Uploaded June 2025 | Updated September 2026, 6 days ago
Former atheist and neurosurgeon, Dr. Michael Egnor, converts from atheism to Christianity after being stunned by his research and practice of brain surgery. Many scientists and doctors believe that there is no such thing as the soul. Dr. Michael Egnor is a neurosurgeon presents the case that the brain alone does not explain the mind. Using modern neuroscience and his vast surgical experience, he believes there is a spiritual soul that transcends the brain, using fascinating case studies to prove his claim
[Original and full interview: youtube.com/watch?v=YiWW-q_kpOI ]
..........................................................
SUPPORT THE MISSION:
buymeacoffee.com/el23ft161l
Former atheist and neurosurgeon, Dr. Michael Egnor, converts from atheism to Christianity after being stunned by his research and practice of brain surgery. Many scientists and doctors believe that there is no such thing as the soul. Dr. Michael Egnor is a neurosurgeon presents the case that the brain alone does not explain the mind. Using modern neuroscience and his vast surgical experience, he believes there is a spiritual soul that transcends the brain, using fascinating case studies to prove his claim
[Original and full interview: youtube.com/watch?v=YiWW-q_kpOI ]
..........................................................
SUPPORT THE MISSION:
buymeacoffee.com/el23ft161l





![MATHEMATICIAN Converts To Christianity After Discovering THIS
In this video, Patrick Bet-David shares the story of his journey to God. Along the way, he unpacks the critical realization that Science, as wonderful as it is, is not the only vehicle to bring us to Truth and that many aspects of human life simply fall outside the view of Science. He then explains his process of seeking answers to those huge Why questions that go beyond mere process or mechanism. I hope you enjoy!
[ORIGINAL CROWDER CLIP: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c VGPL30sE +
ORIGINAL GEORGE JANKO SHOW CLIP: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4yvOxyD_8fs ]
..........................................................
SUPPORT THE MISSION:
https://buymeacoffee.com/el23ft161l MATHEMATICIAN Converts To Christianity After Discovering THIS](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/xx7cdBKYJxI/mqdefault.jpg)


![4 Eye-Opening Proofs That The Gospels Were Written Early!
Homicide Detective J. Warner Wallace provides extensive evidence that The Gospels were written early after the physical life and death of Jesus. This is great proof that Christianity is true. This also thoroughly debunks the claims that The Gospels were written hundreds of years after the physical life and death of Jesus, Our Lord! Yeshua is King!
OG source: https://coldcasechristianity.com/books-by-j-warner-wallace/
Script sourced via excerpts from Cold Case and my brain:
If the Gospels are late, they’re a lie.
I was inclined to reject the Gospels as late works of fiction... written well after all the true eyewitnesses were dead.
Before I could ever take the Gospels seriously as eyewitness account I needed to decide where they fell on the timeline between the life of Jesus (ending in 33 AD) and the Council of Laodicea which occurred between AD 350-363
The more I examined the evidence, the more I believed that the Gospels were written early enough in history to be taken seriously as eyewitnesses accounts.
1. The New Testament did not describe the destruction of the temple.
Beginning with the most significant Jewish historical event of the first century, the destruction of the Jerusalem temple in AD 70. The Roman army (Under the leadership of Titus) destroyed the temple in AD 70 just as Jesus predicted in the Gospels (Matthew 24:1-3) Yet, no Gospel account records the destruction of the temple.
2. The New Testament Fails to Describe the Siege of Jerusalem.
Before the temple was destroyed, the entire city of Jerusalem was under assault. After lengthy battles and skirmishes, the Roman soldiers set fire to the city’s walls and the temple was destroyed as a result. Yet, no aspect of this three-year siege is described in any New Testament document. … the gospel writers certainly could have pointed to the anguish that resulted from this siege as a powerful point of reference for the many passages of Scripture that extensively address the issue of suffering.
3. Luke Said nothing about the deaths of Paul & Peter... The apostle Paul was martyred in the City of Rome in AD 64, and Peter was martyred shortly afterword in AD 65. While Luke wrote extensively about Paul and Peter in the book of Acts and featured them prominently, he said nothing about their deaths.
Acts concludes with Paul being under House arrest in Rome.
And disagreeing among themselves, they departed after Paul had made one statement: “The Holy Spirit was right in saying to your fathers through Isaiah the prophet:
26 “‘Go to this people, and say,
“You will indeed hear but never understand,
and you will indeed see but never perceive.”
27 For this peoples heart has grown dull,
and with their ears they can barely hear,
and their eyes they have closed;
lest they should see with their eyes
and hear with their ears
and understand with their heart
and turn, and I would heal them.’
28 Therefore let it be known to you that this salvation of God has been sent to the Gentiles; they will listen.”[f]
30 He lived there two whole years at his own expense,[g] and welcomed all who came to him, 31 proclaiming the kingdom of God and teaching about the Lord Jesus Christ with all boldness and without hindrance.
4. Luke’s Gospel Predates the Book of Acts : Acts 1:1-2 the first account I composed, Theophilus, about all that Jesus began to do and teach until the day when he was taken up to heaven, after He had by the Holy Spirit given orders to the Apostles whom he had chosen (Acts 1:1-2)
Cold Case Christianity, written by Homicide Detective and ex-atheist J. Warner Wallace includes a dozen reasons to accept that the Gospels were written early after the death of Jesus. This was just a small sampling.
Anti-Christian conspiracy theorists may cite any number of reasons to not accept these, but the points on Luke’s account is important to understand. Luke is a very detail-oriented writer. Read just a few chapters of Luke or Acts and you can witness his detail-oriented writings for yourself. Yet, again, as J. Warner Wallace noted as other ex-atheists like Lee Strobel and Josh McDowell note – his detailed narratives don’t include any events happening after approx. 60 AD. Thus, how can an objective observer postulate that they were written much later? It’s nonsense. Speaking of Conspiracy theorists, the first episode of this series delves into a lot of other anti-Christian conspiracy theorists and debunks the notion that Jesus never existed. Christ is King and every knee will bow. The bible’s words, not mine
Im most active here. I also have an accounts on:
Http://www.x.com/MTPiano4Christ 4 Eye-Opening Proofs That The Gospels Were Written Early!](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ypzbG_JkxIQ/mqdefault.jpg)

