Response: RC Apologist has intellectually dishonest position on bible inerrancy. @Laura_MCR
Response: RC Apologist has intellectually dishonest position on bible inerrancy. @Laura_MCR
Uploaded February 2019 | Updated September 2026, 2 hours ago
EDIT: RC Apologist changes his position to a provisional one during this video!

R. C. Apologist is upset that I say he is intellectually dishonest by taking a certainty position on biblical inerrancy ... but he hasn't even bothered to read the whole bible yet.
I explain why!
Response: RC Apologist has intellectually dishonest position on bible inerrancy.Rob Lane: Curious behaviourTransition updateI tried to help, but Jason Burns is irredeemable.On The Case: A Police officers Duty of Care (and twitter comments)Shamos loses his own challenge over a bible verse, but refuses to pay up!On The Case: Brexit: The politicians have failed! Time for a Peoples VoteThe Aristocrats Podcast Aftershow: MMR, Life Saving Journalism, an Interview with Brian DeerSkylar vs Matt Powell Post ShowSteve McRaes Echo ChamberAn Apology to Fiona RobertsonFilm Review: Rejecting Christianity : Teenage Conflict - 1960 Educational Film
LAURA |

Response: RC Apologist has intellectually dishonest position on bible inerrancy.

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER