Nighttime Visibility Accident Reconstruction Animation @HighImpactLegalExhibits

Nighttime Visibility Accident Reconstruction Animation @HighImpactLegalExhibits

Uploaded September 2019 | Updated September 2026, 52 minutes ago

highimpact.com This accident reconstruction animation was used to help Stuart Ratzan demonstrate how a construction company caused a catastrophic multi-vehicle collision after ignoring safety rules, public complaints, and a verbal warning from the Florida Department of Transportation.

The first vehicle hit the truck with enough momentum to carry it about a quarter-mile down the highway after shearing off its roof. Immediately after the first impact, a second vehicle smashed into the rear side of the tractor-trailer, and the driver was crushed by concrete barriers that fell off the truck. Finally, another semi truck smashed into the wreckage, proving that even a seasoned veteran truck driver could not avoid this dangerous situation.

The drivers of the first two vehicles were pronounced dead at the scene; the passenger of the first vehicle was taken to Memorial Regional Hospital with serious injuries.

Stuart Ratzan, Esq., and Stuart Weissman, Esq., tasked us with building this accident reconstruction animation to demonstrate what happened and how easily it could have been avoided.

Read the full case study:
highimpact.com/case-studies/Animated-Collision-Magnifies-Liability-After-Tractor-Trailer-Decapitates-Car

More Accident Reconstruction Animations:
highimpact.com/service/accident-reconstruction-animations

More Accident Reconstructions:
highimpact.com/service/accident-reconstruction

More Legal Animations:
highimpact.com/service/legal-animation

Nighttime Visibility Accident Reconstruction Animation

Dont Be An Exhibit - End Distracted Driving - 2

$4.3M Settlement: - 3D Mapping a Traumatic Brain Injury

$$35M Verdict Animating Former-UCLA Lineman’s Amputation A former lineman for UCLA lost his leg after a taxi cab collided with his motorcycle at a poorly designed intersection with a line-of-sight obstruction. Because the intense level of damage heavily outweighed the cab driver’s insurance policy limits, Garo Mardirossian, Esq., needed to show why California’s Department of Transportation, Caltran, shared liability for his client’s injury, surgery, and destructive impact to his career as a fitness instructor. Mr. Mardirossian argued that Caltran failed to address a dangerously flawed intersection design - despite receiving complaints about the line of sight problem in the vicinity of the intersection. The Defense argued that the intersection was not dangerous and that Caltran shouldn’t be held responsible because there had never been a “fatal accident” at the intersection in decades. Mr. Mardirossian countered those arguments with witnesses who testified that while no “fatal” accidents had occurred, Caltran had been notified of several wrecks at the intersection, and also received complaints - one made directly to the mayor - warning the government agency of the risks. The highest amount Caltran would offer was $2.9M, but Mr. Mardirossian believed his client deserved much more compensation for his painful suffering and the enormous obstacles he would now face in his career. He tasked our team with creating a Digital Injury Summary (DIS) that would anchor his argument with graphic visuals of his client’s injury, surgeries, and current condition. The DIS included: Injury Illustration to convey the graphic destruction of his client’s leg after the incident. Surgery Animation to show the many procedures needed to amputate the plaintiff’s lower leg and reduce his fractured femur. The following exhibits helped jurors see why the former Division 1 athlete deserved much more compensation for his damages, and they delivered it in the form of a $35M verdict - 30 percent from the taxi driver, and 70 percent from Caltran. This trial footage above from the Courtroom View Network shows how Mr. Mardirossian presented the surgery animations in his closing. You can also watch how the entire trial unfolded on the Courtroom View Network website, where its now featured in CVNs online video archive of high-stakes civil trials. You can see all the exhibits in the full case study, here: http://highimpact.com/case-studies/35m-verdict-illustrating-ex-ucla-linemans-amputation$

Asbestos Poisoning

Why Should I Use Visuals to Tell My Story?

Fetus Neural Immaturity - Birth Trauma Animation

Confidential Settlement: Animated Tanker Totals Truck

Umbilical Vein Rupture and Hematoma

$$37.8M Verdict Animating Product Liability After Tire Explodes Jonathan Halperin and Jay Halpern returned a $37.8M verdict to the driver of a concrete mixer who suffered catastrophic injuries after a defective tire exploded, causing his truck to smash into an embankment and flip over with enough force to knock the truck’s mixing bowl off the truck frame. The Plaintiff was paralyzed from the chest down with spinal fractures in his neck and thoracic region. He also suffered a ruptured spleen, a collapsed lung, and fractures to his collarbone, ribs, and forearm. Today, the 53-year-old veteran of Desert Storm and Desert Shield has extreme difficulty holding food in his hand and uses a special device to drink. An expert testified that his life expectancy had been shortened by 11½ years. The tire manufacturer argued that there were no inherent defects in its tires, and the victim was to blame for ignoring cuts in the tire, hitting a pothole, and failing to properly handle the vehicle after the tire blew. $4M was the highest amount the Defense was willing to offer. Mr. Halperin and Mr. Halpern needed to show jurors that the tire broke apart and exploded because of two manufacturing defects that turned the tire into “a ticking time bomb.” They also needed jurors to understand why these negligent acts clearly and directly contributed to the tire’s explosion. Our forensic team was tasked with building an animation that would achieve the following visual objectives: Introduce the tire’s anatomy to build context for the defective liner. Establish that the tire manufacturer made its inner liners too thin. Show how the tire’s inner liner also displayed evidence of imprints from its fabric backing during storage - a clear indicator that the tire had not completely bonded and should have been scrapped by the manufacturer. Demonstrate how neglecting these two points resulted in an inner liner that would allow oxygen to permeate into the tire, causing degradation to its physical properties until it suddenly and catastrophically failed. Reinforce these points with photographic evidence showing unmistakable evidence of oxidation and degradation. The following animation helped Plaintiff attorneys convince the jury to compensate their client with a $37.8M verdict. View the entire Case Study: https://highimpact.com/case-studies/37.8m-verdict-animating-product-defects-after-tire-explodes$

$11M Verdict: Animated Truth of Traumatic Brain Injury

Confidential Settlement: Animating How Misdiagnosed Infection Caused Septic Shock

Nighttime Visibility Accident Reconstruction Animation