Research around feminist epistemology is being heavily criticised and open science should be aware @RIOTScienceClub
Research around feminist epistemology is being heavily criticised and open science should be aware  @RIOTScienceClub
Uploaded June 2022 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
To date, there has been promising progress in improving the robustness, reproducibility, and replicability of psychological research. However, for science to be truly open, it must be open to all. In this talk, the speaker will explore feminist perspectives on efforts to ‘open up’ science.

You can also find us on Twitter @riotscienceclub.

If you would like to give a talk or workshop for The RIOTS Club, please email riotscienceclub@kcl.ac.uk.
Research around feminist epistemology is being heavily criticised and open science should be awareProf Louise Connell | Conflicts and complexities on the path to open dataThe Cost of Correcting Bad Science | Roundtable DiscussionDr James Heathers | Tomf***ery, A Redux: Academic distortions beyond regular bad scienceDr. Niklas Johannes | Data visualisation in RChallenges and solutions to secondary data analysis by Dr Jessie BaldwinDr Tanita Casci | Research integrity from culture | The Cost of Correcting Bad ScienceTheresa Wege | The Racial Origins of the p-valueDr Eiko Fried | Theory building and testing in psychological researchKings Open Research Conference | ReproducibiliTea, Wellcome Trust, UCL Press, JISC & UKRIOWe should make it so that you need to know about reproducibility to succeed as a modern researcherTips on how to review your code | Prof Lisa Debruine
RIOT Science Club |

"Research around feminist epistemology is being heavily criticised and open science should be aware"

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER