Prep for the Revelation 16:5 Debate - Responses to Scion of Zion, Howe, Jones, Daniels, and McElroy @TurretinFan

Uploaded January 2025 | Updated September 2026, 2 days ago

In this episode, we consider comments by King James advocates and others as they may pertain to the upcoming Revelation 16:5 debate. As usual for this topic, this is also an open challenge to folks who think that the KJV has the correct wording for Revelation 16:5.

turretinfan.blogspot.com/2025/01/preparing-for-revelation-165-debate.html

Prep for the Revelation 16:5 Debate - Responses to Scion of Zion, Howe, Jones, Daniels, and McElroy

Considering Will Kinneys Arguments and Ephesians 1

Review of The Reformed Roots of the English New Testament, by Irena Backus

Theological Framework of Crushing the Great Serpent by William L. Hess | Part 2 | CIC 2025-41

Explaining the Source Critical (and Text Critical) Issue at 2 Maccabees 12:43-45

Penal Substitution: an Historical Theological Analysis - CIC 2025-39

Pseudo-Jerome Prologue, 1 John 5:7-8, the Johannine Comma and the Latin | CIC 2025-37

Transubstantiation Examined: Trent - Sessions 13 and 22

Debate Review of William Albrechts Rebuttal in Justification Debate | CIC 2025-27

KJV Readability Debate Review - Mark Ward

Debate Review - Atonement Debate - Dr. Joshua Farris Opening Argument

Double Debate Review | Ditmar Hoxha vs. Dan Chapa & TurretinFan vs. Georges Antonios