Uploaded February 2025 | Updated September 2026, 1 hour ago
Lecture at the Conference "Enlightenment in the World.
The French Revolution of 1789 is generally recognized as the embodiment of Enlightenment’s ideas of universalism, cosmopolitanism and human freedom. This talk will discuss the limits of such understanding, especially in the context of the impact of these ideas in the colonies. The first section discusses the reception of the news of the revolution in the French settlements in India and the total disappointment of the residents, who expected representation in the colonial assemblies as well as other universal rights which had been proclaimed. The second section examines the revolt of the slaves in Saint Domingue under the leadership of Toussaint L’Ouverture as well as the inner contradictions within revolutionary France on the one hand, and the universalist implications of the new constitution introduced by Toussaint on the other. The final section explores the later evolution of the French narrative of the revolution over the nineteenth and the twentieth centuries which nationalized the revolution. At the same time, in the words of a French diplomat in 1910, the Rights of Man “sound like the artificial ideas dear to the Evangelists of the French Revolution”’. Separate laws for the colonies were prescribed.
Lecture at the Conference "Enlightenment in the World.
The French Revolution of 1789 is generally recognized as the embodiment of Enlightenment’s ideas of universalism, cosmopolitanism and human freedom. This talk will discuss the limits of such understanding, especially in the context of the impact of these ideas in the colonies. The first section discusses the reception of the news of the revolution in the French settlements in India and the total disappointment of the residents, who expected representation in the colonial assemblies as well as other universal rights which had been proclaimed. The second section examines the revolt of the slaves in Saint Domingue under the leadership of Toussaint L’Ouverture as well as the inner contradictions within revolutionary France on the one hand, and the universalist implications of the new constitution introduced by Toussaint on the other. The final section explores the later evolution of the French narrative of the revolution over the nineteenth and the twentieth centuries which nationalized the revolution. At the same time, in the words of a French diplomat in 1910, the Rights of Man “sound like the artificial ideas dear to the Evangelists of the French Revolution”’. Separate laws for the colonies were prescribed.




![Daniel G. Williams: Paul Robeson and Wales: Towards a Particularist Universalism
In an interview of 1958, Paul Robeson suggested that the fusion of class and ethnic identities in his thought was a result of his experiences in Wales: “[T]oday I feel as much at home in the Welsh valley[s] as I would in my own Negro section in any city in the United States. I just did a broadcast by transatlantic cable to the Welsh valley[s], a few weeks ago, and here was the first understanding that the struggle of the Negro people, or of any people, cannot be by itself – that is, the human struggle…That defines my philosophy. It’s a joining one. We are a working people, a laboring people – the Negro people.” This passage is striking due to the apparent tension between the declaration of ethnic particularity – ‘the Negro people’ – and an internationalist, universalist commitment to ‘the human struggle’. My paper will consider Wales a space where the tensions between universalist internationalism and ethnic particularism in Robeson’s thought were played out, both during his life and posthumously. Daniel G. Williams: Paul Robeson and Wales: Towards a Particularist Universalism](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/pVPwpwBRC_k/mqdefault.jpg)





