Uploaded October 2019 | Updated September 2026, 2 days ago
In this video, I show you how to solve the Schrodinger equation for a particle confined to a 2-sphere space.
My Quantum Mechanics Lecture Series:
youtube.com/playlist?list=PLSpklniGdSfSsAFCzO-YWGlJ4TNv8sMdy
There is a typo in the spherical harmonics normalization constant. In the second fraction under the square root, the 1's are supposed to be l's.
Deriving The Orbital Angular Momentum Eigenfunctions:
youtube.com/watch?v=CgcCEhbNOMg&feature=youtu.be
Superfluid Helium Resonance Experiment video:
youtu.be/unUNQNmuvUQ
Quantum Field Theory Lecture Series:
youtube.com/playlist?list=PLSpklniGdSfSsk7BSZjONcfhRGKNa2uou
*I realize that a sphere is technically the surface of a ball, and so saying "the surface of a sphere" is not technically perfect.
*I also realize that the formula for the orbital-angular-momentum-squared operator given at the end should have a prefactor of "negative h-bar squared". That formula itself isn't used for anything in the calculation, so this error in no way effects the calculation.
In this video, I show you how to solve the Schrodinger equation for a particle confined to a 2-sphere space.
My Quantum Mechanics Lecture Series:
youtube.com/playlist?list=PLSpklniGdSfSsAFCzO-YWGlJ4TNv8sMdy
There is a typo in the spherical harmonics normalization constant. In the second fraction under the square root, the 1's are supposed to be l's.
Deriving The Orbital Angular Momentum Eigenfunctions:
youtube.com/watch?v=CgcCEhbNOMg&feature=youtu.be
Superfluid Helium Resonance Experiment video:
youtu.be/unUNQNmuvUQ
Quantum Field Theory Lecture Series:
youtube.com/playlist?list=PLSpklniGdSfSsk7BSZjONcfhRGKNa2uou
*I realize that a sphere is technically the surface of a ball, and so saying "the surface of a sphere" is not technically perfect.
*I also realize that the formula for the orbital-angular-momentum-squared operator given at the end should have a prefactor of "negative h-bar squared". That formula itself isn't used for anything in the calculation, so this error in no way effects the calculation.










