Michael Crouch | Paul, Dating the Letters of Paul. How bad is the consensus view? @Xoroaster | Uploaded September 2011 | Updated October 2024, 23 hours ago.
Just about everything one needs to know about dating "Paul's Letters". Yes, it's really that bad.
Paul is general "undisputed", because there is no need to "dispute" him. There is plenty of evidence inside and outside of paul that indicates the story is fictional. So, Pauline Dates have been allowed to stand, because there was no reason to worry about it. But the dates are wrong, They're likely off by a lot, and they should not be allowed to stand.
Marcion on Wiki:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcion_of_Sinope
This video may or may not contain images under copyright. Use of these images in this video are for the purpose of education or criticism, and fall under "Fair Use" US Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 107
Just about everything one needs to know about dating "Paul's Letters". Yes, it's really that bad.
Paul is general "undisputed", because there is no need to "dispute" him. There is plenty of evidence inside and outside of paul that indicates the story is fictional. So, Pauline Dates have been allowed to stand, because there was no reason to worry about it. But the dates are wrong, They're likely off by a lot, and they should not be allowed to stand.
Marcion on Wiki:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcion_of_Sinope
This video may or may not contain images under copyright. Use of these images in this video are for the purpose of education or criticism, and fall under "Fair Use" US Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 107
