ProPublica | SCOTUS Overturned Chevron Deference. The Effects Are Already Being Felt. @ProPublica | Uploaded September 2024 | Updated October 2024, 20 hours ago.
With the Supreme Court due to start its new term in two weeks, a decision from its previous session is already rippling through scores of cases, affecting all aspects of American lives.
In June 2024, SCOTUS overturned a 40-year-old doctrine known as Chevron Deference, which made it so that judges gave deference to the federal agencies that regulate industries, like the EPA and the FTC, when it came to interpreting laws when Congress hadn’t clearly defined the scope of the agencies’ power, as long as the agencies’ decisions were reasonable.
Justice Elena Kagan wrote in her dissent that “given Chevron’s pervasiveness,” the decision to do away with the doctrine “is likely to produce large-scale disruption.”
Months later, we’re already seeing that disruption.
To read our investigation, go to https://propub.li/47AWoMg
📰: Eli Sanders
🎨: Michael Haddid, special to ProPublica
🎥: Jose Sepulveda
-
ProPublica is an independent, nonprofit newsroom that produces investigative journalism with moral force.
+ Donate to support our work: https://propub.li/3WE9AMv
+ Sign up for our weekly newsletter: http://propub.li/2oyN8DY
+ Follow us on X/Twitter: twitter.com/propublica
+ Follow us on Instagram: instagram.com/propublica
+ Follow us on TikTok: tiktok.com/@propublica
+ Follow us on Facebook: facebook.com/propublica
+ Follow us on Threads: threads.net/@propublica
+ Follow us on Mastodon: https://newsie.social/@ProPublica
+ Follow us on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/propublica.bsky.social
+ Join our WhatsApp broadcast channel: https://propub.li/whatsapp
With the Supreme Court due to start its new term in two weeks, a decision from its previous session is already rippling through scores of cases, affecting all aspects of American lives.
In June 2024, SCOTUS overturned a 40-year-old doctrine known as Chevron Deference, which made it so that judges gave deference to the federal agencies that regulate industries, like the EPA and the FTC, when it came to interpreting laws when Congress hadn’t clearly defined the scope of the agencies’ power, as long as the agencies’ decisions were reasonable.
Justice Elena Kagan wrote in her dissent that “given Chevron’s pervasiveness,” the decision to do away with the doctrine “is likely to produce large-scale disruption.”
Months later, we’re already seeing that disruption.
To read our investigation, go to https://propub.li/47AWoMg
📰: Eli Sanders
🎨: Michael Haddid, special to ProPublica
🎥: Jose Sepulveda
-
ProPublica is an independent, nonprofit newsroom that produces investigative journalism with moral force.
+ Donate to support our work: https://propub.li/3WE9AMv
+ Sign up for our weekly newsletter: http://propub.li/2oyN8DY
+ Follow us on X/Twitter: twitter.com/propublica
+ Follow us on Instagram: instagram.com/propublica
+ Follow us on TikTok: tiktok.com/@propublica
+ Follow us on Facebook: facebook.com/propublica
+ Follow us on Threads: threads.net/@propublica
+ Follow us on Mastodon: https://newsie.social/@ProPublica
+ Follow us on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/propublica.bsky.social
+ Join our WhatsApp broadcast channel: https://propub.li/whatsapp
