il guardo esclude. (Always was this lonely hill dear to me / And this hedge which shuts out / So much of the distant horizon.) It opens with a the notes A and E from the aforementioned motive, which serve as the basis of a lyrical, static main theme presented by solo clarinet, muted horns and divided cellos. Structural and expressive tensions are subtly increased as the music progresses, the whole movement being a long-breathed song. The composer likened Leopardi’s lines to the view from his studio in the Chilterns where the symphony was written, but it also charts an inner spiritual landscape whose tranquillity of spirit and language almost recall the Missa in honorem Sancti Dominic (1948). After a powerful and expressive climax, the largo leads into the next part.
The third movement is a scherzo. It begins with a vigorously rhythmic main theme on strings, based on the first two notes of the motive (E-F), but the texture is soon lightened by a carolling figure on harp, celesta and clarinets. A foretaste of the "magic" music of the late Tenth and Eleventh Symphonies, as is the dancing character of the ideas and the subtle, elusive, metrical sense. In absence of a contrasting trio, the material is contrapuntally unfolded with more melodic ideas. As the late Hugh Ottaway put it, the primary impulse in the symphony "remains melodic and contrapuntal, but with greater emphasis on harmonic texture and therefore colour". A serene, almost bucolic coda ends the scherzo.
The fourth movement is divided in two clear parts. It opens with the four-note motive being fully exposed in an English horn solo, serving as the basis of a poignant and lyrical theme that is gradually presented between English horn and strings. The allegro moderato starts with a sudden change of pace, with a determined and agitated variation of the theme appearing and unfolding with sudden contrasts in colour and mood. A contemplative, horn-dominated passage offers some contrast, leading to a varied recapitulation of the rhythmic variation of the theme. A joyous and animated coda brings the work to an affirmative close.
Picture: "Landscape of the Moon's Last Phase" (1944) by British painter Paul Nash.
Sources: tinyurl.com/27wuox8z and tinyurl.com/27ku9kdk
Unfortunately, the score isn't freely available.
BBC National Orchestra of Wales conducted by Richard Hickox.
I - Lento (sempre flessibile) - Allegretto: 0:00
II - Canto. Largo e sereno - (attacca): 9:19
III - Vivace impetuoso: 17:43
IV - Poco andante - Allegro moderato: 23:32
Rubbra's Symphony No.6 was composed between 1953-4, being commissioned by the Royal Philharmonic Society. It was premiered at the Royal Festival Hall in London on November 17 of 1954, performed by the BBC Symphony Orchestra conducted by Sir Malcolm Sargent. The Symphony contains ideas similar to those encountered in the Second, the music even begins in the same tonal area: D minor, but the sound-world is very different. At the head of the score the following motive is inscribed: E-F-A-B, the basis from which the entire symphony is built upon. The first three movements draws on two or three of the four notes, while the fourth presents it in full right in the beginning.
Rubbra's symphonies differ from the prevailing model of the symphony in that they are built on a principle of continuous, organic development from a single basic idea. By contrast, the traditional symphony is built on dramatic lines, with contrasting movements, each of which usually has contrasting themes as its main character. The symphony arose during a time which rebelled against counterpoint, while Rubbra's intention was to use the example of the great contrapuntal music of the English madrigalists for his model, capturing something of the modal feeling of English folk and church music by the false relationships between parts. Thus, Rubbra's symphonies form themselves according to the logic of their main idea, rather than fitting into the standard symphonic shape.
The first movement only vaguely resembles sonata form. It begins with a lento introduction with the opening chord featuring the first three notes from the motive (E-F-A) on harp, horns, bassoon and timpani. From this lyrical and nostalgic main theme is exposed by strings, seamlessly leading to the ensuing 6/8 allegretto. A joyous and vigorous rhythmic theme is presented by full orchestra, soon followed by a more melodic variation. As said before, the music is not built on a pair of contrasting themes developed dramatically, but on the organic and continuous growth of the initial ideas. An animated and luminous climax is reached, followed by a recapitulation of the themes that ends with a slow and contemplative coda.
The second movement is written in form of an arch, prefaced by lines of the great Italian poet Leopardi: Sempre caro mi fu quest’ermo colle / E questa siepe, che da tante parte / Dell’ultimo orizzonte il guardo esclude. (Always was this lonely hill dear to me / And this hedge which shuts out / So much of the distant horizon.) It opens with a the notes A and E from the aforementioned motive, which serve as the basis of a lyrical, static main theme presented by solo clarinet, muted horns and divided cellos. Structural and expressive tensions are subtly increased as the music progresses, the whole movement being a long-breathed song. The composer likened Leopardi’s lines to the view from his studio in the Chilterns where the symphony was written, but it also charts an inner spiritual landscape whose tranquillity of spirit and language almost recall the Missa in honorem Sancti Dominic (1948). After a powerful and expressive climax, the largo leads into the next part.
The third movement is a scherzo. It begins with a vigorously rhythmic main theme on strings, based on the first two notes of the motive (E-F), but the texture is soon lightened by a carolling figure on harp, celesta and clarinets. A foretaste of the "magic" music of the late Tenth and Eleventh Symphonies, as is the dancing character of the ideas and the subtle, elusive, metrical sense. In absence of a contrasting trio, the material is contrapuntally unfolded with more melodic ideas. As the late Hugh Ottaway put it, the primary impulse in the symphony "remains melodic and contrapuntal, but with greater emphasis on harmonic texture and therefore colour". A serene, almost bucolic coda ends the scherzo.
The fourth movement is divided in two clear parts. It opens with the four-note motive being fully exposed in an English horn solo, serving as the basis of a poignant and lyrical theme that is gradually presented between English horn and strings. The allegro moderato starts with a sudden change of pace, with a determined and agitated variation of the theme appearing and unfolding with sudden contrasts in colour and mood. A contemplative, horn-dominated passage offers some contrast, leading to a varied recapitulation of the rhythmic variation of the theme. A joyous and animated coda brings the work to an affirmative close.
Picture: "Landscape of the Moon's Last Phase" (1944) by British painter Paul Nash.
Sources: tinyurl.com/27wuox8z and tinyurl.com/27ku9kdk
Unfortunately, the score isn't freely available.


![Cantate Domino Motet - Giovanni Gabrieli
Gesualdo Consort Amsterdam conducted by Wim Becu.
I - 0:00
Gabrielis Cantate Domino was published in Volume I of Symphoniae sacrae I. Printed in Venice on 1597, the collection comprises a large number of works of sacred and secular nature; 45 motets (ranging from between 6 and 16 voices), 16 canzonas and sonatas. These works show Gabrieli departing from the influences of his uncle Andrea, as found in the works of the 1587 Concerti collection, wich would culminate in the works of Symphoniae sacrae II, published posthumously on 1615 and which represent Gabrielis magnum opus. In its original form, Cantate Domino is scored for a single choir of six voices a cappella, which is quite modest compared to the larger and more ambitious motets of the volume.
Just as many European composers beat a trail to Venice to study with the renowned musicians there, the Venetian Giovanni Gabrieli’s earliest studies were with his uncle Andrea, at St Mark’s, before he travelled north to Munich to learn from the esteemed and influential Orlando de Lassus. Returning to Venice, he was appointed to St Mark’s as organist and subsequently, following his uncle’s death, as principal composer. Gabrielis career rose further when he took the additional post of organist at the Scuola Grande di San Rocco, another post he retained for his entire life. San Rocco was the most prestigious and wealthy of all the Venetian confraternities, and second only to San Marco itself in the splendour of its musical establishment.
San Marco had a long tradition of musical excellence and Gabrielis work there made him one of the most noted composers in Europe. The vogue that began with his influential volume Sacrae symphoniae (1597) was such that composers from all over Europe, especially from Germany, came to Venice to study. Evidently, he also instructed his new pupils to study the madrigals being written in Italy, so not only did they carry back the grand Venetian polychoral style to their home countries, but also the more intimate style of madrigals; Heinrich Schütz and others helped transport the transitional early Baroque music north to Germany, a trend that decisively affected subsequent music history. The productions of the German Baroque, culminating in the music of J.S. Bach, were founded on this strong tradition, which had its roots in Venice.
The motet sets verses from Psalm 96 in Latin, celebrating the joy of singing to the Lord. The texture alternates between homophonic declamation (ideal for textual clarity) and contrapuntal imitative passages, giving the work both ceremonial weight and rhythmic vitality. The harmonic language, though rooted in Renaissance modality, incorporates bold sonorities and cadential gestures that anticipate early Baroque expressiveness. The piece’s structure reflects Gabrieli’s mastery of large-scale architecture: short, jubilant motifs move between the voices, often answered by fuller tutti sections that heighten the sense of celebration. Instrumental doubling was likely intended, reinforcing the choral lines and adding brilliance to climactic moments.
[Activate subtitles to see the lyrics in Latin/English].
Picture: La Gloria (also known as The Trinity, The Final Judgement, Paradise, and Adoration of the Trinity) by the Italian painter Titian (1551-4)
Sources: https://tinyurl.com/2chnmus3 and Copilot GPT-5
To check the score: https://tinyurl.com/2754xmkd Cantate Domino Motet - Giovanni Gabrieli](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ee4BOUQuNe4/mqdefault.jpg)

![The Titan Symphonic Poem in D major (1893 Weimar Version) - Gustav Mahler
Pannon Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by Zsolt Hamar.
Teil I: Aus den Tagen der Jugend, Blumen, Frucht und Dornenstücke
I - Frühling und kein Ende. Langsam, schleppend, wie ein Naturlaut - Immer sehr gemächlich: 0:00
II - Blumine. Andante allegretto: 14:34
III - Mit vollen Segeln. Kräftig bewegt, doch nicht zu schnell - Recht gemächlich: 21:10
Teil II: Commedia Humana
IV - Des Jägers Leichenbegängnis, ein Totenmarsch in Callots Manier. Feierlich und gemessen, ohne zu schleppen - Sehr einfach und schlicht wie eine Volksweise - Wieder etwas bewegter, wie im Anfang: 28:24
V - Dall inferno al Paradiso. Stürmisch bewegt - Energisch: 38:37
Mahlers The Titan was composed between 1887-8, initially conceived as a symphonic poem in two parts. It was premiered in Budapest on November 20 of 1889, performed by the Budapest Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by the composer. It was badly received by critics and audiences alike, bewildered by the style and lack of any descriptive notes from the composer. Mahler subsequently revised the score multiple times, until it reached its definitive form in 1896 as a symphony. All programmatic elements were dropped, the second movement was removed and the orchestration was expanded.
The work was inspired by Jean Pauls The Titan, but more than the novel itself its character called Roquairol: a romantic anti-hero gifted with a burning artistic desire that the world has no use for, and who, finding no outlet or ability to adapt, gives way to despair and suicide. Mahler apparently identified with this figure. Roquairol is talented and charismatic, but burnt-out, inwardly empty, and dissipated. He is intended to represent a contemporary type of cynical, self-destructive genius. On the other hand, the music barely fits in this narrative, and specially the triumphal conclusion seems to contradict it. Actually most of it was accumulated from various earlier works with no intended program, so its understandable Mahler reworked the project into an abstract symphony.
The first movement is structured in a modified sonata form. It begins with a slow introduction that represents the awakening of nature. Several motives are introduced that are the basis of the work; over sustained strings a descending two-note idea on woodwinds, a radiant brass call, a solemn chorale on horns, and a two-note cuckoo call on the clarinet. The main allegro begins with a gentle and pastoral main theme on cellos, derived from the two-note motive. A rhythmic and jovial second theme is also introduced. The material was largely reused from the lied Ging heut morgens übers Feld of Mahlers Songs of a Wayfarer.
The development opens with a variation of the introduction with its two-note motive and cuckoo calls. Horns introduce a solemn march theme that leads to the transformation of the main themes in a combined form. The music then grows more intense and agitated, foreshadowing the finale, until reaching an explosive climax. The fanfare theme then leads us to the joyful recapitulation of the themes. A playful coda, derived from the two-note motive, ends with in high spirits. The movement in its initial concept was a song of Spring that represents the awakening of nature or figuratively the birth of the Titan, the hero presented in the work.
The second movement is written in ternary form, being later removed by Mahler. It opens with string tremolos, followed by a widely lyrical and romantic main theme on the trumpet, extracted from Mahlers incidental music to the play The Trumpeter of Säckingen. The central section features a more contemplative and melancholic second theme on woodwinds, unfolding like a nocturne. It then takes the form of a waltz before leading to an expressive climax. The trumpet recapitulates the main theme, before it gradually fragments. The music then vanishes with high strings and three chords from the harp. In this movement, the titan falls in love and plays the trumpet that is heard through the night as a kind of romantic serenade to his loved one.
The third movement is a scherzo in ternary form. It begins with a rhythmic main theme in form of a vigorous and rowdy ländler, a dance of Germanic origin. It bears a resemblance to the lieder Hans und Grete, which would later for part in the first volume of Lieder und Gesänge aus der Jugendzeit. After a boisterous climax, the trio opens with a lyrical second theme in form of a waltz. The scherzo is then recapitulated in a shorter, more heavily orchestrated way. A brilliant coda ends the movement. Here the Titan fully experiences the joys and sadness of life, but is ultimately left unsatisfied.
[Analysis continued in the comments section]
Picture: Hercules and the Hydra (1921) by the American-British painter John Singer Sargent.
Musical analysis partially written by myself. Sources: https://tinyurl.com/yosee6t2, https://tinyurl.com/ym7h473p and https://bit.ly/2Uo1nZO
Score: https://tinyurl.com/ycpzgkhf The Titan Symphonic Poem in D major (1893 Weimar Version) - Gustav Mahler](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ev2LVB_loL0/mqdefault.jpg)
![Symphony No.3 in C minor - Sergei Prokofiev
Scottish National Orchestra conducted by Neeme Järvi.
I - Moderato (𝅘𝅥. = 104) - Un poco più tranquillo - Poco più mosso - Poco meno - Più mosso - Più animato - Meno mosso - Poco meno mosso (Moderato): 0:00
II - Andante - Poco più mosso - Largo: 14:33
III - Allegro agitato - Più mosso - Tempo I - Allegretto - Pochissimo più animato - Poco meno mosso - Allegro agitato - Meno mosso: 21:38
IV - Andante mosso - Poco più mosso - Poco più mosso (Allegro moderato) - Meno mosso (Andante non troppo) - Poco più mosso (Moderato) - Poco più mosso. Tranquillo. Un poco gravemente - Andante - Allegro moderato - Andante maestoso: 29:39
Prokofievs Symphony No.3 was composed in 1928, based on the music of the expressionistic opera The Fiery Angel. The composer worked intermittently on the project between 1919-27, and a production was announced for the 1927-8 season at the Berlin State Opera conducted by Bruno Walter, but this was dropped. In June 1928 an abbreviated version of Act Two was played in concert under Koussevitzky. Not wanting the music to languish in obscurity, Prokofiev initially devised extracting numbers like a standard symphonic suite, but his friend Nikolai Myaskovsky remarked that the music was properly fitted to be developed like in a symphony.
Once finished, the work was premiered on May 17 of 1929, performed by the Symphonic Orchestra of Paris conducted by Pierre Monteux, with Myaskovsky as the dedicatee. It had a moderate reception, but was better received in Moscow a few years later. The opera itself it was deemed too disjointed and episodic to be produced, and it wouldnt be staged until 1955, by then two years after the composers death. The symphony is one of Prokofiev’s most complex, raging, and avant-garde works. In its four movements, the composer unleashes an almost unrestrained energy, in which only the second movement emerges as a truly contrasting island of tranquillity. To quote the famous Russian pianist Sviatoslav Richter: I had never before felt anything similar when listening to music. It felt to me like an apocalypse.
The Fiery Angel is based on the 1908 symbolist novel of the same name by Valery Bryusov. Prokofiev stumbled across this novel during his nomadic years spent wandering between America, France and the Bavarian region of Pfaffenwinkel. After facing insurmountable difficulties in getting it produced, Prokofiev considered burning the score, as Gogol had done with the second volume of Dead Souls. The setting is Medieval Germany. A teenage girl, Renate, begins seeing visions of an angel clothed in fire. She enters a convent, persuades the other nuns there that her visions are real, and is burned at the stake for her heretical beliefs. Along the way we find black magic, hallucinations, hysterics, obsessive behaviour, exorcisms, knights-errant, and lurid goings-on in a nunnery.
The first movement is structured in sonata form, based on the leitmotivs of the operas main characters Renata and Ruprecht. It begins with apocalyptic and dissonant chords on full orchestra. A dramatic and passionate main theme is presented by strings and horns, which unfolds in a dark and expressive way. After a transition, a deeply melancholic second theme is introduced by bassoon and undulating strings, offering great contrast. The development is launched with rhythmic fragments of the main theme. As the material is developed, the music becomes increasingly strenuous, fierce and dissonant, culminating in an expressionistic climax that directly segways into the recapitulation of the themes. An even more intense climax is reached with the second theme, followed by a grotesque polytonal march. A substantial and ominous coda combines the themes before the moderato with the main theme dissolving in the silence.
The second movement is written in ternary form, based on music from the opera’s last act after the heroine has sought the peace of a convent. It begins with a serene and lyrical main theme, taking the form of a chorale presented by low strings, then blissfully taken by woodwinds as it unfolds in a series of variations. The central section is contrasting in nature, with a brooding and chromatic second theme on woodwinds, which is Fausts theme from Act IV. The main theme is then recapitulated in a varied way, with brief and unsettling reminiscences of the central section before the andante ends with a rather questioning coda.
[Musical analysis continued in the comments section].
Pictures: [Left] Lucifero (1901) by Italian artist Alberto Martini. [Right] The Fallen Angel by Dutch painter Willem de Zwart.
Musical analysis partially written by myself. Sources: https://tinyurl.com/2729usov and https://tinyurl.com/24t5n7jc
To check the score: https://tinyurl.com/2y6g8h6d Symphony No.3 in C minor - Sergei Prokofiev](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ezaBumIXTq0/mqdefault.jpg)




![Symphony No.4 in C minor - Sergei Taneyev
Philharmonia Orchestra conducted by Neeme Järvi.
I - Allegro molto (𝅗𝅥. = 54) - Animando - Tranquillo - Appassionato - Animando: 0:00
II - Adagio (𝅘𝅥 = 40) - Più mosso (𝅘𝅥 = 56) - Tempo I (𝅘𝅥 = 40) - Incalzando: 13:06
III - Scherzo. Vivace (𝅘𝅥 = 120) - Tempo I (𝅘𝅥 = 120) - Poco incalzando - Meno mosso: 25:55
IV - Finale. Allegro energico (𝅗𝅥 = 104) - Molto maestoso (𝅗𝅥 = 60) - Incalzando: 31:45
Taneyevs Symphony No.4 was composed between 1896-8, written during a productive period in which the composer was at the height of his creative powers. It was premiered in St. Petersburg on April 2 of 1898, conducted by the scores dedicatee Alexander Glazunov. The piece was received with great acclaim, and in the following years it was performed in Moscow and again in St. Petersburg, attracting great attention both among audiences and the musical intelligentsia. It was the only one of his four symphonies to be published in his lifetime, retaining its popularity in the years that followed and being recorded multiple times.
By the time he completed the symphony, Taneyev had earned the nickname of Russian Brahms, which he vehemently rejected, but, as this work suggests, the comparison was certainly not without foundation. The music of both composers, renowned masters of counterpoint who produced four symphonies each, bears striking similarities in its melodic and harmonic structures, form, and even origins. Since its premiere, Taneyevs fourth has ranked alongside the symphonies of Tchaikovsky, Scriabin, Balakirev, and Glazunov, among the late-romantic masterpieces of Russian music. Countess Sophya Tolstaya wrote in her diary: Sergey Ivanovich played for me his wonderful symphony and it affected me very much: it is a beautiful work, with noble, elevated style. Rimsky-Korsakov also wrote to Taneyev: I think that your symphony is the best contemporary work: it is noble in style, excellent in form and marvellous in the development of all its musical ideas.
The first movement is structured in sonata form. It begins with a three-note motive on full orchestra based on the tritone, Taneyev’s trademark interval in all his mature works. Like the opening Fate motif in Beethoven’s Fifth Symphony, Taneyev’s tritone figure reappears throughout the entire symphony, thus making it a cyclical work. This motive becomes the basis of a stormy and expressive main theme in C minor, shared between strings and woodwinds. It unfolds with a muscular and dire relentlessness. After an imperious climax is reached, a transition leads to the lyrical and cantabile second theme in A-flat major, vaguely resembling a waltz and presented by cellos, then taken by clarinets.
A dramatic transition then kickstarts a repeat of the exposition, an archaic element found more on classical and early romantic symphonies. The development section is dominated by the motive, kicking a dissonant and dramatic struggle, enhanced by an intricate contrapuntal transformation of the material. The music reaches a highly passionate climax with the second theme, linking with the recapitulation of both themes. The coda is substantial and contrapuntal in nature, almost like a second development that ends the allegro hammering down fatalistic C minor chords on full orchestra.
The second movement is structured in ternary form. It opens with a deeply lyrical and melancholic main theme in A-flat major, presented by strings and derived from the opening motive. The clarinet takes it a dreamy, cantabile way before the material unfolds in a yearning and expressive tone. The central section features a rhythmic and tortuous second theme in D minor, derived from the three-note motive as well. The music then quickly offers contrast with a dance-like idea in F major on woodwinds, which grows on strings into a vitalistic and expansive third theme. A solemn and expressive climax is reached as the main and third themes are contrapuntally combined. The main theme is then recapitulated in the home key of A-flat major, the adagio ending with a gentle and peaceful coda.
The third movement is a scherzo in ternary form. It begins with a cheerful and rhythmic main theme in F major, derived from the opening motive once again and introduced by woodwinds over string accompaniment. It unfolds in a vigorous and imperious manner, as common as it is in the tradition of Russian scherzi. The trio section offers a lyrical and voluptuous second theme on strings, offering contrast. The scherzo material is then recapitulated with even more energy and force, before the movement ends with a playful gesture.
[Musical analysis continued in the comments section]
Picture: To the War (1888) by Russian painter Konstantin Savitsky.
Musical analysis partially written by myself. Sources: https://tinyurl.com/2yuzv9n3, https://tinyurl.com/258onvyn, https://tinyurl.com/28j6scph and https://tinyurl.com/24cocjeu
To check the score: https://tinyurl.com/yov7sdrz Symphony No.4 in C minor - Sergei Taneyev](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/fzAxSnpUits/mqdefault.jpg)