Uploaded July 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
📖 Referenced in this video: Marvin Lubenow's Bones of Contention — the 1992 book that argued Homo erectus and Neanderthals were fully human, decades before mainstream science started catching up to that idea:
amazon.com/Bones-Contention-Creationist-Assessment-Fossils/dp/0801065232?tag=bsar07-20
William Lane Craig is one of the most respected Christian philosophers alive — and paleontologist Dr. Marcus Ross, the man Craig personally invited to argue against him, says Craig's own argument for who does and doesn't count as human left him disturbed.
In this clip, Dr. Ross — paleontologist and contributor to Perspectives on the Historical Adam and Eve: Four Views — breaks down why Craig's case against the humanity of Homo erectus rests almost entirely on brain size, and why that reasoning should concern us. Then he lays out the evidence Craig's own book leaves out: a coordinated Neanderthal elephant hunt, fish cooked on purpose roughly 780,000 years ago, and a boat trip he argues could only have been intentional.
This isn't about tearing Craig down. It's about showing that Scripture doesn't need to be protected from the evidence — it holds up.
📚 Books mentioned:
Bones of Contention — Marvin Lubenow: amazon.com/Bones-Contention-Creationist-Assessment-Fossils/dp/0801065232?tag=bsar07-20
Perspectives on the Historical Adam and Eve: Four Views: amazon.com/Perspectives-Historical-Adam-Eve-Views/dp/1087764904?tag=bsar07-20
In Quest of the Historical Adam — William Lane Craig: amazon.com/Quest-Historical-Adam-Scientific-Exploration/dp/0802884903?tag=bsar07-20
👤 Dr. Marcus Ross is a paleontologist and founder of Cornerstone Educational Supply.
💬 Watched to the end? Type "digging deep" in the comments.
🎥 Full interview: youtu.be/8SujS7z5pTo
#HistoricalAdam #YoungEarthCreationism #Apologetics
📖 Referenced in this video: Marvin Lubenow's Bones of Contention — the 1992 book that argued Homo erectus and Neanderthals were fully human, decades before mainstream science started catching up to that idea:
amazon.com/Bones-Contention-Creationist-Assessment-Fossils/dp/0801065232?tag=bsar07-20
William Lane Craig is one of the most respected Christian philosophers alive — and paleontologist Dr. Marcus Ross, the man Craig personally invited to argue against him, says Craig's own argument for who does and doesn't count as human left him disturbed.
In this clip, Dr. Ross — paleontologist and contributor to Perspectives on the Historical Adam and Eve: Four Views — breaks down why Craig's case against the humanity of Homo erectus rests almost entirely on brain size, and why that reasoning should concern us. Then he lays out the evidence Craig's own book leaves out: a coordinated Neanderthal elephant hunt, fish cooked on purpose roughly 780,000 years ago, and a boat trip he argues could only have been intentional.
This isn't about tearing Craig down. It's about showing that Scripture doesn't need to be protected from the evidence — it holds up.
📚 Books mentioned:
Bones of Contention — Marvin Lubenow: amazon.com/Bones-Contention-Creationist-Assessment-Fossils/dp/0801065232?tag=bsar07-20
Perspectives on the Historical Adam and Eve: Four Views: amazon.com/Perspectives-Historical-Adam-Eve-Views/dp/1087764904?tag=bsar07-20
In Quest of the Historical Adam — William Lane Craig: amazon.com/Quest-Historical-Adam-Scientific-Exploration/dp/0802884903?tag=bsar07-20
👤 Dr. Marcus Ross is a paleontologist and founder of Cornerstone Educational Supply.
💬 Watched to the end? Type "digging deep" in the comments.
🎥 Full interview: youtu.be/8SujS7z5pTo
#HistoricalAdam #YoungEarthCreationism #Apologetics
