Flat WaterFE | Stars Are Not Suns @FlatWaterFE | Uploaded November 2019 | Updated October 2024, 1 hour ago.
*STARS ARE NOT FAR-OFF SUNS!*
*FE Topics covered in this video:*
(1.) Stars Are Not Suns
(2.) Satellites - What are they? What do we see up there?
(3.) Telescopes - Pros and Cons
*(1) STARS AREN’T FAR-AWAY SUNS:*
The new videos that we have of stars prove that they’re not far off “Suns”… this destroys the heliocentric model in one fell swoop.
*(2) SATELLITES* 🛰 📡
Question: If there are no satellites, then what is it that we see up there?
Answer: High altitude balloons, long-life unmanned reconnaissance airplanes, dirigibles, uav's, drones, experimental comms platforms... yes, we can see lots of stuff up there flying around, but that doesn't mean they're satellites.
By the way, the blimps, dirigibles and tethered balloons at high-altitude are what you’re aiming your so-called “satellite dish” at. The thing that you call a “satellite dish” was, in truth, originally called a “directional antenna”. They changed the common parlance, the common terminology.
*(3) TELESCOPES*
The Telescopes shown here are Newtonian... “Dobsonian light-collector” telescopes are even worse. There are a few types of telescopes, but they all have similar problems. They reassemble an image after the light has been mixed, crossed over itself and reflected several times, which is why they don't properly represent what's in the sky. Alternatively, CCD detectors in high quality digital cameras (like a nikonp900) just record the light that strikes them... there's no crossover or mixing, so they give a more accurate representation of what stars actually look like. When we look through a high-quality zoom CCD lens we can see that stars are not “far-off suns” but are nearby electric, plasmic (plasma) or piezoelectric "beings" ... to me they appear to be what scripture says they are... Angels.
Thank you!
Please remember to leave a comment!
God bless you,
Glen.
*STARS ARE NOT FAR-OFF SUNS!*
*FE Topics covered in this video:*
(1.) Stars Are Not Suns
(2.) Satellites - What are they? What do we see up there?
(3.) Telescopes - Pros and Cons
*(1) STARS AREN’T FAR-AWAY SUNS:*
The new videos that we have of stars prove that they’re not far off “Suns”… this destroys the heliocentric model in one fell swoop.
*(2) SATELLITES* 🛰 📡
Question: If there are no satellites, then what is it that we see up there?
Answer: High altitude balloons, long-life unmanned reconnaissance airplanes, dirigibles, uav's, drones, experimental comms platforms... yes, we can see lots of stuff up there flying around, but that doesn't mean they're satellites.
By the way, the blimps, dirigibles and tethered balloons at high-altitude are what you’re aiming your so-called “satellite dish” at. The thing that you call a “satellite dish” was, in truth, originally called a “directional antenna”. They changed the common parlance, the common terminology.
*(3) TELESCOPES*
The Telescopes shown here are Newtonian... “Dobsonian light-collector” telescopes are even worse. There are a few types of telescopes, but they all have similar problems. They reassemble an image after the light has been mixed, crossed over itself and reflected several times, which is why they don't properly represent what's in the sky. Alternatively, CCD detectors in high quality digital cameras (like a nikonp900) just record the light that strikes them... there's no crossover or mixing, so they give a more accurate representation of what stars actually look like. When we look through a high-quality zoom CCD lens we can see that stars are not “far-off suns” but are nearby electric, plasmic (plasma) or piezoelectric "beings" ... to me they appear to be what scripture says they are... Angels.
Thank you!
Please remember to leave a comment!
God bless you,
Glen.
