Uploaded April 2026 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
FFRF attorneys Liz Cavell and Nancy Noet break down the Supreme Court’s Chiles v. Salazar decision, which reshapes the legal fight over conversion therapy bans for LGBTQ minors. They explain the court’s free speech reasoning and what what the ruling means for future state laws. The discussion also highlights the broader risks this ruling poses for regulating medical and mental health care.
Learn more about the Freedom From Religion Foundation at ffrf.org
--
Facebook facebook.com/4ffrf
Instagram instagram.com/ffrf_official
Bluesky https://bsky.app/profile/ffrf.org
X (Twitter) twitter.com/ffrf
TikTok tiktok.com/@ffrf_official
--
Report a state/church violation ffrf.us/report?r=lp
Join FFFRF or make a donation ffrf.org/get-involved/donate
FFRF attorneys Liz Cavell and Nancy Noet break down the Supreme Court’s Chiles v. Salazar decision, which reshapes the legal fight over conversion therapy bans for LGBTQ minors. They explain the court’s free speech reasoning and what what the ruling means for future state laws. The discussion also highlights the broader risks this ruling poses for regulating medical and mental health care.
Learn more about the Freedom From Religion Foundation at ffrf.org
--
Facebook facebook.com/4ffrf
Instagram instagram.com/ffrf_official
Bluesky https://bsky.app/profile/ffrf.org
X (Twitter) twitter.com/ffrf
TikTok tiktok.com/@ffrf_official
--
Report a state/church violation ffrf.us/report?r=lp
Join FFFRF or make a donation ffrf.org/get-involved/donate










