Slick, BTWN and Rappaport refute their own argument! @Laura_MCR
Slick, BTWN and Rappaport refute their own argument!  @Laura_MCR
Uploaded May 2016 | Updated September 2026, 2 hours ago
Despite claiming to have an god-given 'objective' morality..

...Slick, BTWN and Rappaport demonstrate to be able to access it, they have to use their 'subjective opinion' to find the right verses...

...meaning it it no longer objective at all.

They also demonstrate that because god cannot communicate with them 'directly'....

....their god is no longer omnipotent!

Re-uploaded because of an audio glitch

Sources:
BTWN Link:
youtube.com/watch?v=NDhIYQ9Zas8

Skylar Fiction link
youtube.com/watch?v=SlPa7XBTi2U
Slick, BTWN and Rappaport refute their own argument!ON THE CASE: RUSSIA INVASION OF UKRAINEPF56OXC: Lights out and on the phoneChristmas cheerWatch me NOT Suck at Elite Dangerous!A Debunking of Cheshires Malicious Compliance videoWho are the law breakers?Why I find Christianity untenable: The Resurrection ContradictionsKM10 OBY Pinch point passOn The Case: Scottish Independence ReferendumOn The Case: Oreo CookiesMOVIE CLUB:  Chasing Amy
LAURA |

Slick, BTWN and Rappaport refute their own argument!

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER