Responding to Swinburne on Natural Evil @RealAtheology
Responding to Swinburne on Natural Evil  @RealAtheology
Uploaded March 2016 | Updated September 2026, 2 hours ago
In a previous video, I presented Swinburne's argument which claims that natural evils are necessary for morally relevant free choices. This video is a short critique of that argument.

In this video, I discuss Richard Swinburne's interesting argument from a need for knowledge which claims that the need for knowledge of the consequences of our moral actions necessitates some natural evils.

Real Atheology Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/RealAtheolog...

Real Atheology Twitter:
twitter.com/Justinsweh

Real Atheology Patreon:
https://www.patreon.com/RealAtheology...
Responding to Swinburne on Natural EvilThe Varieties of Hidden Experience (Part 1 of the Divine Hiddenness Series)Debate: Does God Exist? (Justin Schieber & Randal Rauser)Divine Hiddenness - An IntroductionDid I Misread Aquinas?Debate: Does the Christian God Exist? (Justin Schieber & Michael Horner)Divine Hiddenness with Gavin Ortlund (Part 6 of the Divine Hiddenness Series)RA024: Interview with Islamic Apologist Zack CristRA009: Interview: Wes Morriston on Moral Freedom and The Moral ArgumentCORRECTING @InspiringPhilosophy on Divine HiddennessMethodological Naturalism?Paul Russell on Hume and Evidential Theism
Real Atheology |

Responding to Swinburne on Natural Evil

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER