Uploaded June 2017 | Updated September 2026, 1 hour ago
What differentiates our work from other legal exhibit firms? The foundation of our forensic animations are grounded in scientific methodologies and portray the greatest realism with the latest technology available. As an example of the quality of our exhibits, look no further than this nighttime visibility case. We built the animation on the left. The opposition presented the animation on the right.
Who do you think the jury believed?
"The High Impact animation was, unlike the opposing animation, based on scientific principles and methodology," said Attorney Michael S. Simpson, Esq. "The result was an animation that was far more realistic in appearance, and far more credible, than what the other side had done. So even though we had not initially intended to get an animation done, I believe that it played a critical role in our successful defense of the farmer."
Based on our analysis, the 3D tractor model in the second animation is not accurate, its reflectors are scaled incorrectly and misplaced, the lighting fall-off is fabricated - it's extremely easy to see that the second animation is not as credible as ours. The reason you should invest in scientifically founded accuracy is because when you don't, it costs you credibility and instills doubt in your representation of the event.
We invest in the most validated scientific approach possible. Our forensic animation is based on scientific measurements and nighttime evaluations of the actual equipment, incident location, and exemplar Jeep. The animation accurately recreates the perspective of the driver as he approached impact.
Read the entire case study, and learn what steps we took below to ensure our animation was scientifically accurate.
What differentiates our work from other legal exhibit firms? The foundation of our forensic animations are grounded in scientific methodologies and portray the greatest realism with the latest technology available. As an example of the quality of our exhibits, look no further than this nighttime visibility case. We built the animation on the left. The opposition presented the animation on the right.
Who do you think the jury believed?
"The High Impact animation was, unlike the opposing animation, based on scientific principles and methodology," said Attorney Michael S. Simpson, Esq. "The result was an animation that was far more realistic in appearance, and far more credible, than what the other side had done. So even though we had not initially intended to get an animation done, I believe that it played a critical role in our successful defense of the farmer."
Based on our analysis, the 3D tractor model in the second animation is not accurate, its reflectors are scaled incorrectly and misplaced, the lighting fall-off is fabricated - it's extremely easy to see that the second animation is not as credible as ours. The reason you should invest in scientifically founded accuracy is because when you don't, it costs you credibility and instills doubt in your representation of the event.
We invest in the most validated scientific approach possible. Our forensic animation is based on scientific measurements and nighttime evaluations of the actual equipment, incident location, and exemplar Jeep. The animation accurately recreates the perspective of the driver as he approached impact.
Read the entire case study, and learn what steps we took below to ensure our animation was scientifically accurate.
