Sacramento E.D.M. Inc. v. Hynes Aviation Industries Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained @QuimbeeDotCom
Sacramento E.D.M. Inc. v. Hynes Aviation Industries Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained  @QuimbeeDotCom
Uploaded August 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 42,700 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 988 casebooks ► quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview

Sacramento E.D.M. Inc. v. Hynes Aviation Industries | 2017 WL 1383289 (2017)

A struggling company thought it had found a lifeline when an experienced business consultant proposed an arrangement to increase its cash flow and stave off bankruptcy, but the terms of the contract were much worse than the company expected.

Were the terms so bad that the contract should be voided as unconscionable? That was the issue before the court in Sacramento EDM versus Heinz Aviation Industries.

Sacramento EDM, or SAC EDM for short, was a metal machining company.

Dan Folk, the company's president and founder, met Michael Hynes, the president and owner of Hynes Aviation Industries, or HAI. Facing financial distress, SAC EDM retained Hynes as a business consultant. Hines and Folk formed Oklahoma EDM, or OKEDM, a company that existed to loan money to SAC EDM. Through the joint venture, Hynes purchased SAC EDM's equipment and leased it back to the company. This deal generated cash flow for SAC EDM and provided tax benefit for both parties. However, SAC EDM continued to struggle.

The relationship between the parties soured, and SAC EDM sued Hynes and HAI.

Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here: quimbee.com/cases/sacramento-e-d-m-inc-v-hynes-aviation-industries

The Quimbee App features over 42,700 case briefs keyed to 988 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview

Have Questions about this Case? Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here: quimbee.com/cases/sacramento-e-d-m-inc-v-hynes-aviation-industries

Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here:

Subscribe to our YouTube Channel ► youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=QuimbeeDotCom

Quimbee Case Brief App ► quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview

Facebook ► facebook.com/quimbeedotcom

Twitter ► twitter.com/quimbeedotcom

#casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries
Sacramento E.D.M. Inc. v. Hynes Aviation Industries Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedIn re Clare House Bungalow Homes, LLC Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedGeorgia v. Ashcroft Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedClarke v. Clarke Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedInchaustegui v. 666 5th Avenue Limited Partnership Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedMishawaka Rubber & Woolen Manufacturing. Co. v. S.S. Kresge Co Case Brief | Law Case ExplainedCrosstex North Texas Pipeline L.P. v. Gardiner Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedFederal Aviation Administration v. Cooper Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedLowenfield v. Phelps Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedTripp v. Huff Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedCharles v. Barzey Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedFarmer v. Kentucky Utilities Co. Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
Quimbee |

Sacramento E.D.M. Inc. v. Hynes Aviation Industries Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER