Uploaded August 2026 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
Patrick Bet-David pushes back on Candace Owens’ claim that there is a 0% chance Tyler Robinson was responsible, arguing that such certainty requires stronger evidence. He points to the circumstances surrounding the arrest, the reactions of people close to Robinson, and reported statements tied to the case as reasons he remains skeptical of alternative theories. For PBD, the standard should be simple: follow the evidence and be willing to change your conclusion if credible new facts emerge.
Patrick Bet-David pushes back on Candace Owens’ claim that there is a 0% chance Tyler Robinson was responsible, arguing that such certainty requires stronger evidence. He points to the circumstances surrounding the arrest, the reactions of people close to Robinson, and reported statements tied to the case as reasons he remains skeptical of alternative theories. For PBD, the standard should be simple: follow the evidence and be willing to change your conclusion if credible new facts emerge.
