Uploaded March 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 days ago
#potentiallycriminal #scotus #supremecourt #trump #trumpimmigration #trumpimmigrationpolicy #asylumchallenge
In 2016, the Homeland Security Department adopted a "metering" policy, where asylum seekers were stopped before crossing the border when ports of entry were deemed to be at capacity and turned away.
Al Otro Lado, an immigration rights challenged the metering policy in court, arguing it violated federal asylum law. This policy was canceled in 2021 by the Biden Administration, but issue was never resolved about if metering was legal.
The question before the Supreme Court is: Whether an alien who is stopped on the Mexican side of the U.S.–Mexico border “arrives in the United States" within the meaning of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq., which provides that an alien who “arrives in the United States” may apply for asylum and must be inspected by an immigration officer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONTACT
* Email - potentiallycriminal@gmail.com
* Actual Mail - PO Box 716, Willoughby, OH 44096
* Website - seanpmartinlaw.com
* Website - potentiallycriminal.com
MERCH
*TeeSpring - potentiallycriminal.creator-spring.com
DONATE
*Venmo: sean-martin-462
*Zelle: potentiallycriminal@gmail.com
*Paypal: seanpmartinlaw@gmail.com
Nothing in the commentary or responses provided by Sean P. Martin, Esq., Martin Media LLC, or Martin Law Office LLC, expressly or implied, shall be deemed to be legal advice and shall not be construed as the creation of an attorney-client relationship in any way. The viewer has responsibility of obtaining legal advise from an competent and licensed attorney, and is urged to do so. Support of this channel or purchase of any affiliated products or services does not constitute the creation of an attorney-client relationship. Any opinions expressed herein are my own and do not reflect those of any organization, association or group.
All references or clips that may be used on this channel are for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hughes v. Benjamin, 437 F. Supp. 3d 382 (S.D.N.Y. 2020); Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).
Copyright Martin Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Want to create live streams like this? Check out StreamYard: streamyard.com/pal/d/566028374507520
#potentiallycriminal #scotus #supremecourt #trump #trumpimmigration #trumpimmigrationpolicy #asylumchallenge
In 2016, the Homeland Security Department adopted a "metering" policy, where asylum seekers were stopped before crossing the border when ports of entry were deemed to be at capacity and turned away.
Al Otro Lado, an immigration rights challenged the metering policy in court, arguing it violated federal asylum law. This policy was canceled in 2021 by the Biden Administration, but issue was never resolved about if metering was legal.
The question before the Supreme Court is: Whether an alien who is stopped on the Mexican side of the U.S.–Mexico border “arrives in the United States" within the meaning of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq., which provides that an alien who “arrives in the United States” may apply for asylum and must be inspected by an immigration officer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONTACT
* Email - potentiallycriminal@gmail.com
* Actual Mail - PO Box 716, Willoughby, OH 44096
* Website - seanpmartinlaw.com
* Website - potentiallycriminal.com
MERCH
*TeeSpring - potentiallycriminal.creator-spring.com
DONATE
*Venmo: sean-martin-462
*Zelle: potentiallycriminal@gmail.com
*Paypal: seanpmartinlaw@gmail.com
Nothing in the commentary or responses provided by Sean P. Martin, Esq., Martin Media LLC, or Martin Law Office LLC, expressly or implied, shall be deemed to be legal advice and shall not be construed as the creation of an attorney-client relationship in any way. The viewer has responsibility of obtaining legal advise from an competent and licensed attorney, and is urged to do so. Support of this channel or purchase of any affiliated products or services does not constitute the creation of an attorney-client relationship. Any opinions expressed herein are my own and do not reflect those of any organization, association or group.
All references or clips that may be used on this channel are for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hughes v. Benjamin, 437 F. Supp. 3d 382 (S.D.N.Y. 2020); Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).
Copyright Martin Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Want to create live streams like this? Check out StreamYard: streamyard.com/pal/d/566028374507520
