Uploaded October 2019 | Updated September 2026, 3 hours ago
In this video, I show you how to derive the tree level pair annihilation cross section in quantum electrodynamics.
My Quantum Field Theory Lecture Series:
youtube.com/playlist?list=PLSpklniGdSfSsk7BSZjONcfhRGKNa2uou
Deriving the Feynman rules video:
youtube.com/watch?v=ToL-37wnHZw
General differential scattering cross section formula derivation:
youtube.com/watch?v=HqOetWTHeGs
Superfluid Helium Resonance Experiment video:
youtu.be/unUNQNmuvUQ
Note: There are a couple of typos in this videos between 11:05 and 11:19. In the first typo, instead of typing k_1dotk_2 = |k_1|(m+E-|p|cos(theta)), I accidentally typed k_1dotk_2 = |k_1|^2(m+E-|p|cos(theta)). The other typo consist of this error being propagated through to the next step. It is not propagated any farther, however, so most of the calculation is unaffected.
In this video, I show you how to derive the tree level pair annihilation cross section in quantum electrodynamics.
My Quantum Field Theory Lecture Series:
youtube.com/playlist?list=PLSpklniGdSfSsk7BSZjONcfhRGKNa2uou
Deriving the Feynman rules video:
youtube.com/watch?v=ToL-37wnHZw
General differential scattering cross section formula derivation:
youtube.com/watch?v=HqOetWTHeGs
Superfluid Helium Resonance Experiment video:
youtu.be/unUNQNmuvUQ
Note: There are a couple of typos in this videos between 11:05 and 11:19. In the first typo, instead of typing k_1dotk_2 = |k_1|(m+E-|p|cos(theta)), I accidentally typed k_1dotk_2 = |k_1|^2(m+E-|p|cos(theta)). The other typo consist of this error being propagated through to the next step. It is not propagated any farther, however, so most of the calculation is unaffected.










