Uploaded May 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Coal, oil, and natural gas remain the backbone of the U.S. energy supply. What executive and regulatory actions has the current Administration taken to reduce regulatory barriers for the development of these fuels? Will "lawfare" against traditional fuels - lawsuits aimed at hindering or even ending them - cost America the AI race? How will extraterritorial climate regulations by states like California and Michigan affect energy supply and prices? And what legal strategies are other states pursuing to rein in climate lawsuits and regulations? In short, will traditional fuels be saved by deregulation, or doomed by lawfare?
* * * * *
As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker.
Coal, oil, and natural gas remain the backbone of the U.S. energy supply. What executive and regulatory actions has the current Administration taken to reduce regulatory barriers for the development of these fuels? Will "lawfare" against traditional fuels - lawsuits aimed at hindering or even ending them - cost America the AI race? How will extraterritorial climate regulations by states like California and Michigan affect energy supply and prices? And what legal strategies are other states pursuing to rein in climate lawsuits and regulations? In short, will traditional fuels be saved by deregulation, or doomed by lawfare?
* * * * *
As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker.
![This or That - National Student Symposium Edition [Ep.3]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/YDgxCtQdS8M/mqdefault.jpg "This or That - National Student Symposium Edition [Ep.3]
This or that? Student Symposium edition! 🤔
Share your answers with us in the comments!")
![SCOTUS Short: Chatrie v. United States [Opinion]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/YVuR6sP-OXY/mqdefault.jpg "SCOTUS Short: Chatrie v. United States [Opinion]
How much privacy do you have in your location data?
In Chatrie v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the governments acquisition of Googles geofence location data is a search under the Fourth Amendment.
Watch this SCOTUS Short for a quick breakdown of the case and its implications for digital privacy.")
![[LIVE] The CLARITY Act and Fed Master Accounts: Defining Cryptos Place in the U.S. Financial System](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Yn7-W_CNjv8/mqdefault.jpg "[LIVE] The CLARITY Act and Fed Master Accounts: Defining Cryptos Place in the U.S. Financial System
Join us for a timely discussion on two developments shaping the future of digital assets in the United States. We will examine the CLARITY Act and its effort to establish clear rules for whether digital assets fall under SEC or CFTC oversight, as well as the ongoing dispute over Federal Reserve master accounts for crypto-focused banking institutions.
Together, these issues highlight a central question: will digital asset firms gain both regulatory clarity and meaningful access to the nation’s financial infrastructure? The webinar will explore how the interaction between market-structure legislation and banking access could influence stablecoins, institutional adoption, and the broader integration of crypto into traditional finance.
Opening Remarks:
• Hon. Cynthia Lummis, U.S. Senate, Wyoming
Featuring:
• Paige Paridon, Executive Vice President and Co-Head of Regulatory Affairs, Bank Policy Institute
• Alex Pollock, Senior Fellow, Mises Institute
• Corey Then, Deputy General Counsel of Regulatory Strategy and Global Policy, Circle
• Prof. David Zaring, Elizabeth F. Putzel Professor and Professor of Legal Studies & Business Ethics, The Wharton School, The University of Pennsylvania
• (Moderator) J.C. Boggs, Partner, King & Spalding
Register for the live webinar at https://fedsoc.org/events/the-clarity-act-and-fed-master-accounts-defining-crypto-s-place-in-the-u-s-financial-system
* * * * *
As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker.")
