Uploaded March 2016 | Updated September 2026, 2 hours ago
In a previous video, I presented Swinburne's argument which claims that natural evils are necessary for morally relevant free choices. This video is a short critique of that argument.
In this video, I discuss Richard Swinburne's interesting argument from a need for knowledge which claims that the need for knowledge of the consequences of our moral actions necessitates some natural evils.
Real Atheology Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/RealAtheolog...
Real Atheology Twitter:
twitter.com/Justinsweh
Real Atheology Patreon:
https://www.patreon.com/RealAtheology...
In a previous video, I presented Swinburne's argument which claims that natural evils are necessary for morally relevant free choices. This video is a short critique of that argument.
In this video, I discuss Richard Swinburne's interesting argument from a need for knowledge which claims that the need for knowledge of the consequences of our moral actions necessitates some natural evils.
Real Atheology Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/RealAtheolog...
Real Atheology Twitter:
twitter.com/Justinsweh
Real Atheology Patreon:
https://www.patreon.com/RealAtheology...










