Uploaded June 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
📖 Dr. Hebert's book → amzn.to/3S20BVK
The Ice Age and Climate Change: A Creationist Perspective
Young Earth creationists aren't just playing defense anymore — they're making testable scientific predictions and publishing peer-reviewed research. In this interview, Dr. Jake Hebert (PhD in Physics, UT Dallas) from the Institute for Creation Research joins us to break down the cutting-edge science behind the young Earth creation model.
We dig into the creationist Ice Age model, why the famous "Pacemaker of the Ice Ages" paper may need to be retracted, the surprising link between Milankovitch theory and climate alarmism, fossil evidence for pre-flood animal longevity, and ICR's Continuous Environmental Tracking (CET) model as a creation-based alternative to Darwinian natural selection.
If you made it to the end, type "Digging deep" in the comments to enter a giveaway for ICR's new documentary "On Thin Ice"!
Some of the graphics were provided by Dr. Hebert. Many were my own. Any errors in graphics are mine, not the responsibility of Dr. Hebert or ICR.
⏱ TIMESTAMPS
00:00 – Young Earth Creation Is Going on Offense
05:28 – Do Ice Cores Really Disprove a Young Earth?
18:40 – The Deepest Argument in the Entire Debate
35:44 – The Antarctic Prediction That Shouldn't Exist
39:30 – The New Theory Challenging Random Mutation
44:55 – Fossil Evidence for Extreme Longevity?
đź“š BOOKS
The Ice Age & Climate Change (Hebert) → amzn.to/3S20BVK
Scientific Creationism (Morris) → amzn.to/4uyuWbY
Clearly Seen: Arguments for Design (Guliuzza) → amzn.to/4ovtNka
Aware and Prepared (Guliuzza) → amzn.to/4v84iHR
đź“€ DVD
On Thin Ice (ICR Store) → store.icr.org/on-thin-ice.html
đź“„ ICR ARTICLES
Milankovitch Meltdown Pt. 1 → icr.org/article/milankovitch-meltdown-toppling-iconic
Milankovitch Meltdown Pt. 2 → icr.org/article/9696
Milankovitch Meltdown Pt. 3 → icr.org/article/9752
CET Model Overview → icr.org/cet
🔬 PEER-REVIEWED PAPERS (Answers Research Journal)
Should "Pacemaker of the Ice Ages" Be Retracted? Pt. 1 → answersresearchjournal.org/pacemaker-ice-ages-paper-retracted-1
Should "Pacemaker of the Ice Ages" Be Retracted? Pt. 2 → answersresearchjournal.org/pacemaker-ice-ages-paper-retracted-2
Should "Pacemaker of the Ice Ages" Be Retracted? Pt. 3 → answersresearchjournal.org/pacemaker-ice-ages-paper-retracted-3
Official Giveaway Rules: drive.google.com/file/d/1MWMzGunt_tetLCrjW7zk5y8B4DYkMx4D/view?usp=sharing
Special shout out to these members: @ricky3905 @steve6452 @marshallseaborn6214 @djpodesta @marshallseaborn6214 @ElaineBenavidez-q2b @carlrozitis4563
Thank you Clint Loveness ​for helping so much with this.
Correction: At 7:59 on the screen there is a typo that says 850,000 and should say 85,000.
📖 Dr. Hebert's book → amzn.to/3S20BVK
The Ice Age and Climate Change: A Creationist Perspective
Young Earth creationists aren't just playing defense anymore — they're making testable scientific predictions and publishing peer-reviewed research. In this interview, Dr. Jake Hebert (PhD in Physics, UT Dallas) from the Institute for Creation Research joins us to break down the cutting-edge science behind the young Earth creation model.
We dig into the creationist Ice Age model, why the famous "Pacemaker of the Ice Ages" paper may need to be retracted, the surprising link between Milankovitch theory and climate alarmism, fossil evidence for pre-flood animal longevity, and ICR's Continuous Environmental Tracking (CET) model as a creation-based alternative to Darwinian natural selection.
If you made it to the end, type "Digging deep" in the comments to enter a giveaway for ICR's new documentary "On Thin Ice"!
Some of the graphics were provided by Dr. Hebert. Many were my own. Any errors in graphics are mine, not the responsibility of Dr. Hebert or ICR.
⏱ TIMESTAMPS
00:00 – Young Earth Creation Is Going on Offense
05:28 – Do Ice Cores Really Disprove a Young Earth?
18:40 – The Deepest Argument in the Entire Debate
35:44 – The Antarctic Prediction That Shouldn't Exist
39:30 – The New Theory Challenging Random Mutation
44:55 – Fossil Evidence for Extreme Longevity?
đź“š BOOKS
The Ice Age & Climate Change (Hebert) → amzn.to/3S20BVK
Scientific Creationism (Morris) → amzn.to/4uyuWbY
Clearly Seen: Arguments for Design (Guliuzza) → amzn.to/4ovtNka
Aware and Prepared (Guliuzza) → amzn.to/4v84iHR
đź“€ DVD
On Thin Ice (ICR Store) → store.icr.org/on-thin-ice.html
đź“„ ICR ARTICLES
Milankovitch Meltdown Pt. 1 → icr.org/article/milankovitch-meltdown-toppling-iconic
Milankovitch Meltdown Pt. 2 → icr.org/article/9696
Milankovitch Meltdown Pt. 3 → icr.org/article/9752
CET Model Overview → icr.org/cet
🔬 PEER-REVIEWED PAPERS (Answers Research Journal)
Should "Pacemaker of the Ice Ages" Be Retracted? Pt. 1 → answersresearchjournal.org/pacemaker-ice-ages-paper-retracted-1
Should "Pacemaker of the Ice Ages" Be Retracted? Pt. 2 → answersresearchjournal.org/pacemaker-ice-ages-paper-retracted-2
Should "Pacemaker of the Ice Ages" Be Retracted? Pt. 3 → answersresearchjournal.org/pacemaker-ice-ages-paper-retracted-3
Official Giveaway Rules: drive.google.com/file/d/1MWMzGunt_tetLCrjW7zk5y8B4DYkMx4D/view?usp=sharing
Special shout out to these members: @ricky3905 @steve6452 @marshallseaborn6214 @djpodesta @marshallseaborn6214 @ElaineBenavidez-q2b @carlrozitis4563
Thank you Clint Loveness ​for helping so much with this.
Correction: At 7:59 on the screen there is a typo that says 850,000 and should say 85,000.
