Uploaded January 2014 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
1935 was a big year for quantum weirdness. In the previous video we examined the Schrödinger's cat paradox. Here we look at the EPR (Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen) paradox. Does quantum mechanics require that "reality" at one place depend instantaneously on what occurs at another place? Is reality "non local?"
Part b: youtu.be/8UxYKN1q5sI
Comments, including questions, suggestions and constructive criticism are always welcome.
The Quantum Mechanics playlist: youtube.com/playlist?list=PL193BC0532FE7B02C
My development of Bell's inequality was largely motivated by the version presented in "The Meaning of Quantum Theory" by Jim Baggott, Oxford Univ. Press, 1992, ISBN 019855575
1935 was a big year for quantum weirdness. In the previous video we examined the Schrödinger's cat paradox. Here we look at the EPR (Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen) paradox. Does quantum mechanics require that "reality" at one place depend instantaneously on what occurs at another place? Is reality "non local?"
Part b: youtu.be/8UxYKN1q5sI
Comments, including questions, suggestions and constructive criticism are always welcome.
The Quantum Mechanics playlist: youtube.com/playlist?list=PL193BC0532FE7B02C
My development of Bell's inequality was largely motivated by the version presented in "The Meaning of Quantum Theory" by Jim Baggott, Oxford Univ. Press, 1992, ISBN 019855575
