Deconverted Man | Response to Arguments Against Atheism (MadeByJimbob) PART 3 @DeconvertedMan | Uploaded April 2024 | Updated October 2024, 3 days ago.
OV: youtube.com/watch?v=Yr1VACr0INE
I'm not using a single clip from the OV. He has a ton of logical errors in his video that can be easily found.
Including but not limited to:
Equivocation, strawman of empiricism, false equivalence, apples to oranges, circular reasoning, false dichotomy, appeal to consequence, begging the question, bald assertions, special pleading, & switching the burden of proof!
God is not defined at all by him by the way. Its so funny to see him demand we explain things without explaining god.
God is (X) and isn't (Z), but how does he know this?
He asserts that atheists want empirical evidence, well no I also would be okay with a repeatable test of some sort - but he doesn't have that.
God is an axiom - sure, prove it. Lets see a truth table Lets see some formulas for that.
He insists that "my method" negates "knowledge" without knowing what my method is! He just wants to be right I guess. Anyway... I'm done with him after this most likely, other bad and broken arguments to complain about.
I hate presup so, so much. *sigh*
Anyway I offer zero citations for all the things here so be skeptical about all the things if you want because being skeptical is a thing! :D
#apologist #apologetics #god #faith #logic #atheist #skeptic #lobstersexist #catapultpancakes
Thanks to @NerdyRodent for pointing me to udio.com I put in my lyrics and picked a style and it did the rest! :D "Strawman attack" will appear on my third album, I'm still going to make a music video at some point for a song that @HumanistArtists made for me, but I've not gotten around to it (sorry)
Please post stuff on this video even if its just to say hi to me so I know you are there :) thanks! ^_^
p1: Lobsters exist.
p2: If Lobsters exist, then Jimbob is wrong.
c: Jimbob is wrong.
(prove wrong)
OV: youtube.com/watch?v=Yr1VACr0INE
I'm not using a single clip from the OV. He has a ton of logical errors in his video that can be easily found.
Including but not limited to:
Equivocation, strawman of empiricism, false equivalence, apples to oranges, circular reasoning, false dichotomy, appeal to consequence, begging the question, bald assertions, special pleading, & switching the burden of proof!
God is not defined at all by him by the way. Its so funny to see him demand we explain things without explaining god.
God is (X) and isn't (Z), but how does he know this?
He asserts that atheists want empirical evidence, well no I also would be okay with a repeatable test of some sort - but he doesn't have that.
God is an axiom - sure, prove it. Lets see a truth table Lets see some formulas for that.
He insists that "my method" negates "knowledge" without knowing what my method is! He just wants to be right I guess. Anyway... I'm done with him after this most likely, other bad and broken arguments to complain about.
I hate presup so, so much. *sigh*
Anyway I offer zero citations for all the things here so be skeptical about all the things if you want because being skeptical is a thing! :D
#apologist #apologetics #god #faith #logic #atheist #skeptic #lobstersexist #catapultpancakes
Thanks to @NerdyRodent for pointing me to udio.com I put in my lyrics and picked a style and it did the rest! :D "Strawman attack" will appear on my third album, I'm still going to make a music video at some point for a song that @HumanistArtists made for me, but I've not gotten around to it (sorry)
Please post stuff on this video even if its just to say hi to me so I know you are there :) thanks! ^_^
p1: Lobsters exist.
p2: If Lobsters exist, then Jimbob is wrong.
c: Jimbob is wrong.
(prove wrong)
