Uploaded January 2009 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
This segment deals with the so-called "Scientific References" that NephilimFree claims exist in his "Critical Analysis" Ad-Hominem laden attack against the ExtantDodos and their ACTUAL Critical Analysis of John Pendleton's "Age Of The Earth".
The common factor between ALL of these slides is this: Not a single one of them makes any testable predictions, details any testing methodology, shows the work behind the assertions made by the Creationist, nor provides a genuine and verifiable scientific source for the claims made by the Creationist. Indeed many of them are JUST PICTURES, and many more are irrelevant to the point of discussion the Creationist makes in the original videos. Practically all of them are riddled with spelling and grammatical errors, and all of them make inaccurate presumptions based not on evidence, but on the foundational bias of the Creationist.
I will be dealing with each slide listed in the original "Educating The Dodo" response and pointing out why they are not even remotely scientific. This is my 2nd to last response to the "RE: Educating NephilimFree - Part 1" diatribe. After which I will complete the original series before moving on to something more productive.
Also please note, I will be providing annotations shortly after the upload and processing is complete. I will update this video description at that time.
This segment deals with the so-called "Scientific References" that NephilimFree claims exist in his "Critical Analysis" Ad-Hominem laden attack against the ExtantDodos and their ACTUAL Critical Analysis of John Pendleton's "Age Of The Earth".
The common factor between ALL of these slides is this: Not a single one of them makes any testable predictions, details any testing methodology, shows the work behind the assertions made by the Creationist, nor provides a genuine and verifiable scientific source for the claims made by the Creationist. Indeed many of them are JUST PICTURES, and many more are irrelevant to the point of discussion the Creationist makes in the original videos. Practically all of them are riddled with spelling and grammatical errors, and all of them make inaccurate presumptions based not on evidence, but on the foundational bias of the Creationist.
I will be dealing with each slide listed in the original "Educating The Dodo" response and pointing out why they are not even remotely scientific. This is my 2nd to last response to the "RE: Educating NephilimFree - Part 1" diatribe. After which I will complete the original series before moving on to something more productive.
Also please note, I will be providing annotations shortly after the upload and processing is complete. I will update this video description at that time.
