Uploaded October 2025 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
Birthright citizenship, guaranteed by the 14th Amendment’s jus soli principle, grants U.S. citizenship to anyone born on U.S. soil, regardless of parents’ legal status. Recently, it has come under scrutiny following an Executive Order seeking to limit citizenship for children of noncitizens, now being challenged in court. Legal scholars, civil rights advocates, and lawmakers are also questioning whether it should be altered, and if so, what it would mean to be born in the U.S. Supporters argue the 14th Amendment was meant to make citizenship a right, not a privilege, and that it prevents children from being punished for their parents’ status while encouraging long-term economic and civic contributions. Ending birthright citizenship would also create a permanent underclass of vulnerable stateless children born and raised in America but denied the rights of full citizens, such as healthcare and education. Critics say it fuels illegal immigration, encourages “birth tourism,” and grants citizenship to children of those with no legal ties to the U.S. They argue this creates perverse incentives and strains an already overburdened immigration system.
With this legal context, Open to Debate, in partnership with Arizona State University, debates the question: Should America End Birthright Citizenship?
This debate was recorded on October 9, 2025 at 1 PM at the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication at Arizona State University in Phoenix, AZ.
This event is part of a new partnership between Open to Debate and Arizona State University’s Institute of Politics to bring live debate programming to ASU’s campus in a special series titled PRO/CONversations. Produced by Arizona PBS in the Arizona State University Media Enterprise—which will air and promote the recorded programs—the series is designed to model civil discourse for students while offering hands-on production experience to ASU journalism students.
Arguing Yes:
Mark Krikorian, Executive Director of the Center for Immigration Studies
Horace Cooper, Senior Fellow at the National Center for Public Policy Research; Chairman of the Project 21 National Advisory Board
Arguing No:
Kris Mayes, Arizona Attorney General
Chris Newman, Legal Director of the National Day Laborer Organizing Network (NDLON)
Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates
Visit OpentoDebate.org to watch more insightful debates.
Subscribe to our newsletter to stay informed on our curated weekly debates, dynamic live events, and educational initiatives.
#birthright #citizenship #america
===================================
Subscribe on Substack: opentodebate.substack.com
Official site: opentodebate.org
Newsletter: opentodebate.org/insight
X: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg
Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/company/opentodebate
Instagram: instagram.com/opentodebateorg
TikTok: tiktok.com/@opentodebateorg
Open to Debate Apple Podcasts: tinyurl.com/bdzmz5xt
Open to Debate Spotify Podcasts: tinyurl.com/22tuxu7h
===================================
00:00:00 — Introduction: Should America End Birthright Citizenship?
00:02:10 — Opening Statement: Horace Cooper (Yes, End Birthright Citizenship)
00:06:42 — Opening Statement: Kris Mayes (No, Keep Birthright Citizenship)
00:11:50 — Opening Statement: Mark Krikorian (Yes, End Birthright Citizenship)
00:16:51 — Opening Statement: Chris Newman (No, Keep Birthright Citizenship)
00:21:58 — Moderator Summary
00:23:20 — Was Birthright Citizenship Intended Only for Freed Slaves?
00:28:08 — Would Ending Birthright Citizenship Create Stateless Children?
00:32:08 — What’s the Harm of Birthright Citizenship?
00:34:35 — Should Children Share the Legal Status of Their Parents?
00:37:02 — Birth Tourism or the Pursuit of Freedom?
00:40:44 — The Wong Kim Ark Case
00:42:01 — Would DACA Reform Justify Ending Birthright Citizenship?
00:42:45 — What Would America Look Like Without Birthright Citizenship?
00:47:08 — Is the 14th Amendment Still Relevant Today?
00:49:12 — Closing Statement: Horace Cooper
00:50:41 — Closing Statement: Kris Mayes
00:52:53 — Closing Statement: Mark Krikorian
00:54:33 — Closing Statement: Chris Newman
00:56:55 — Final Thoughts
Birthright citizenship, guaranteed by the 14th Amendment’s jus soli principle, grants U.S. citizenship to anyone born on U.S. soil, regardless of parents’ legal status. Recently, it has come under scrutiny following an Executive Order seeking to limit citizenship for children of noncitizens, now being challenged in court. Legal scholars, civil rights advocates, and lawmakers are also questioning whether it should be altered, and if so, what it would mean to be born in the U.S. Supporters argue the 14th Amendment was meant to make citizenship a right, not a privilege, and that it prevents children from being punished for their parents’ status while encouraging long-term economic and civic contributions. Ending birthright citizenship would also create a permanent underclass of vulnerable stateless children born and raised in America but denied the rights of full citizens, such as healthcare and education. Critics say it fuels illegal immigration, encourages “birth tourism,” and grants citizenship to children of those with no legal ties to the U.S. They argue this creates perverse incentives and strains an already overburdened immigration system.
With this legal context, Open to Debate, in partnership with Arizona State University, debates the question: Should America End Birthright Citizenship?
This debate was recorded on October 9, 2025 at 1 PM at the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication at Arizona State University in Phoenix, AZ.
This event is part of a new partnership between Open to Debate and Arizona State University’s Institute of Politics to bring live debate programming to ASU’s campus in a special series titled PRO/CONversations. Produced by Arizona PBS in the Arizona State University Media Enterprise—which will air and promote the recorded programs—the series is designed to model civil discourse for students while offering hands-on production experience to ASU journalism students.
Arguing Yes:
Mark Krikorian, Executive Director of the Center for Immigration Studies
Horace Cooper, Senior Fellow at the National Center for Public Policy Research; Chairman of the Project 21 National Advisory Board
Arguing No:
Kris Mayes, Arizona Attorney General
Chris Newman, Legal Director of the National Day Laborer Organizing Network (NDLON)
Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates
Visit OpentoDebate.org to watch more insightful debates.
Subscribe to our newsletter to stay informed on our curated weekly debates, dynamic live events, and educational initiatives.
#birthright #citizenship #america
===================================
Subscribe on Substack: opentodebate.substack.com
Official site: opentodebate.org
Newsletter: opentodebate.org/insight
X: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg
Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/company/opentodebate
Instagram: instagram.com/opentodebateorg
TikTok: tiktok.com/@opentodebateorg
Open to Debate Apple Podcasts: tinyurl.com/bdzmz5xt
Open to Debate Spotify Podcasts: tinyurl.com/22tuxu7h
===================================
00:00:00 — Introduction: Should America End Birthright Citizenship?
00:02:10 — Opening Statement: Horace Cooper (Yes, End Birthright Citizenship)
00:06:42 — Opening Statement: Kris Mayes (No, Keep Birthright Citizenship)
00:11:50 — Opening Statement: Mark Krikorian (Yes, End Birthright Citizenship)
00:16:51 — Opening Statement: Chris Newman (No, Keep Birthright Citizenship)
00:21:58 — Moderator Summary
00:23:20 — Was Birthright Citizenship Intended Only for Freed Slaves?
00:28:08 — Would Ending Birthright Citizenship Create Stateless Children?
00:32:08 — What’s the Harm of Birthright Citizenship?
00:34:35 — Should Children Share the Legal Status of Their Parents?
00:37:02 — Birth Tourism or the Pursuit of Freedom?
00:40:44 — The Wong Kim Ark Case
00:42:01 — Would DACA Reform Justify Ending Birthright Citizenship?
00:42:45 — What Would America Look Like Without Birthright Citizenship?
00:47:08 — Is the 14th Amendment Still Relevant Today?
00:49:12 — Closing Statement: Horace Cooper
00:50:41 — Closing Statement: Kris Mayes
00:52:53 — Closing Statement: Mark Krikorian
00:54:33 — Closing Statement: Chris Newman
00:56:55 — Final Thoughts

![Is Elon Musk the Perfect CEO Monarch?
Is Elon Musk the Perfect CEO Monarch?
Weyl argues no, pointing out that Musk’s own agency [DOGE] ended up “mired in personal distractions, amateurism, and administrative chaos.”
Yet, Yarvin believes that modern governments do a “poor job” despite access to advanced technology — and monarchy might still hold answers.
Full debate: https://youtu.be/irc6creOFGs Is Elon Musk the Perfect CEO Monarch?](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/A4M38CNdbho/mqdefault.jpg)








