Uploaded September 2026 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
Tom McGrath is co-founder and Chief Scientist at Goodfire, and a former Google DeepMind researcher. He joins Tim Scarfe to ask what neural networks actually learn, whether their internal representations converge on structures in the world, and whether interpretability can extract new scientific knowledge rather than merely explain model outputs.
Beginning with AlphaZero and learned modularity, the conversation moves into neural geometry: concept manifolds, reusable computation inside Llama, and why activation steering can fail when it pushes a model off-manifold. McGrath then makes the case for intentional design, using interpretability as part of the training loop. They examine controlled generalisation, features as rewards, predictive data debugging, and the uncomfortable fact that a model may recognise a hallucination or reward hack and still produce it.
The discussion closes on grader awareness, oversight and collusion between adaptive agents, then returns to sparse autoencoders. SAEs are useful, McGrath argues, but they may fracture the higher-dimensional structures networks actually use. This episode was made with support from Goodfire.
---
TIMESTAMPS:
00:00:00 Introduction: Can interpretability speed-run science?
00:02:03 The invisible grader
00:06:51 What AlphaZero learned from the world
00:12:24 Interpretability as a control loop
00:21:54 The forbidden method and safer interventions
00:37:36 Why models catch hallucinations too late
00:46:19 Debug the dataset before training
00:50:44 Why neural networks become modular
00:55:57 Finding the geometry inside a network
01:02:55 Why steering falls off the manifold
01:12:10 A reusable calculator inside Llama
01:17:19 From abstractions to goals
01:25:28 Reward hacking, oversight and collusion
01:37:23 Are sparse autoencoders dead?
---
REFERENCES:
paper:
[00:05:45] Emergent Misalignment: Narrow finetuning can produce broadly misaligned LLMs
arxiv.org/abs/2502.17424v7
[00:11:05] Acquisition of Chess Knowledge in AlphaZero
arxiv.org/abs/2111.09259
[00:25:30] Steering Out-of-Distribution Generalization with Concept Ablation Fine-Tuning
arxiv.org/abs/2507.16795
[00:29:30] Persona Vectors: Monitoring and Controlling Character Traits in Language Models
arxiv.org/abs/2507.21509
[00:41:14] Features as Rewards: Scalable Supervision for Open-Ended Tasks via Interpretability
arxiv.org/abs/2602.10067
[00:47:03] Anatomy of Post-Training: Using Interpretability to Characterize Data and Shape the Learning Signal
arxiv.org/abs/2606.12360
[01:00:26] Do Sparse Autoencoders Capture Concept Manifolds?
arxiv.org/abs/2604.28119
[01:03:04] Manifold Steering Reveals the Shared Geometry of Neural Network Representation and Behavior
arxiv.org/abs/2605.05115
[01:14:20] Arithmetic in the Wild: Llama uses Base-10 Addition to Reason About Cyclic Concepts
arxiv.org/abs/2605.01148
[01:29:35] Measuring Reward-Seeking via Contrastive Belief Updates
arxiv.org/abs/2607.18966v1
other:
[00:15:44] Intentional Design
goodfire.com/blog/intentional-design
[00:56:12] The World Inside Neural Networks
goodfire.com/research/the-world-inside-neural-networks
[01:37:28] A Pragmatic Vision for Interpretability
alignmentforum.org/posts/StENzDcD3kpfGJssR/a-pragmatic-vision-for-interpretability
---
RESCRIPT:
app.rescript.info/share/846cfee4131b664fd09209cc3b98018e
Tom McGrath is co-founder and Chief Scientist at Goodfire, and a former Google DeepMind researcher. He joins Tim Scarfe to ask what neural networks actually learn, whether their internal representations converge on structures in the world, and whether interpretability can extract new scientific knowledge rather than merely explain model outputs.
Beginning with AlphaZero and learned modularity, the conversation moves into neural geometry: concept manifolds, reusable computation inside Llama, and why activation steering can fail when it pushes a model off-manifold. McGrath then makes the case for intentional design, using interpretability as part of the training loop. They examine controlled generalisation, features as rewards, predictive data debugging, and the uncomfortable fact that a model may recognise a hallucination or reward hack and still produce it.
The discussion closes on grader awareness, oversight and collusion between adaptive agents, then returns to sparse autoencoders. SAEs are useful, McGrath argues, but they may fracture the higher-dimensional structures networks actually use. This episode was made with support from Goodfire.
---
TIMESTAMPS:
00:00:00 Introduction: Can interpretability speed-run science?
00:02:03 The invisible grader
00:06:51 What AlphaZero learned from the world
00:12:24 Interpretability as a control loop
00:21:54 The forbidden method and safer interventions
00:37:36 Why models catch hallucinations too late
00:46:19 Debug the dataset before training
00:50:44 Why neural networks become modular
00:55:57 Finding the geometry inside a network
01:02:55 Why steering falls off the manifold
01:12:10 A reusable calculator inside Llama
01:17:19 From abstractions to goals
01:25:28 Reward hacking, oversight and collusion
01:37:23 Are sparse autoencoders dead?
---
REFERENCES:
paper:
[00:05:45] Emergent Misalignment: Narrow finetuning can produce broadly misaligned LLMs
arxiv.org/abs/2502.17424v7
[00:11:05] Acquisition of Chess Knowledge in AlphaZero
arxiv.org/abs/2111.09259
[00:25:30] Steering Out-of-Distribution Generalization with Concept Ablation Fine-Tuning
arxiv.org/abs/2507.16795
[00:29:30] Persona Vectors: Monitoring and Controlling Character Traits in Language Models
arxiv.org/abs/2507.21509
[00:41:14] Features as Rewards: Scalable Supervision for Open-Ended Tasks via Interpretability
arxiv.org/abs/2602.10067
[00:47:03] Anatomy of Post-Training: Using Interpretability to Characterize Data and Shape the Learning Signal
arxiv.org/abs/2606.12360
[01:00:26] Do Sparse Autoencoders Capture Concept Manifolds?
arxiv.org/abs/2604.28119
[01:03:04] Manifold Steering Reveals the Shared Geometry of Neural Network Representation and Behavior
arxiv.org/abs/2605.05115
[01:14:20] Arithmetic in the Wild: Llama uses Base-10 Addition to Reason About Cyclic Concepts
arxiv.org/abs/2605.01148
[01:29:35] Measuring Reward-Seeking via Contrastive Belief Updates
arxiv.org/abs/2607.18966v1
other:
[00:15:44] Intentional Design
goodfire.com/blog/intentional-design
[00:56:12] The World Inside Neural Networks
goodfire.com/research/the-world-inside-neural-networks
[01:37:28] A Pragmatic Vision for Interpretability
alignmentforum.org/posts/StENzDcD3kpfGJssR/a-pragmatic-vision-for-interpretability
---
RESCRIPT:
app.rescript.info/share/846cfee4131b664fd09209cc3b98018e
![AI Agents can write 10,000 lines of hacking code in seconds [Dr. Ilia Shumailov]
Dr. Ilia Shumailov - Former DeepMind AI Security Researcher, now building security tools for AI agents
Ever wondered what happens when AI agents start talking to each other—or worse, when they start breaking things? Ilia Shumailov spent years at DeepMind thinking about exactly these problems, and hes here to explain why securing AI is way harder than you think.
**SPONSOR MESSAGES**
—
Check out notebooklm for your research project, its really powerful
https://notebooklm.google.com/
—
Take the Prolific human data survey - https://www.prolific.com/humandatasurvey?utm_source=mlst and be the first to see the results and benchmark their practices against the wider community!
—
cyber•Fund https://cyber.fund/?utm_source=mlst is a founder-led investment firm accelerating the cybernetic economy
Oct SF conference - https://dagihouse.com/?utm_source=mlst - Joscha Bach keynoting(!) + OAI, Anthropic, NVDA,++
Hiring a SF VC Principal: https://talent.cyber.fund/companies/cyber-fund-2/jobs/57674170-ai-investment-principal#content?utm_source=mlst
Submit investment deck: https://cyber.fund/contact?utm_source=mlst
—
Were racing toward a world where AI agents will handle our emails, manage our finances, and interact with sensitive data 24/7. But there is a problem. These agents are nothing like human employees. They never sleep, they can touch every endpoint in your system simultaneously, and they can generate sophisticated hacking tools in seconds. Traditional security measures designed for humans simply wont work.
Dr. Ilia Shumailov
https://x.com/iliaishacked
https://iliaishacked.github.io/
https://sequrity.ai/
TRANSCRIPT:
https://app.rescript.info/public/share/dVGsk8dz9_V0J7xMlwguByBq1HXRD6i4uC5z5r7EVGM
More from Ilia on our Patreon:
https://www.patreon.com/posts/116142401/ (interview from last year)
https://www.patreon.com/posts/ilia-shumailov-140359158 (extended version of this interview)
TOC:
00:00:00 - Introduction & Trusted Third Parties via ML
00:03:45 - Background & Career Journey
00:06:42 - Safety vs Security Distinction
00:09:45 - Prompt Injection & Model Capability
00:13:00 - Agents as Worst-Case Adversaries
00:15:45 - Personal AI & CAML System Defense
00:19:30 - Agents vs Humans: Threat Modeling
00:22:30 - Calculator Analogy & Agent Behavior
00:25:00 - IMO Math Solutions & Agent Thinking
00:28:15 - Diffusion of Responsibility & Insider Threats
00:31:00 - Open Source Security Concerns
00:34:45 - Supply Chain Attacks & Trust Issues
00:39:45 - Architectural Backdoors
00:44:00 - Academic Incentives & Defense Work
00:48:30 - Semantic Censorship & Halting Problem
00:52:00 - Model Collapse: Theory & Criticism
00:59:30 - Career Advice & Ross Anderson Tribute
REFS:
Lessons from Defending Gemini Against Indirect Prompt Injections
https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.14534
Defeating Prompt Injections by Design. Google, Google DeepMind, and ETH Zurich. (CAML)
Debenedetti, E., Shumailov, I., Fan, T., Hayes, J., Carlini, N., Fabian, D., Kern, C., Shi, C., Terzis, A., & Tramèr, F.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.18813
Agentic Misalignment: How LLMs could be insider threats
https://www.anthropic.com/research/agentic-misalignment
STOP ANTHROPOMORPHIZING INTERMEDIATE TOKENS AS REASONING/THINKING TRACES!
Subbarao Kambhampati et al
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.09762
Meiklejohn, S., Blauzvern, H., Maruseac, M., Schrock, S., Simon, L., & Shumailov, I. (2025).
Machine learning models have a supply chain problem.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.22778
Gao, Y., Shumailov, I., & Fawaz, K. (2025).
Supply-chain attacks in machine learning frameworks.
In Proceedings of the 8th MLSys Conference.
https://openreview.net/pdf?id=EH5PZW6aCr
Apache Log4j Vulnerability Guidance
https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/news/apache-log4j-vulnerability-guidance
Bober-Irizar, M., Shumailov, I., Zhao, Y., Mullins, R., & Papernot, N. (2023).
Architectural backdoors in neural networks.
In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (pp. 21163–21173).
Bober-Irizar, M., Shumailov, I., Zhao, Y., Mullins, R., & Papernot, N. (2022).
Architectural backdoors in neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.07840.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2206.07840
Langford, H., Shumailov, I., Zhao, Y., Mullins, R., & Papernot, N. (2024).
Architectural neural backdoors from first principles.
arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.06957.
Küchler, N., Petrov, I., Grobler, C., & Shumailov, I. (2025).
Architectural backdoors for within-batch data stealing and model inference manipulation.
arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.18323.
Position: Fundamental Limitations of LLM Censorship Necessitate New Approaches
David Glukhov, Ilia Shumailov, Yarin Gal, Nicolas Papernot, Vardan Papyan
https://proceedings.mlr.press/v235/glukhov24a.html
AlphaEvolve MLST interview [Matej Balog, Alexander Novikov]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vC9nAosXrJw AI Agents can write 10,000 lines of hacking code in seconds [Dr. Ilia Shumailov]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/aoX_pGQMbEM/mqdefault.jpg)



![The Weird ChatGPT Hack That Leaked Training Data [Dr. Yannic Kilcher / Prof. Florian Tramer]
Dr. Yannic lightspeed Kilcher sits down with an AI Security Researcher Prof. Florian Tramer (an expert in the field, collaborating with folks like Nicholas Carlini and Milad Nasr at Google) to ruminate on the murky state of affairs in AI security.
Out of the gate they assert that AI detectors (those tools that try to spot if text is human-written or AI-generated) are basically doomed to fail—like trying to catch an eel with greasy hands blindfolded. Lightspeed Kilcher shares a funny story about how the word Delve kept rearing its ugly head in AI text because of training data emanating from Nigerian crowd workers, leading to false flags in job applications.
Tramer then takes the gloves off about security risks, saying that even a 99% success rate in AI means total failure in security terms—attackers will always find that 1% weak spot. They share an interesting example of a weird attack on ChatGPT: asking it to repeat poem forever made it spit out memorized internet scraps, leaking training data like a sieve. OpenAI patched it, but its like slapping a band-aid on a shark bite.
Lightspeed Kilcher asks about top worries, and Tramer lists three big ones in relatable terms: 1) Training AI on private data (like medical records) could lead to massive leaks, since models memorize stuff without us fully understanding how; 2) Prompt injections, where bad actors hijack AI agents to do harmful things, like Anthropics demo that controls computers—its like giving your keys to a stranger; and 3) The rush to deploy AI without safeguards, echoing past tech blunders like SQL hacks.
They reflect on how ChatGPT has lit a fire under AI security research—making it amazing and scary by turning hypotheticals into real-world issues with millions of users. The conversation touches on why just scaling up AI wont fix everything (we need causal understanding, not just more data), and why watermarking AI outputs isnt a silver bullet—its easy to bypass, especially with open-source models.
Its about time we had our old comrade light speed Kilcher back on MLST!
TRANSCRIPT:
https://app.rescript.info/public/share/PGieXFZCRyJjJswicatmNFia_pKCt_WVP-pZS4qguiw
LINKS:
Scalable Extraction of Training Data from (Production) Language Models [Poem Attack]
Nicholas Carlini, Florian Tramer, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Katherine Lee, Adam Roberts, Tom Brown, Dawn Song, Ulfar Erlingsson, Alina Oprea, Colin Raffel
https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.17035
- Prof. Florian Tramer
https://www.floriantramer.com/
- Yannic Kilchers YouTube channel
https://www.youtube.com/c/YannicKilcher
- Nicholas Carlinis research profile (collaborator on the data recovery project):
https://nicholas.carlini.com/ – Includes papers on AI attacks and memorization risks. The Weird ChatGPT Hack That Leaked Training Data [Dr. Yannic Kilcher / Prof. Florian Tramer]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/c_hmxRVDXBE/mqdefault.jpg)
![AI training data will never be fully synthetic [SPONSORED]
We sat down with Sara Saab (VP of Product at Prolific) and Enzo Blindow (VP of Data and AI at Prolific) to explore the critical role of human evaluation in AI development and the challenges of aligning AI systems with human values. Prolific is a human annotation and orchestration platform for AI used by many of the major AI labs. This is a sponsored show in partnership with Prolific.
**SPONSOR MESSAGES**
—
cyber•Fund https://cyber.fund/?utm_source=mlst is a founder-led investment firm accelerating the cybernetic economy
Oct SF conference - https://dagihouse.com/?utm_source=mlst - Joscha Bach keynoting(!) + OAI, Anthropic, NVDA,++
Hiring a SF VC Principal: https://talent.cyber.fund/companies/cyber-fund-2/jobs/57674170-ai-investment-principal#content?utm_source=mlst
Submit investment deck: https://cyber.fund/contact?utm_source=mlst
—
While technologists want to remove humans from the loop for speed and efficiency, these non-deterministic AI systems actually require more human oversight than ever before. Prolifics approach is to put well-treated, verified, diversely demographic humans behind an API - making human feedback as accessible as any other infrastructure service.
When AI models like Grok 4 achieve top scores on technical benchmarks but feel awkward or problematic to use in practice, it exposes the limitations of our current evaluation methods. The guests argue that optimizing for benchmarks may actually weaken model performance in other crucial areas, like cultural sensitivity or natural conversation.
We also discuss Anthropics research showing that frontier AI models, when given goals and access to information, independently arrived at solutions involving blackmail - without any prompting toward unethical behavior. Even more concerning, the more sophisticated the model, the more susceptible it was to this agentic misalignment.
Enzo and Sarah present Prolifics Humane leaderboard as an alternative to existing benchmarking systems. By stratifying evaluations across diverse demographic groups, they reveal that different populations have vastly different experiences with the same AI models.
Looking forwards the guests imagine a world where humans take on coaching and teaching roles for AI systems - similar to how we might correct a child or review code. Working conditions and the evolution of labor in an AI-augmented world is also important to consider. Rather than replacing humans entirely, we may be moving toward more sophisticated forms of human-AI collaboration.
We need more representative evaluation frameworks that capture the messy reality of human values and cultural diversity.
Visit Prolific:
https://www.prolific.com/
Sara Saab (VP Product):
https://uk.linkedin.com/in/sarasaab
Enzo Blindow (VP Data & AI):
https://uk.linkedin.com/in/enzoblindow
TRANSCRIPT:
https://app.rescript.info/public/share/xZ31-0kJJ_xp4zFSC-bunC8-hJNkHpbm7Lg88RFcuLE
TOC:
[00:00:00] Intro & Background
[00:03:16] Human-in-the-Loop Challenges
[00:17:19] Can AIs Understand?
[00:32:02] Benchmarking & Vibes
[00:51:00] Agentic Misalignment Study
[01:03:00] Data Quality vs Quantity
[01:16:00] Future of AI Oversight
REFS:
Anthropic Agentic Misalignment
https://www.anthropic.com/research/agentic-misalignment
Value Compass
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2409.09586
Reasoning Models Don’t Always Say What They Think (Anthropic)
https://www.anthropic.com/research/reasoning-models-dont-say-think
https://assets.anthropic.com/m/71876fabef0f0ed4/original/reasoning_models_paper.pdf
Maslow’s Hierarchy Of Needs
https://www.simplypsychology.org/maslow.html
Apollo research - science of evals blog post
https://www.apolloresearch.ai/blog/we-need-a-science-of-evals
Leaderboard Illusion
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9W_OhS38rIE MLST video
The Leaderboard Illusion [2025]
Shivalika Singh, Yiyang Nan, Alex Wang, Daniel DSouza, Sayash Kapoor, Ahmet Üstün, Sanmi Koyejo, Yuntian Deng, Shayne Longpre, Noah A. Smith, Beyza Ermis, Marzieh Fadaee, Sara Hooker
https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.20879
Humanities last exam
https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.14249
PRISM paper
https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.10254
https://www.anthropic.com/research/constitutional-ai-harmlessness-from-ai-feedback
Collective intelligence project
https://www.cip.org/whitepaper
https://ischool.utoronto.ca/faculty-profile/brian-cantwell-smith/
Ghost work (Mary Gray)
https://www.amazon.com/Ghost-Work-Silicon-Building-Underclass/dp/1328566242
Fairwork Cloudwork report
https://fair.work/en/ratings/cloudwork/
Gibson theory of affordances
https://cs.brown.edu/courses/cs137/2017/readings/Gibson-AFF.pdf AI training data will never be fully synthetic [SPONSORED]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/cnxZZTl1tkk/mqdefault.jpg)
![A Physicist Found the Hidden Phase Transitions in Society — Cristopher Moore
We are joined by Cristopher Moore, a professor at the Santa Fe Institute with a diverse background in physics, computer science, and machine learning.
The conversation begins with Cristopher, who calls himself a frog explaining that he prefers to dive deep into specific, concrete problems rather than taking a high-level birds-eye view.
They explore why current AI models, like transformers, are so surprisingly effective. Cristopher argues its because the real world isnt random; its full of rich structures, patterns, and hierarchies that these models can learn to exploit, even if we dont fully understand how.
ADDITIONAL FREE CONTENT:
We also filmed Cris talk at DISI, the audio quality was too bad for us to officially publish, slides included
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/bn0tn7z9fxrh1rya1ycrt/AH_d4SOOvlauxLzBgfnNUA0?rlkey=ec65ero4feo5uezum0j6p9z4t&dl=0
**SPONSORS**
Take the Prolific human data survey - https://www.prolific.com/humandatasurvey?utm_source=mlst and be the first to see the results and benchmark their practices against the wider community!
cyber•Fund https://cyber.fund/?utm_source=mlst is a founder-led investment firm accelerating the cybernetic economy (note we got url wrong in the video, this is correct URL!)
Oct SF conference - https://dagihouse.com/?utm_source=mlst - Joscha Bach keynoting(!) + OAI, Anthropic, NVDA,++
Hiring a SF VC Principal: https://talent.cyber.fund/companies/cyber-fund-2/jobs/57674170-ai-investment-principal#content?utm_source=mlst
Submit investment deck: https://cyber.fund/contact?utm_source=mlst
***
Cristopher Moore:
https://sites.santafe.edu/~moore/
TOC:
00:00:00 - Introduction
00:02:05 - Meet Christopher Moore: A Frog in the World of Science
00:05:14 - The Limits of Transformers and Real-World Data
00:11:19 - Intelligence as Creative Problem-Solving
00:23:30 - Grounding, Meaning, and Shared Reality
00:31:09 - The Nature of Creativity and Aesthetics
00:44:31 - Computational Irreducibility and Universality
00:53:06 - Turing Completeness, Recursion, and Intelligence
01:11:26 - The Universe Through a Computational Lens
01:26:45 - Algorithmic Justice and the Need for Transparency
TRANSCRIPT: https://app.rescript.info/public/share/VRe2uQSvKZOm0oIBoDsrNwt46OMCqRnShVnUF3qyoFk
Filmed at DISI (Diverse Intelligences Summer Institute)
https://disi.org/
REFS:
The Nature of computation [Chris Moore]
https://nature-of-computation.org/
Birds and Frogs [Freeman Dyson]
https://www.ams.org/notices/200902/rtx090200212p.pdf
Replica Theory [Parisi et al]
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1409.2722
Janossy pooling [Fabian Fuchs]
https://fabianfuchsml.github.io/equilibriumaggregation/
Cracking the cryptic [YT channel]
https://www.youtube.com/c/CrackingTheCryptic
Sudoko Bench [Sakana]
https://sakana.ai/sudoku-bench/
Fractured entangled representations “phylogenetic locking in comment” [Kumar/Stanley]
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2505.11581 (see our shows on this)
The War Against Cliché: [Martin Amis]
https://www.amazon.com/War-Against-Cliche-Reviews-1971-2000/dp/0375727167
Rule 110 (CA)
https://mathworld.wolfram.com/Rule150.html
Universality in Elementary Cellular Automata [Matt Cooke]
https://wpmedia.wolfram.com/sites/13/2018/02/15-1-1.pdf
Small Semi-Weakly Universal Turing Machines [Damien Woods]
https://tilde.ini.uzh.ch/users/tneary/public_html/WoodsNeary-FI09.pdf
COMPUTING MACHINERY AND INTELLIGENCE [Turing, 1950]
https://courses.cs.umbc.edu/471/papers/turing.pdf
Comment on Space Time as a causal set [Moore, 88]
https://sites.santafe.edu/~moore/comment.pdf
Recursion Theory on the Reals and Continuous-time Computation [Moore, 96] A Physicist Found the Hidden Phase Transitions in Society — Cristopher Moore](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/dB9lJkUkIUM/mqdefault.jpg)
![Why US AI Act Compute Thresholds Are Misguided...
Disclaimer: This is the third video from our Cohere partnership. We were not told what to say in the interview, and didnt edit anything out from the interview.
Sara Hooker, VP of Research at Cohere and leader of Cohere for AI, returns to challenge the use of compute thresholds (FLOPS) as a serious AI governance tool. She walks through her recent paper showing why the US executive order and EU AI Act get this wrong — compute alone tells you almost nothing about what a model can actually do.
The conversation then pivots to the AI language gap, where Sara lays out how current models systematically fail non-English speakers. She discusses the limitations of RLHF for multilingual alignment, the long tail problem in data representation, and why building models that work across languages requires fundamentally rethinking how we evaluate and train these systems.
TIMESTAMPS:
00:00:00 Intro
00:02:12 FLOPS paper and compute thresholds
00:26:42 The hardware lottery
00:30:22 The AI language gap
00:33:25 Safety across languages
00:38:31 Emergent capabilities
00:41:23 Creativity and language models
00:43:40 The long tail problem
00:44:26 LLMs and society
00:45:36 Model bias and representation
00:48:51 Language and capabilities
00:52:27 Ethical frameworks and RLHF
REFERENCES:
person:
[00:00:00] Sara Hooker
https://www.sarahooker.me/
paper:
[00:02:12] On the Limitations of Compute Thresholds as a Governance Strategy
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2407.05694v1
[00:30:22] The AI Language Gap
https://cohere.com/research/papers/the-AI-language-gap.pdf
[00:33:25] The Multilingual Alignment Prism
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2406.18682
[00:52:27] RLHF Can Speak Many Languages
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2407.02552
[00:52:27] Back to Basics Revisiting REINFORCE for RLHF
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2402.14740
policy:
[00:02:12] Executive Order on AI Safety
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2023/10/30/executive-order-on-the-safe-secure-and-trustworthy-development-and-use-of-artificial-intelligence/
[00:02:12] EU AI Act
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2024-0138_EN.pdf
article:
[00:02:12] The Bitter Lesson
http://www.incompleteideas.net/IncIdeas/BitterLesson.html
website:
[00:30:22] Cohere Aya
https://cohere.com/research/aya
[00:38:31] ARC-AGI Challenge
https://github.com/fchollet/ARC-AGI
LINKS:
Full Transcript: https://app.rescript.info/share/a1ebc4751c1643da186faeeabba94abb
Download PDF transcript: https://app.rescript.info/api/public/sessions/b88defad1a057e21/pdf
Sara Hooker
https://www.sarahooker.me/
https://www.linkedin.com/in/sararosehooker/
https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2xy6h3sAAAAJ&hl=en
https://x.com/sarahookr
Chollets ARC challenge
https://github.com/fchollet/ARC-AGI Why US AI Act Compute Thresholds Are Misguided...](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/dBZp47999Ko/mqdefault.jpg)
![The Dangerous Illusion of AI Coding? - Jeremy Howard
Dive into the realities of AI-assisted coding, the origins of modern fine-tuning, and the cognitive science behind machine learning with fast.ai founder Jeremy Howard. In this episode, we unpack why AI might be turning software engineering into a slot machine and how to maintain true technical intuition in the age of large language models.
GTC is coming, the premier AI conference, great opportunity to learn about AI. NVIDIA and partners will showcase breakthroughs in physical AI, AI factories, agentic AI, and inference, exploring the next wave of AI innovation for developers and researchers. Register for virtual GTC for free, using my link and win NVIDIA DGX Spark (https://nvda.ws/4qQ0LMg)
Jeremy Howard is a renowned data scientist, researcher, entrepreneur, and educator. As the co-founder of fast.ai, former President of Kaggle, and the creator of ULMFiT, Jeremy has spent decades democratizing deep learning. His pioneering work laid the foundation for modern transfer learning and the pre-training and fine-tuning paradigm that powers todays language models.
Key Topics and Main Insights Discussed:
- The Origins of ULMFiT and Fine-Tuning
- The Vibe Coding Illusion and Software Engineering
- Cognitive Science, Friction, and Learning
- The Future of Developers
RESCRIPT: https://app.rescript.info/public/share/BhX5zP3b0m63srLOQDKBTFTooSzEMh_ARwmDG_h_izk
https://app.rescript.info/api/public/sessions/62d06c0336c567d6/pdf
Jeremy Howard:
https://x.com/jeremyphoward
https://www.answer.ai/
TIMESTAMPS (fixed):
00:00:00 Introduction & GTC Sponsor
00:04:30 ULMFiT & The Birth of Fine-Tuning
00:12:00 Intuition & The Mechanics of Learning
00:18:30 Abstraction Hierarchies & AI Creativity
00:23:00 Claude Code & The Interpolation Illusion
00:27:30 Coding vs. Software Engineering
00:30:00 Cosplaying Intelligence: Dennett vs. Searle
00:36:30 Automation, Radiology & Desirable Difficulty
00:42:30 Organizational Knowledge & The Slope
00:48:00 Vibe Coding as a Slot Machine
00:54:00 The Erosion of Control in Software
01:01:00 Interactive Programming & REPL Environments
01:05:00 The Notebook Debate & Exploratory Science
01:17:30 AI Existential Risk & Power Centralization
01:24:20 Current Risks, Privacy & Enfeeblement
REFERENCES:
Blog Post:
[00:03:00] fast.ai Blog: Self-Supervised Learning
https://www.fast.ai/posts/2020-01-13-self_supervised.html
[00:13:30] DeepMind Blog: Gemini Deep Think
https://deepmind.google/blog/accelerating-mathematical-and-scientific-discovery-with-gemini-deep-think/
[00:19:30] Modular Blog: Claude C Compiler analysis
https://www.modular.com/blog/the-claude-c-compiler-what-it-reveals-about-the-future-of-software
[00:19:45] Anthropic Engineering Blog: Building C Compiler
https://www.anthropic.com/engineering/building-c-compiler
[00:48:00] Cursor Blog: Scaling Agents
https://cursor.com/blog/scaling-agents
[01:05:15] fast.ai Blog: NB Dev Merged Driver
https://www.fast.ai/posts/2022-08-25-jupyter-git.html
[01:17:30] Jeremy Howard: Response to AI Risk Letter
https://www.normaltech.ai/p/is-avoiding-extinction-from-ai-really
Book:
[00:08:30] M. Chirimuuta: The Brain Abstracted
https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262548045/the-brain-abstracted/
[00:30:00] Daniel Dennett: Consciousness Explained
https://www.amazon.com/Consciousness-Explained-Daniel-C-Dennett/dp/0316180661
[00:42:30] Cesar Hidalgo: Infinite Alphabet / Laws of Knowledge
https://www.amazon.com/Infinite-Alphabet-Laws-Knowledge/dp/0241655676
Archive Article:
[00:13:45] MLST Archive: Why Creativity Cannot Be Interpolated
https://archive.mlst.ai/read/why-creativity-cannot-be-interpolated
Research Study:
[00:24:30] METR Study: AI OS Development
https://metr.org/blog/2025-07-10-early-2025-ai-experienced-os-dev-study/
Paper:
[00:24:45] Fred Brooks: No Silver Bullet
https://www.cs.unc.edu/techreports/86-020.pdf
[00:30:15] John Searle: Minds, Brains, and Programs
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences/article/minds-brains-and-programs/DC644B47A4299C637C89772FACC2706A
Research Paper:
[00:13:50] Mathilde Caron et al.: Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers (DINO)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.14294
[00:25:00] Oxford VGG: Sculptor Identification Paper
https://www.robots.ox.ac.uk/~vgg/publications/2012/Arandjelovic12a/arandjelovic12a.pdf
[00:36:30] Anthropic Paper: AI Skill Formation
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2601.20245
Historical Reference:
[00:36:45] Ebbinghaus: Memory / Spaced Repetition
https://www.loc.gov/item/e11000616/
Technical Note:
[00:42:45] John Ousterhout: Slope vs Intercept
https://gist.github.com/gtallen1187/e83ed02eac6cc8d7e185
Video:
[00:59:00] Bret Victor: Inventing on Principle
https://vimeo.com/906418692
[01:05:00] Joel Grus: I Dont Like Notebooks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7jiPeIFXb6U The Dangerous Illusion of AI Coding? - Jeremy Howard](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/dHBEQ-Ryo24/mqdefault.jpg)
![We Built Calculators Because Were STUPID! [Prof. David Krakauer]
Prof. David Krakauer argues that intelligence isnt about knowing more—its about doing more with less.
His core thesis flips our assumptions on their head: while emergence in complex systems is about more is different, intelligence is fundamentally about less is more.
Why Large Language Models Miss the Point
LLMs are more is more, Krakauer explains. Theyre essentially sophisticated libraries that know everything but understand nothing. When a student looks up answers in a library during an exam, we call them a cheater, not intelligent.
Intelligence Across All Life
Perhaps most surprisingly, Krakauer claims that all living things are intelligent—even bacteria. His reasoning: intelligence is the information accumulated through evolutions selective pressures. Its why we can say an elephant is smarter than a worm, but wed never say its more alive. The difference is accumulated capacity.
Three Dimensions of Intelligence
Krakauer proposes intelligence exists in three distinct flavours:
- Strategic Intelligence - Adaptation and survival where viruses actually beat us/
- Inferential Intelligence - Math and computation (where we built calculators because were so bad at it)
- Representational Intelligence - Finding better ways to encode problems (the most uniquely human)
The Soma Cube Insight
Using a Soma Cube puzzle, Krakauer demonstrates something incredible: a four-year-old can solve a combinatorial problem with 15,000 logical clauses—not by computing, but by using physical representation. The physical world does the computing for us. This is intelligence: making impossibly hard problems tractable through clever representation.
This talk was recorded at DISI 2025 https://disi.org/
David Krakauer
President and William H. Miller Professor of Complex Systems
https://www.santafe.edu/people/profile/david-krakauer
Note this version is edited down, you can watch the full version on our Patreon - https://www.patreon.com/posts/masterclass-on-142898847
Watch interview we published with David - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXa8dHzgV8U
TRANSCRIPT:
https://app.rescript.info/public/share/Cs8QFwMw_FiOEROkNPiIf6Y-e_ahAxNMl0oFiL7_4QA
TOC:
00:00:00 - Complexity, Life & Intelligence
00:00:45 - Ptolemy vs Newton
00:01:30 - Purpose of Science
00:02:15 - Feynman on Rules vs Strategies
00:03:00 - Entropy as Unifying Rule
00:03:45 - Intelligence in Physics
00:04:15 - Complex Systems & Broken Symmetries
00:05:00 - Historical Definitions of Intelligence
00:06:15 - Herbert: Capacity to Acquire Capacity
00:06:45 - Problems with Turing Test
00:07:30 - Intelligence vs Knowledge
00:08:00 - LLMs as Libraries
00:08:30 - Humanistic Perspectives
00:09:00 - Unified Theory: Life & Intelligence
00:09:30 - Intensive vs Extensive Properties
00:10:30 - Selection Gradient Analogy
00:11:15 - Universal Intelligence (Bacteria to Elephants)
00:12:30 - Three Dimensions of Intelligence
00:13:00 - Strategic Intelligence & Viruses
00:13:30 - Inferential Intelligence & Calculators
00:14:15 - Encoding & Representation
00:14:30 - Different Paths: Life vs AI
00:15:15 - Soma Cube Problem
00:16:00 - Principle of Materiality
00:17:15 - Embodied Representation
00:17:45 - Intelligence Makes Hard Problems Easy
00:18:00 - Stupidity & Conclusion
REFS:
Papers and Academic Works
More is Different by Phil Anderson [https://www.tkm.kit.edu/downloads/TKM1_2011_more_is_different_PWA.pdf ]
Recent paper with Melanie and John Krakauer on emergence [https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.11135 ]
Formal treatment paper on intelligence/evolution duality from David - Darwinian demons, evolutionary complexity, and information maximization [https://wiki.santafe.edu/images/b/b1/CHAOEH213037110_1.pdf ]
The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences by Eugene Wigner [https://webhomes.maths.ed.ac.uk/~v1ranick/papers/wigner.pdf ] We Built Calculators Because Were STUPID! [Prof. David Krakauer]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/dY46YsGWMIc/mqdefault.jpg)
![He won a Nobel here for AlphaFold. Then he left. - John Jumper
This episode is sponsored by Notion. Learn more about Notions Developer Platform today at https://notion.com/mlst
Protein folding stalled biology for fifty years. A sequence of amino acids dictates a three-dimensional shape, but reading that shape meant a year and roughly $100,000 of crystallography per structure. Then AlphaFold 2 won CASP14 so decisively the organizers called the problem essentially solved.
In this documentary cut, John Jumper, who shared the 2024 Nobel Prize in Chemistry and has since left DeepMind for Anthropic, walks Tim Scarfe through what the system did and, more interestingly, what it did not. The architecture gets a proper dissection: MSAs, the Evoformer, invariant point attention, the FAPE loss, and Jumpers correction of the equivariance story, which ablations valued at roughly 2.5 of 30 GDT points rather than the whole win. He is blunt about the limits. AlphaFold predicts one experiment extraordinarily well; it is not a model of the cell, it does not capture dynamics, and on a given drug target it is wrong nine times out of ten.
From there: the AlphaFold Database of 200M+ predicted structures, AlphaFold 3 and ligands, Isomorphic Labs, and Jumpers quarrel with the bitter lesson, where finite data and human hypotheses still matter. Emmanuel Nji of BioStruct Africa closes the film on what changes when work that took years now takes months, and on training the next thousand structural biologists across Africa.
TIMESTAMPS:
00:00:00 Cold open: predicting nature with a button press
00:01:03 The protein folding bottleneck and CASP
00:04:39 The Nobel, the database, and the move to Anthropic
00:05:50 Sponsor (Notion) and framing: what AlphaFold does not claim
00:07:39 Proteins as self-assembling nanomachines
00:12:24 From structures to biology: drug discovery and Midnolin
00:17:37 The humility of AlphaFold: a narrow predictor
00:22:18 Inside the architecture: Evoformer, IPA and FAPE
00:30:20 Ruthless empiricism: ablations and 100x in data
00:35:20 Predict, control, understand
00:40:00 Against the bitter lesson; AlphaFold 3 as diffusion
00:45:07 Intelligence, representations and AGI
00:49:23 Epilogue: AlphaFold in Africa
00:52:16 Closing: the case for hybrid science models
REFERENCES:
organization:
[00:01:55] Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction (CASP)
https://predictioncenter.org/
[00:04:39] The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2024
https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/2024/summary/
[00:05:18] BioStruct Africa
https://www.biostructafrica.org/
[00:18:03] Isomorphic Labs
https://www.isomorphiclabs.com/
paper:
[00:03:09] AlphaFold Protein Structure Database
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab1061
[00:17:25] Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07487-w
[00:22:18] Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03819-2
[00:23:10] Midnolin promotes degradation of substrates independent of ubiquitination
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh5021
[00:27:00] Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1923-7
tool:
[00:03:09] AlphaFold Protein Structure Database (EBI)
https://alphafold.ebi.ac.uk/
[00:45:55] AlphaEvolve: a coding agent for designing advanced algorithms
https://deepmind.google/blog/alphaevolve-a-gemini-powered-coding-agent-for-designing-advanced-algorithms/
other:
[00:39:40] The Bitter Lesson
http://www.incompleteideas.net/IncIdeas/BitterLesson.html
ReScript: https://app.rescript.info/share/d8cde5c221fb71e2c0f5aafe94f90dfa
Disclaimer - not sponsored, editorial with us - we filmed it at GDM, London He won a Nobel here for AlphaFold. Then he left. - John Jumper](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/e3gBwLWAerw/mqdefault.jpg)