Godless Engineer | Otangelo Thinks THIS Proves Jesus Was Crucified @godlessengineer | Uploaded May 2024 | Updated October 2024, 12 hours ago.
Today, we're diving into a fascinating debate about the historicity of Jesus' crucifixion, featuring Otangelo discussing the infamous Shroud of Turin.
In this intriguing exchange, I engage with Otangelo from Brazil, who passionately defends the Shroud of Turin as empirical evidence confirming the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus. Otangelo commends my skepticism toward religious claims and credits it for inspiring his own investigations into the historicity of Jesus.
Otangelo rejects the proven fact that the Shroud of Turin shows up in the 13th century. Carbon dating has shown it was created in the 13th century. He seems to think the only way to explain this is through a magical resurrection of a dead jew.
I challenge Otangelo's assertions by pointing out the lack of credible pre-13th-century evidence for the Shroud's existence, dismissing it as a medieval forgery amidst a surge of similar religious relics. Furthermore, I highlight the reproducibility of identical images and the absence of conclusive evidence tying the Shroud to Jesus.
Otangelo counters by citing attempts to reproduce the Shroud's unique characteristics, claiming they failed and supporting the argument that a medieval forger couldn't have possessed the knowledge or technology to create such a sophisticated artifact.
Despite our differing perspectives, this exchange sheds light on the complexities of historical inquiry and the challenges of reconciling faith with empirical evidence. Join the discussion and let me know your thoughts in the comments below. And if you enjoy content like this, don't forget to like, share, and subscribe for more thought-provoking discussions. Remember, skepticism is a powerful tool in the quest for truth.
Original Video:
Daily Bible Podcast: ge.hopp.to/DailyBiblePodcast
#atheism #christianity #atheist
Subscribe to this channel: ge.hopp.to/SubToGe
Join the Skeptic Mafia: ge.hopp.to/JoinSkepticMafia
Available Deals
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get 15% off Ridge Wallets: godlessengineering.com/ridgedeal
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Merch
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download CHRESTUS: ge.hopp.to/CHRESTUS
Get your "Citation Fucking Needed" Shirt: ge.hopp.to/citationfuckingneeded
"got evidence?" shirt: ge.hopp.to/GotEvidenceShirt
"btw, evolution is a fact" shirt: ge.hopp.to/BTWEvolutionIsAFact
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discord Server: ge.hopp.to/JoinGEDiscord
Today, we're diving into a fascinating debate about the historicity of Jesus' crucifixion, featuring Otangelo discussing the infamous Shroud of Turin.
In this intriguing exchange, I engage with Otangelo from Brazil, who passionately defends the Shroud of Turin as empirical evidence confirming the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus. Otangelo commends my skepticism toward religious claims and credits it for inspiring his own investigations into the historicity of Jesus.
Otangelo rejects the proven fact that the Shroud of Turin shows up in the 13th century. Carbon dating has shown it was created in the 13th century. He seems to think the only way to explain this is through a magical resurrection of a dead jew.
I challenge Otangelo's assertions by pointing out the lack of credible pre-13th-century evidence for the Shroud's existence, dismissing it as a medieval forgery amidst a surge of similar religious relics. Furthermore, I highlight the reproducibility of identical images and the absence of conclusive evidence tying the Shroud to Jesus.
Otangelo counters by citing attempts to reproduce the Shroud's unique characteristics, claiming they failed and supporting the argument that a medieval forger couldn't have possessed the knowledge or technology to create such a sophisticated artifact.
Despite our differing perspectives, this exchange sheds light on the complexities of historical inquiry and the challenges of reconciling faith with empirical evidence. Join the discussion and let me know your thoughts in the comments below. And if you enjoy content like this, don't forget to like, share, and subscribe for more thought-provoking discussions. Remember, skepticism is a powerful tool in the quest for truth.
Original Video:
Daily Bible Podcast: ge.hopp.to/DailyBiblePodcast
#atheism #christianity #atheist
Subscribe to this channel: ge.hopp.to/SubToGe
Join the Skeptic Mafia: ge.hopp.to/JoinSkepticMafia
Available Deals
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get 15% off Ridge Wallets: godlessengineering.com/ridgedeal
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Merch
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download CHRESTUS: ge.hopp.to/CHRESTUS
Get your "Citation Fucking Needed" Shirt: ge.hopp.to/citationfuckingneeded
"got evidence?" shirt: ge.hopp.to/GotEvidenceShirt
"btw, evolution is a fact" shirt: ge.hopp.to/BTWEvolutionIsAFact
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discord Server: ge.hopp.to/JoinGEDiscord
