Uploaded June 2010 | Updated September 2026, 10 hours ago
visit radionics.org
Have chi energy sent to your inbox! chitransfertest.com
Watch our live broadcasts and learn how to use chi generators step by step tvopk.com
I am certain that this, my new approach to the method of radionics, will appear a bit controversial to many people, especially when considering the vast and good information available nowadays.
And yet, after having explained any type of action at a distance, which previously has been viewed as being "esoteric" or the like, as a function of life energy plain and simple; and after having developed mathematical formulas, which not only explain in easy terms that which appears "esoteric" or "alternative" to many of us, but which also help explain with ease many paradoxa with which modern physicists still are struggling, the ludicrous creationist approach of so-called "modern physics" appears to be a thing of the past, entirely obsolete. With this new approach I was capable of developing entirely new approaches to the age-old methods of action at a distance (AAD), which not only broaden our understanding of such action, but which also improve related technologies in quality as well as quantity, and there is no human technology of which I know, in which this new life-energy technology would not bring significant improvements, combined with a increase of our knowledge of ourselves, of our environments and of our universes. Naturally, it is obvious that such a new approach to an understanding of the environments in which we are living became a necessity.
Before I am going to get more into describing this new approach to radionics and explaining to you how you can use it, a few words about myself.
One of the challenges is that people who are incapable of coming up with other and more logical tools to do so, attack me by claiming that I am an "occultist" - just because I made an attempt to explain in simple scientific terms that which has been considered "alternative" for all too long a time -- things like this one have happened in the past over and over again, and those folks follow the footsteps of people of the past and their methods of countering innovation, any innovation, by burning people on the stake, who dare to challenge their dogmata, all the while most of them have strong beliefs in un-provable "gaseous mammals," i.e., anthropomorphically understood "spiritual" entities, above the clouds, below ground , and where not ... universal, everywhere present, omnipresent. Consequently, I am truly wondering for whom the term "occultist," i.e., a believer of that which is "hidden" is befitting more: Me and others who are making a serious attempt to explain in scientific terms that which has been practiced by humans for tens of thousands of years, and which appears to be a common characteristic of life as we know it, or does this term "occultist" fit more those believers in things that they simply assume without proof proper, things which remind me more of fairy tales than of science.
Since age of 13, I have not believed in such stuff whose existence cannot be proven and which seems totally worthless as far as improvement of provable interaction with the environment, I am talking about technological progress. In fact, here I am compelled to quote Korzybski, who in his book "science and sanity" mentioned that while the "mappings," or theories, which are the basis of technologies, have a history of continuous new knowledge and success, the "mappings" of philosophy (he called it the "hunting of the snark") and religious beliefs have a consistent history of continuous failure as far as real improvement and progress in dealing with our environment are concerned. At the same time, I took the time to examine many claims that sounded outlandish, "metaphysical" and the like, and I tried to find explanations, theories, or mappings, which allowed me to explain somewhat these phenomena, activities or methods, and with the help of which mappings new technologies can be developed.
visit radionics.org
Have chi energy sent to your inbox! chitransfertest.com
Watch our live broadcasts and learn how to use chi generators step by step tvopk.com
I am certain that this, my new approach to the method of radionics, will appear a bit controversial to many people, especially when considering the vast and good information available nowadays.
And yet, after having explained any type of action at a distance, which previously has been viewed as being "esoteric" or the like, as a function of life energy plain and simple; and after having developed mathematical formulas, which not only explain in easy terms that which appears "esoteric" or "alternative" to many of us, but which also help explain with ease many paradoxa with which modern physicists still are struggling, the ludicrous creationist approach of so-called "modern physics" appears to be a thing of the past, entirely obsolete. With this new approach I was capable of developing entirely new approaches to the age-old methods of action at a distance (AAD), which not only broaden our understanding of such action, but which also improve related technologies in quality as well as quantity, and there is no human technology of which I know, in which this new life-energy technology would not bring significant improvements, combined with a increase of our knowledge of ourselves, of our environments and of our universes. Naturally, it is obvious that such a new approach to an understanding of the environments in which we are living became a necessity.
Before I am going to get more into describing this new approach to radionics and explaining to you how you can use it, a few words about myself.
One of the challenges is that people who are incapable of coming up with other and more logical tools to do so, attack me by claiming that I am an "occultist" - just because I made an attempt to explain in simple scientific terms that which has been considered "alternative" for all too long a time -- things like this one have happened in the past over and over again, and those folks follow the footsteps of people of the past and their methods of countering innovation, any innovation, by burning people on the stake, who dare to challenge their dogmata, all the while most of them have strong beliefs in un-provable "gaseous mammals," i.e., anthropomorphically understood "spiritual" entities, above the clouds, below ground , and where not ... universal, everywhere present, omnipresent. Consequently, I am truly wondering for whom the term "occultist," i.e., a believer of that which is "hidden" is befitting more: Me and others who are making a serious attempt to explain in scientific terms that which has been practiced by humans for tens of thousands of years, and which appears to be a common characteristic of life as we know it, or does this term "occultist" fit more those believers in things that they simply assume without proof proper, things which remind me more of fairy tales than of science.
Since age of 13, I have not believed in such stuff whose existence cannot be proven and which seems totally worthless as far as improvement of provable interaction with the environment, I am talking about technological progress. In fact, here I am compelled to quote Korzybski, who in his book "science and sanity" mentioned that while the "mappings," or theories, which are the basis of technologies, have a history of continuous new knowledge and success, the "mappings" of philosophy (he called it the "hunting of the snark") and religious beliefs have a consistent history of continuous failure as far as real improvement and progress in dealing with our environment are concerned. At the same time, I took the time to examine many claims that sounded outlandish, "metaphysical" and the like, and I tried to find explanations, theories, or mappings, which allowed me to explain somewhat these phenomena, activities or methods, and with the help of which mappings new technologies can be developed.
