Pokemon B/W Wi-Fi Battle VS  rice4life16 ( 5th gen DW ability is illegal? ) @kimsparkle
Pokemon B/W Wi-Fi Battle VS  rice4life16 ( 5th gen DW ability is illegal? )  @kimsparkle
Uploaded March 2011 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Well, got a battle from X chat, thats his youtube name. This battle was sort of unfair to me, because majorities think that 5th gen DW ability is currently illegal because they are currently not obtainable, which explained why I'm not very happy with this battle.

Explaination:

So some of you might think without the toad pokemon with dw ability Water Absrob, I would still lose. So I'm trying to explain why that toad pokemon changed the winning side. First, the toad were send out to fight against my Milotic (WaterSnake), I poisoned the toad, and of cause trying to stall down it HP while recovering, when I thought my surf would do a decent chunk of damage ( as sandstorm doesn't boost ground type sp def, and stall him down, but with Water Absorb, this changes the match, forcing me to switch and received Stealth Rock damage afterwards, which made his mole pokemon do a sweep of my team.

Now you might say that even when the toad is down, I'll still lose, well that isn't the case, why? Because then I'll be able to sweep it with my Azumarill with aqua jet afterwards, Mamoswine and Garchomp are still handleable in my team, while the rest I'm preparing to play stalling or setting up with my ImAJelly.

Should 5th gen DW ability be ban? or should it be allow, post your comment here.
Pokemon B/W Wi-Fi Battle VS  rice4life16 ( 5th gen DW ability is illegal? )Pokemon Black and White(JPN) VS N(3rd time)Pokemon Wi-Fi Battle(HG/SS)Bibarel Special VS yyhhppss
fog jkinkk |

Pokemon B/W Wi-Fi Battle VS rice4life16 ( 5th gen DW ability is illegal? )

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER